“Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses of Reason as a Way of Knowing?”

use of reason. This is a very, very difficult subject to discuss, as one is

Choices are the decisions we make in life, some are good others are bad. Choosing a bad decision can affect families mentally, financially and emotionally. Bad choices always have consequences. A persons emotions can alter them into making terrible choices. Sometimes there is not a choice that is positive.

Reason and emotion how does it affect our critical thinking? When you are dealing with conflict or debate, it is important to use reason and emotion. If you feel strongly about a subject or conflict you will work harder to prove or disprove the subject. The problem is if you only use emotion your thoughts can get cloudy, emotions can take over. If

Reason also known as (logic or logos) refers to any attempt to appeal an argument using only valid facts. Some individual’s actions are based on reasons, as they are managed by rationality and they think very cautiously about all the decision they make. Conversely, passion also known as (emotion or pathos) refers to being able to persuade a situation

almost polar opposite of reason is showed in the numerous philosophers he references in the

Although causal reasoning is used a great deal in public speeches, it is seldom used in other situations.

use of reason. This is a very, very difficult subject to discuss, as one is

Knowing the reasons for events helps develop a deeper understanding of an event or a series events than just learning who attacks who and what comes about it. It also allows us to learn from our past mistakes, to prevent unnecessarily conflict, and to learn what not to do to solve a given problem.

For the most part, from understanding the book, the audience can tell that “reasons” are at this moment an endearing way of saying excuses and excuses are precisely complaints and weaknesses of as an individual who

In a universe full of chaos and injustice, society imposes an unspoken order in attempt to control the unknown. Everything must have an explanation, whether justified through social, scientific, or religious means. This notion creates expectations for how people should emotionally respond to events around them. However, when one does not conform to these expectations, a complex conflict arises between that individual and the surrounding society.

2. Reasoning with Emotions: This involves using emotions to promote thinking and cognitive activity. Emotions help prioritize what we pay attention and react to; we respond emotionally to things that grab our attention.

Immanuel Kant and David Hume diverge in their ideas about the nature of morality and do not see eye to eye on how to determine whether or not an action is morally permissible. Kant holds that practical reason alone can be used to determine whether or not a line of behavior is moral, whereas Hume believes that reason is inconsequential to morality and that the way to determine whether an action is moral is to examine the sentiments that it provokes within us.

It is important to have reasons because if we did not, we could not explain to others why we did what we did. It only seems logical for us to have reasons. Roth reminded me of something my dad once told me. Roth said that, “often, if someone goes to great lengths to tell you that he is not a liar, a crook, a troublemaker, or green with envy, he probably is one of those things” (Roth 46). My dad said it always makes him question when somebody says that they are telling him the truth, it makes him wonder if it is actually the truth or when they tell him something and it isn’t actually the

The final doubt questions whether our sufferers can even partake in a rational, non-emotional, reasoning process. The question then is going to revolve around if our sufferers can actually do a proper cost benefit analysis. Four aspects make up a cost benefit analysis. They are calculating benefits, costs, the probability of success, and comparing analyses to one another. Our sufferers should be able to compare, but the other three are in doubt. When attributing costs and benefit, there is both a logical part, and emotional part. It seems like they can do the logical part, but as we just showed, our sufferers don’t have the capacity to reason emotionally. What this means is that they are not going to be able to apply proper values to emotional

Divine reasoning is beyond the scope of man, as it cannot be reached through our own way of thinking, researching or exploring. It calls for the guiding hand of divinity and thus, it is not always clear or