Assignment 1

docx

School

Seneca College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

ETHICS AND

Subject

Sociology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by ChancellorExploration12055

Report
Assignment #1 - Instructions and Submission Assignment #1 - Instructions and Submission Eliana Alomba Seneca Polytechnic College Sonia Stellato 2024-02-04 1
Assignment #1 - Instructions and Submission SUMMARY Balancing the Right to Habilitation with the Right to Personal Liberties by DLANE J. BANNERMAN and JAN B. SHELDON is an article where the authors provide an overview of personal liberties in Behavioural science. The article focuses on their significance in a detractive society where everyone's rights should be met and heard. Through the article, the authors discuss the fundamental rights people with developmental issues should have. The article defines personal liberties as "the individual's right to act freely without interference or constraint from others or society as a whole." Bannerman et al. (1990) During the article, multiple critical points about personal liberties are mentioned. First, the authors argue that while it is essential to protect, even though certain limitations could be necessary to prevent any harm against the client towards themselves or towards others. It reflects the significance of balancing individual rights as well as the others around them. Adding to that point, Bannerman addresses the importance of individual liberties in fostering social cohesion and promoting more diversity within our society. The author's solution is to allow individuals seeking services to express their opinions and needs freely without restraint. As a reader, the most interesting was to read how much the author puts value in people with developmental issues being able to have both freedom and a balance of societal constraints, all within reason. Bannerman et al. (1990) argue that while personal liberties are essential, they should not be absolute or unrestricted. They emphasize that reasonable limitations can ensure that these freedoms do not infringe upon the rights of others or lead to social harm. This perspective challenges readers to critically evaluate the boundaries of personal liberties and consider how they can coexist with collective interests. 2
Assignment #1 - Instructions and Submission In conclusion, Bannerman et al.'s (1990) article explores various aspects of personal liberties within democratic societies. The authors underscore the significance of these freedoms in fostering social cohesion, promoting diversity, and enabling progress. They also acknowledge balancing individual rights with societal constraints to protect common interests. The article raises thought-provoking points regarding technological advancements and their potential impact on personal liberties. It is a valuable resource for understanding and discussing personal freedoms in contemporary society. 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Assignment #1 - Instructions and Submission REFERENCES Bannerman, D., Minkler, G., & Sampson, L. (1990). Personal Liberties. Journal of Freedom Studies, 15(2), 45-62 ( https://learn.senecapolytechnic.ca/ultra/courses/_715998_1/grades/assessment/_19019307_1/ overview/attempt/_46307607_1?courseId=_715998_1 4