10 Million Pound Improvement Essay

The homeless shelters could be improved with proper funding and allow more room for people. Many homeless people dislike the shelters because of the lack of quality or overcrowding, so this solution would be perfect. However, it’s not exactly perfect because the funding would have to come from somewhere, and that would most likely be the rich people’s taxes. Another solution could be programs that find the homeless somewhere to stay and a suitable job that would help them get back on their feet. But once again, funding is a major issue. This is why slavery would be ideal; it’s a win-win situation for

The video shown in class “Lagos/Koolhas” really brings to light a major problem that is affecting the majority of the population. With the cities rapid development a majority of the population is forced to live in some of the worst slums that been highlighted in our course. These people are doing anything to survive, mostly working in the informal sector, selling whatever they can. Much like many other growing cities in developing countries a majority of Lagos has been developed with very little planning, which leads to the development of the slums that a majority of individuals are living in. These slums are built with whatever material is available at the time, and not suitable for humans to live in. They are crowded, dirty and unlike

This helps to reduce crime in the renovated area. There is a reduction in the growth of violence like armed robbery, gun violence, and gang operations in this area because of safety measures like police patrol and security implemented in these communities. Since resident spends a huge amount of money and resources into new housing, the management is forced to provide enough security for its tenants in order for them to feel safe neighborhood that I move to. Due to the huge sum of money I paid for the house in that neighborhood, I felt secure living in such a neighborhood because the police constantly patrolled around the neighborhood ensuring that everyone was protected and felt safe at all times.

Gentrification threatens millions of families around the world and is separating people from their ethnic background. A relatable topic to this controversy is the the removal of chinatowns across the country. Three out of fifthteen are still progressing while others are either being torn down or replaced with much more expensive high priced apartments or restaurants which the people who live there cannot afford. As you have the poor leave their was once was home, they flee to cities with cheaper houses or apartments for rent. Some of theses people even become homeless and always wonder where their next meal will come from. The most important issue here are the kids who live in these communities. Where will they get their education since they won’t be able to go to school? This will lead to violence and the percentage of homeless people will increase.

Gentrification is a problem in small and impoverished communities. It's a way for them to push all of the poor people out of their homes and let more of the rich people in. This is a problem is stems from money and it needs to be stopped.

In the first part of the article Major Brown discuss development in the world were people constantly are moving into cities. Major Brown explains that the growth of cities and megacities in general will happen in their slums, and that future conflicts will take place were

Gentrification is a problem that every country and city has experience rather they know it or not. Countries are affected by this process and many of its civilians are left with nowhere to call their home. Communities where they once lived turn into places they’ve never seen before. To be forced out of their own communities is only hurting the economic system of that city and/or country. The people that are being displaced are minorities and being forced out their community is killing their cultural.

Mike Davis, author of Planet of Slums, predicts the direction in which the world’s cities are headed, and how the changes in living conditions are only going to deteriorate if certain trends continue. The title of his book explains Davis’s vision for the future of cities as he feels there is enough evidence pointing towards an exponential rise in slum populations across the world’s largest cities. Additionally, he expresses his opinion on many issues regarding the rapid rise in developing cities’ slum populations, although he offers very one-sided arguments geared towards those who feel the current system is causing more problems rather than improving current conditions. This causes Davis to overlook the problems of slums as resolvable through different modes of assistance such as international aid programs. Instead, he views aid programs as the root cause of imbalance created during industrialization. Throughout the book, Davis presents information that confirms his preconceptions towards the slums. Therefore, all the evidence that is presented by him portrays confirmation bias as Davis fails to mention anything about the resolution of the problem of the growing number of slums and instead sees this problem as unavoidable. Particularly, Davis’ writing, although intended for the general population, is more geared towards critics who have similar ideas. Instead of providing the means through which the economy could be improved and the problem of slums could be resolved, it is

“We should give recipients of Section Eight intensive counseling on where to look for housing far beyond the limits of their neighborhood” (Kozal 224). I think that the idea of moving families outside of their current neighborhoods and into different communities not only encourages cultural diversity within the community but also within different school districts as well. This would slowly dissolve the current segregation problems within the schools without an overwhelming overnight change that would shock and possibly anger current families that would be scared of desegregation within the school system. “He was speaking of strategies to break the back of segregated housing patterns in the suburbs, one of the most impenetrable obstacles to school desegregation” (Kozal 224). The slow transition would break the current societal norms within surrounding suburban areas allowing for current townspeople to adjust while the new residents and families are opened to multiple new opportunities in fantastic school districts, slowly defeating the current segregation problem and education system breakdown.

When home values are raised in a poor community it is more likely people will not be able to pay their higher rent or mortgage causing people to default or be evicted which make it harder for children in those families to obtain a decent education if they become homeless. Putting better supermarkets or fixing houses to better condition makes the situation worse poor communities need to natural raise it's property value which again beings with the children. Once the children become adults who hopefully have a better education and a decent job they may begin to either leave these communities for better ones or repair their home to livable standards, communities need to reconstrued naturally by its environment not forced

As the streets become crowded with the “begging mothers” and whining babies, slums multiply and worsen.

There is a shortage of public housing, yet a high demand of people who need affordable housing. The state should allocate funds to build new housing and properly renovate old housing units. This could help get homeless off the streets of Kalihi and into affordable government subsidized housing. The state should also make it a point to spread out these new housing projects. Putting all of the public housing in one place, like Kalihi, definitely increased the crime rate in the area. If the state could spread them out, crime rates would decrease. The state should also work on making these areas safer by continuing night patrols and cracking down on criminal

Matthew Desmond believes that the alternative, a public housing building program, would not work but by bringing in better rent regulation and controlling the greed of landlords might be solve the poverty in low income neighborhood. Also by improving wages and providing decent benefits while reducing the huge tax subsidies handed out annually to the rich.

Crime in the area is low in comparison to other districts in Mumbai, an impressive fact given that the slum has somewhere in the region of one million residents. A scheme to redevelop the slum, funded by private investors (who are attracted to the valuable land upon which Dharavi sits, with its proximity to the railway lines, and thus the rest of India, and its central location in Mumbai –it is close to the new Bandra Kurla financial district) is vehemently opposed by many of the slum dwellers themselves. Whilst they would be given a free and legal apartment on the same site, many feel that they would be unable to earn a living if they were moved from their street-side accommodation into high rise buildings.

Relocation of the residents expresses elements of high economic and social costs with reference to disruptions. The main beneficial aspect of slum upgrading is that the citizens enjoy fundamental right to live under decent conditions. Slums upgrading enables the city to address crucial challenges such as legality and social protection. The act is also essential in encouraging the development of the economy. This is in relation to minimization of the unemployment elements within the urban areas. Upgrading of the slums is also noteworthy in relation to the achievement of quality life. Slum upgrading also aims at reducing the level of criminal activities and unemployment from the economy. The governments need to restructure and change social paradigms in order to maximize the outcome of slum upgrading.