1: 1 Is Not The Answer Response

Undoubtedly, technology has done wonders throughout and left an ineradicable mark on education, but technology has its

It is a new world today because of the rate it is growing at. From homes all over America to international companies, technology has now managed to creep its way into the classrooms. In the article “Virtual Students, Digital Classroom” Neil Postman states, “…We will become the kind of people the technology requires us to be, and whether we like it or not,we will remake our institutions to accommodate technology” (378). This statement affirms that the need for technology will just continue to grow and that it will govern children. Walking to the library and spending what seems like endless hours to do research for homework is unheard of anymore. Students nowadays have everything they need right at their fingertips, never having to leave the comforts of their home to do school work. With that being said, though, Postman also says, “...The computer and its associated technologies are awesome additions to a culture, and are quite capable of altering the psychic, not to mention the sleeping, [sic] habits of our young” (378). Is it actually helping students or is it honestly hurting them? With the addition of new machines, students are pushed to adhere more information but are given easier ways to gather

Yes, because with technology people are provided with effective ways of learning, it prepares students for college, and the real world. First of all, technology provides students with effective ways of learning during school. A variety of people learn better by just sitting in class listening to a lecture or simply watching a PowerPoint.

The biggest problem with today’s education is how rapid technology is advancing. So rapid, in fact, that schools are attempting to keep up, but are sadly falling short. Teachers are being required to incorporate new technology into their everyday methods of teaching. The use of IPads or laptops in classrooms can be helpful to both teachers and students(edreform online classes)”. If a teacher is not overly familiar with the new devices, then the students will lose what little time they have to learn. As a teacher is attempting to fix technical problems in one class, the class that has a tech savvy teacher will be advancing far ahead. On the other hand, if a classroom is full of students who are very unfamiliar with the technology will have to be taught how to operate it, which wastes valuable time. In today’s society technology usage is so much more widespread than it was just five years ago. The new toys can allow schools to broaden their curriculum. Since most work can be done on a single device, kids can work at their own pace and potentially reach heights they could never reach with book, pen, and paper. The benefits of this new tech greatly outweigh the downsides. The biggest problem with technology in classrooms is their lack of use. So few schools have jumped on board with these programs, and therefore are holding their kids back. These products are readily available, but “the use of new technology

Technology has digitized the traditional setting of a classroom with its enticement of quick access and efficiency. As alluring as it is to Reuben Loewy that we follow along with the times, others believe otherwise, because they believe it puts the students at risk of not only their

Is technology hurting or helping in middle school classrooms? Over the past few years there has been a huge debate on technology helping vs. hurting in the classroom. I decided to experience for myself how it is used  and if it is making learning easier.

Technology has digitized the traditional setting of a classroom with its enticement of quick access and efficiency. As alluring as it is to Reuben Loewy that we follow along with the times, others believe otherwise, because they believe it puts the students at risk of not only their safety,

Even though some parents and teachers might disagree with Pinker’s argument, they all give credibility to the figures from which the evidence came from. In the beginning, economists Jacob Vigdor and Helen Ladd from Duke University, conducted an experiment to show the effects of a student’s academics when they were offered their own computers. Unfortunately, the results they received back were not up to par with the students’ previous scores. Further in, Larry Cuban, an emeritus education professor at Stanford, states that he agrees with Pinker’s view on the matter, describing technology as a novelty to a child’s education. He says, “It’s true that there is often an initial uptick in students’ engagement with their studies-interactive apps can be fun. But the novelty wears off after a few a few months.” Lastly, Randy Yerrick, a professor of education at the University of Buffalo, addresses his opinion on the matter. He says that technology in classrooms is, “worth the investment only when it’s perfectly suited to the task, in science simulations, for example, or to teach students with learning disabilities.” Given these points, it is clear that Pinker’s audience can give credibility to the speakers found in her editorial. Thanks to the interviewees’ highly educated backgrounds, parents and teachers can trust and believe in what they are saying on

In the article, “One-to-One Computing Has Failed Our expectations” the authors, Norris and Soloway, address the developing One-to-One program as failing. They used this as a warning to different school corporations that have not adopted this new way of learning to wait for all of the issues to be worked out. Parents become an audience member when the authors talk about the students asking "Do I need to bring my laptop to class today?" (Norris). Legal guardians and staff would question why new electronic devices were such important purchase if they would seldom be used. The concluding paragraph speaks to the classroom instructors and school corporations when the authors say, “we need to redefine the curriculum in terms of what gets taught, and we need to redefine how it gets taught”(Norris). With the use of the word “we” the writers try to unite the audience and say that the whole education system needs to work together to change to successfully integrate more technology into the education system. In Nigel Green's article, “Pros and Cons of Individualized Instruction”, he addresses teachers as his audience. Green disputes common inquiries teachers have proposed in a “Con” paragraph. Reassuring teachers, Green says that they will not be replaced, only modified in a way they help children learn different lessons. Parents of a wide range of academically skilled students were targeted when the author talks about students not being left behind nor being held back from their potential capabilities. Green makes a point about students self-confidence level being higher with this new program. This persuades parents who want the best future for their child to support this article. “Five Positive Effects of Technology on Education" by William McCoy discusses the need for technology in the classroom and he persuades his audience, parents of students, how much

Does technology in the classroom have a brutal effect on students and teachers? We have all grown up using technology for school; whether using PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, staying up-to-date with assignments using twitter, sending a photograph of your answers to a friend, or to sending a text message to your parents telling them to bring you your assignment that you, unfortunately, left at home. At one point or another I am positive most of you have done one if not all. Even if you use the technology for all the right reasons such as researching, writing papers, or finishing assignments; it may not actually be helping you learn. How do your teachers get you involved in learning? Most teachers use technology to watch a movie, see and discuss

I agree with you, Laruen, on the fact that technology can better are education but it can also bring us down. Distractions and making it to easy to cheat are just some of technology’s downfalls.

Have you ever taken a tour to an middle or high school and saw where the black boards use to be there are now giant computer screens? Our world is changing to a new era where technology has taken over not only the homes but the schools as well. Computers can now be found in almost every classroom and home, but, is this a good a thing or a bad thing? In the New York Times article “Can Students Have too Much Tech” written by Susan Pinker she examines what it means to have technology not only in the classroom but, in the homes of many children. While I agree that teachers must also be equipped with skills to manage, educate, and control technology in their lesson plan, I find her reference to be flawed. Her references does not examine the educational

Technology affects every aspect of our lives. From romance to business, it has shown its presence everywhere. But technology has had a huge impact on education that cannot be denied, and has done nothing but improve the quality and quantity of education.

The use of technology has the ability to allow teachers to teach the student, instead of teaching the grade level. Jon Bower, CEO of Lexia Learning Systems, points this fact out when he states,

The use of technology has the ability to allow teachers to teach the student, instead of teaching the grade level. Jon Bower, CEO of Lexia Learning Systems, points this fact out when he states,