Presenting and Explaining Data

.docx

School

Franklin University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

715

Subject

Statistics

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by leespencer131

Report
Presenting and Explaining Data Figure 1. (Retting et al., 1999) An explanation of what the study data reveals: A group of researchers from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety developed a study to evaluate red light camera enforcement in Oxnard, CA. Researchers did a quasi-experiment at 14 intersections aimed at looking at the ongoing community problem of people running red lights and crashes. Nine camera sites, three non-camera sites, and two control sites were studied (Retting et al., 1999). Researchers studied this experiment by looking at the number of violations, how well drivers followed the rules, intersections with cameras vs. intersections without cameras, and public polls (Retting et al., 1999). People who knew about the red-light camera use were asked in public opinion polls six weeks before the enforcement program started, six weeks into the enforcement program, and six months into the enforcement program if they were for or against using cameras to help police catch people running red lights in Oxnard. The results are shown in Table 5 in Figure 1.
Red Light Camera Enforcement 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Factor Strongly favor Somewhat favor Oppose Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Don’t know Public Opinion Survey "People Who Knew About Camera Use" 6 weeks before (N=349) 6 weeks after (N=252) 6 months after (N=255) Among respondents who knew about red light camera use: ‘Do you favor or oppose the use of cameras to enforce against red light running in Oxnard, as a supplement to police
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help