8-2 journal

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

HSC 320 19

Subject

Statistics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by DukeCloverLapwing35

Report
1 8-2 Journal: Research Studies in the Media Priscilla S. Hall Southern New Hampshire University SCS 285 Research Literacy Dr. Matt Reid August 20, 2023
2 It is quite evident that research and studies may garner significant attention and fame without being rigorously verified. This phenomenon has become more common as a result of a variety of variables, including the way the media covers scientific research, the incentives for academics to seek attention, and the public's desire for sensationalized discoveries. Researchers frequently create fascinating research that corresponds to current trends or social interests. These findings are quickly picked up by media sources because they draw attention and create clicks, views, and conversations. This haste to cover findings may occur without sufficient verification of the methodology, sample size, or general dependability of the research. For example, despite the fact that it had not been published in an academic publication, the Drexel University study on "sexting" was widely covered by several media outlets ( Gebelhoff, 2021) . The attraction of capturing attention and boosting traffic might lead to a preference for sensational findings over rigorous scientific analysis. The problem with research becoming popular and famous before they have been verified is the potential dissemination of inaccurate or even false data. When research that has not been properly peer-reviewed or validated acquires attention, it can lead to public misconceptions, inaccurate policies, and resource misallocation (Blackstone, 2019). The media's inclination to simplify and sensationalize scientific results might misinterpret the research's original meaning, compounding the situation. Robert Gebelhoff (2021) points out it is not only the job of the researchers to ensure accuracy; the media and the general public must also critically assess and comprehend the findings. The situation is troublesome since it undermines the scientific process's credibility. If studies become famous before being verified, public trust in scientific research could be undermined. Furthermore, it can squander resources and take attention away
3 from more credible and well-established research, resulting in the spread of potentially incorrect facts. Furthermore, the rush to fame could distort the incentive structure within the scientific community. Researchers may prioritize providing visually appealing results over scientific rigor, which might increase the probability of false positives, data manipulation, or other unethical behaviors. The drive to acquire media attention for financing and professional development can lead to a "publish or perish" mindset in which research quality and dependability take a backseat to get published and acknowledged. To solve these difficulties, both scholars and the media must prioritize accuracy and dependability (Blackstone, 2019). Preregistration, or "results-free" peer review, might help limit the rush to fame and encourage more comprehensive, methodologically sound research ( Gebelhoff, 2021) . To demonstrate that the results were not just a fluke, someone else must conduct another research that evaluates the same question to see whether they can obtain the same results ( truTV, 2017) . Furthermore, media outlets should be more careful when publishing scientific findings, concentrating on context and stressing the relevance of peer- reviewed research.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 References Blakstone, A. (2019). Sociology Inquiry: Why Should We Care? In Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods . Essay, FlatWorld. https://scholar.flatworldknowledge.com/books/31994/preview Gebelhoff, R. (2021, October 28). Opinion | The media is ruining science . The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/08/17/the-media-is-ruining- science/ truTV. (2017). Adam Ruins Everything - Why Flawed Studies Get Famous | truTV . YouTube . Retrieved August 17, 2023, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Phxht9U2yZk .