‘the Labour Governments of 1964-1970 Were More Successful Than the Labour Governments of 1974-1979.’ How Far Do You Agree?

Labour disunity was a huge contributing factor as to why the conservatives were able to dominate from 1951 to 1964. However, there are also other factors that assisted conservative dominance. Whether that be conservative strengths, good timing, the end of austerity or their handle on public opinion, all factors contributed to the dominant years. However, how long the conservatives actually dominated is also a question. Did they dominate for the whole period, or just part of it? The years 1962-1964 question conservative dominance and how labour reunited.

Heath can be seen to be a successful leader due to the fact he won the 1970 election, much to Harold Wilson’s surprise. However, many would place the win not down to the

Firstly the House of Lords reform where the voting rights of most hereditary peers was abolished. This makes the UK less undemocratic rather then more democratic. This is due to the fact that the House of Lords as a whole is an unelected chamber and therefore undemocratic, however by removing the voting rights of some

What were the two greatest successes and two greatest failures of the Wilson government 1964-70?

This was the case for Labour in 1997 when they won a landslide majority of 418 seats in the House of Commons.

In 1997, Labour were very much in touch with the electorate and focused on salient issues, whereas the conservatives focused on issues such as trade unions and devolution which were not deemed as salient. This benefitted Labour as they gained a huge win at this election and rather than personality playing a huge part, it may have been their policies.

In the 1935 election, the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation party won thanks to their competent leader with powerful and persuasive speeches, a strong platform and the failure of the opposition to gain the voters’ certitude . The leader of the CCF was knowledgeable and had an exceptional understanding of the party platform which allowed for proper and methodical responses and rebuttals. The leader, backed by a reliable support team was able to present key questions to the opposing parties which degraded the reputation of those parties in the view of the voters. The CCF party appealed to all voters instead of focusing on getting one specific voter group to vote for them. The other parties failed to win the election because they had a lack

Whether or not there truly was a ‘post war consensus’ in British politics from 1951 to 1964 is a highly debatable topic of which historians can often appear to be in two minds about; on one hand, Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson infamously described the period as ‘Thirteen years wasted’, whereas historian Robert Blake (a supporter of the Conservatives’, regards it as a ‘Golden age of growth’. The likes of Kevin Jeffrey’s even argue that consensus had even started before the war. Overall, the central issue was the idea of a mixed economy.

‘Domestic policy under Wolsey was a failure’. How far do you agree with this assessment?

Source 4 is a book called Mastering Modern British History from Norman Lowe which is published in 1984. This source is a secondary source. The Source sets up the thesis “Conservative Party hindered the country’s economic development. It criticises that the Conservative Party emphasised the improvement in world trade rather than improving the economic policies. This caused an economic failure. It accuses the Conservative Party for hindering the country’s economic development. The introduction of the stop and go approach caused this as well. The stop and go approach caused Stagflation. This is a situation where an inflation rate is high, the economic growth rate slows down, and unemployment remains steadily high. Considering the faults under the Conservative Party the government did not perceive their opportunities to improve the economic failures. The government had no coherent economic policy (they used stop and go). There was no structured financial strategy (the budget was used to buy votes). The investment in the Research and Development was

In October 1974 is was held another elections and the SNP representation in the Parliament raised to 11 seats. The Labour Government became weaker and started to prepare the legal situation for the incoming Referendum. The Government failed in amend a bill for Scotland and Wales Devolution, but it was introduced a separate amendment which made necessary the 40% of the eligible Scottish electorate to vote “yes” for the effective devolution of powers, that was known as the Cunningham Amendment. The 1st of March of 1979 it was held a referendum and “Yes” won but with not enough representation to reach the 40% needed to start the Scottish devolution.

Rabin was involved in domestic politics and became apart of his country’s labor party, helping with his chances of re-election in 1973 after the Yom Kippur War.

nationalisation and emphasised the solution of financial issues which conservative party could not handle and called it “New Labour ”party .In 1997 .The “new labour ”party won its greatest election .Exactly , when the election finished ,Tony Blair got the highest support rate in Britain history .In same line ,in premiership of Tony Blair. He hold his party together and achieved a far greater achievement of unity than former Labour leader .In this following page , it will assess the positive and negative influence of the Tony Blair’s on his Labour

Source 1 is Margaret Thatcher 's opinion upon her tenure as Prime Minister, making it a subjective source due to it being written by the woman who was in control during these economic policies being introduced and agreed with them on an ideological level. It is likely to over-emphasise their role in any positive outcomes for the country, and to the positives of the period overall, as well as to ignore negative outcomes. The Downing Street Years was published in 1993 and written a few months prior to this, which was during John Major 's Conservative government after Thatcher 's fall on 28th November 1990. This time period only allow Thatcher to consider the short and medium term effects, but it has not yet been a long enough period to the

The Success of the First Two Labour Governments was Outweighed by the Failures in Britain The success of Labour's governments during its two terms in power, in the 1920's easily outweighed its failures and shortcomings, in Britain. This was a Labour government that introduced the idea of free mass secondary education, built over half a million houses, and through Labour established Britain as a major player in European and World politics. The Labour government were in power at the time of the Great Depression, and their failure to address the serious economic crisis bought about as a result of an economic downturn, following the short boom after the war, may be seen as a severe weakness in the