1800 To 1850 Research Paper

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 helped to mend the relationship between the north and south. All the states in the Union were in an argument over what the new states should be - free or slave states. With the conflict steadily rising a congressman came up with a solution to alleviate the tension. This compromise set the tone for the rest of the civil rights time period. It ended after holding peace for a few decades. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 relieved the intensity of the problems between free and slave states’ political power.

After working tirelessly to set forth his Compromise, Henry Clay’s Compromise finally became a law in 1850. Initially, the Compromise of 1850 slit up guidelines about slavery for the North and South. In the North, CA was a free state, the slave trade was prohibited in Wash. DC, and unrelated to slavery, TX lost their boundary conflict with NM. In the South, slaveholding was permitted in Wash. DC, and the creation of the Fugitive slave act. The fugitive slave act gave federal support to slave catchers. Although the N and S both benefitted from the compromise, the North technically gained more out of it. The Compromise of 1850 was significant because it gave the South the Fugitive slave law, and gave the North a new free state, CA—everybody wins!

One of the biggest divisions between the north and south was slavery. The south needed slaves to tend to crops such as cotton, which became a major part of the south’s economy after the invention of the cotton gin. The north, meanwhile, gained an increasingly large number of abolitionists opposing slavery. The abolitionists believed that slavery was immoral and were influenced by former slaves like Frederick Douglass, as well as through literature, including Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Although the divisions over slavery would not end until later on agreements like the Missouri Compromise of 1820 reduced tensions by preventing any new states above the 36 30’ parallel from joining the union as a slave state.

At the time, the land was being put to good use however people quickly began to bring the issue of slavery up in terms of geography. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was passed to try and keep peace between slaveholders and non-slave holders. The

Since Missouri’s population was composed of 16 percent slaves, it would be admitted as a slave state therefore upsetting the balance in favor of the south. Northerners didn’t like this because Missouri was at the same latitude as the free states of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and because of this they feared that it would set a precedent for slave states coming more north. The north and south continued to argue and argue over the issue of slavery. The north accused the south of trying to extend the institution of slavery and the south said that the north was conspiring to destroy the Union and end slavery. To resolve this crisis, congress passed a series of agreements that became known as the Missouri Compromise, which smoothed over the crisis. In 1820, Congress admitted Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state in order to balance the number of free and slave states and to keep order between the north and south. Also, it prohibited slavery in the remainder of the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri. This compromise soon fell apart after it was passed. Missouri drafted its own Constitution saying that free blacks were prohibited from entering their territory. Because of this provision, which was against the federal Constitution stating that citizens of one state were entitled to the same rights as citizens of other states, antislavery northerners

The years between 1860 and 1877 are filled with many developments in the views of the American people. The North consisted of free states based on an industrial economy while the South based its agricultural economy on the enslavement of colored males and females. The two sections of America had two very different views on how the United States should become a world power. Constitutional developments such as secession of the Southern states in 1860, the Emancipation Proclamation, and other acts and amendments contributed to more discontent throughout the country. Developments such as the Black Codes, Freedmen's Bureau, and the creation of the Ku Klux Klan contributed to the Social aspect of the argument. Problems like these had been amounting

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 impacted many individuals by having different views on whether slavery should be expanded or abolished. It also impacted the U.S as whole by having an agreement that no territories from the north of the Missouri’s southern border could enter the union as a slave state. However, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 had a significance of the first attempt to find a solution to the issue of slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was yet to make an impact on how slavery was beneficial to the U.S or not. Thus, for The Missouri Compromise of 1820 impacted the U.S heavily on how the issue of slavery should be solved, furthermore how slavery should be divided among the south and north territories.

Missouri compromise 1820- In addition to the deeper moral issue posed by the growth of slavery, the addition of pro-slavery Missouri legislators would give the pro-slavery faction a Congressional majority.

After getting freedom from Great Britain, there was a big concern on how to run America and its government. It was not an easy decision how t was planned , however people thought of it as dividing the nation into two separate sections; the North and the South. Throughout the 19th century, conflicts arose between the North and South because both the North and South did not agree on the same things; the North and South had many differences mainly because of how they would make their growth in business and whether slavery would be a part of their economy or not. These differences between both the North and South made the tension between both sections unavoidable and eventually lead to the cause of the Civil War.

Henry Clay created the Missouri Compromise in 1820 along with the Compromise of 1850 to try and keep America together. The Missouri Compromise helped keep the balance of “free states and “slave states”, and the Compromise of 1850 defused confrontation between slave and free states during the Mexican-American War. During that time period, the South never politicized their stance on slavery. In his speech to the Senate on February 12, 1833 Henry Clay said “it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state” (A). Along with this, it was said at the Anti-Slavery Convention of 1834 that “we concede the Congress under the present national compact, has no right to interfere with any of the slave states (B)” even though they opposed slavery. According to the documents, early political stances did not threaten the act of compromise, but after dislike for the Compromise of 1850 from both the North and South (the North because of the Fugitive Slave Act and the South thought it was unfair), slavery started to threaten the nation’s political disintegration. The tension that had been caused carried through the 1860 election; if you lived in Southern states you couldn’t vote for Lincoln if you wanted to, he wasn’t even put on the ballot. Slavery and the division it caused between the North and

While the Compromise was initially created to reduce tensions, it unfortunately added more. Admittedly, the controversial Compromise did manage to delay the Civil War by a few years, but neither party was fully satisfied during that time. They were not completely happy because the Compromise’s five measures did not cater entirely to either side. The South was unhappy about California’s admission as a free state and the North had extreme issues with the Fugitive Slave Law. The North was intensely heated over how the law set the anti-slavery movement back through its requirement of abolitionists to assist in the returning of runaway slaves. In addition to this, free blacks accused of being runaways were denied a trial by jury. The North saw this setback as a reason to fight against slavery - and the South - even harder. This newly reintroduced anger was the opposite of what the Compromise of 1850 wanted to invoke. On the other hand, the South felt as though the Compromise supported the North more than them. The slave trade in the District of Columbia would have to end, the Utah and New Mexico territories were not guaranteed to allow slavery, and California would be a free state, all of which seemed like major losses to the South. By now, the bad blood between the North and South was nothing new, but it was certainly reinvigorated with the help of the Compromise of 1850.

The North’s actions of abolishing slavery and enacting tariffs caused the South to fight in hopes of preserving their way of life and economy. Plantations in the South were only successful because of slavery. Without the slaves helping them create the abundance of cotton, the South would have no economy. The country’s economy would be greatly altered if slavery was eliminated both from a consumer and producer perspective. When the North did announce that they wanted to completely eradicate slavery, the South was taken aback due to the fact that the whole country would not function without slavery and the cotton produced. The North wanted the South to industrialize but the South replied “… we must ever continue to be, wholly dependent upon agriculture and commerce (South Caroline Protest Against the Tariff of 1828).” The climate in the South did not allow for the same industrialization to occur as it did in the North. Plantations and their productions of cash crops were booming in the South and the northern frontier was too small of a market, therefore leading them to sell to foreign countries. This caused the North to enact tariffs and in order to prevent the South from being too successful and lose them as a market. The North ended up petrifying the Southerners into fighting a war in order to preserve their way of life and thriving economy.

The period of Queen Victoria's Reign on the late nineteenth-century was a remarkable stage to printmaking processes. Great Britain might had one of its greatest moments in time for the development of book publishing during that age, and some notable illustrated novels came from that period. That was thankfully achieved in response to the printing expansion in London.

During the years leading up to the civil war, the issue of slavery was the main focus of most politicians. The people in the North were anti-slavery and wanted slavery to be gone forever. The people in the South, some who owned slaves, thought that slavery was a okay and that it should be legal. One of the first laws passed that had to do with slavery was the Missouri Compromise in 1820. In early 1819, Missouri applied to become a state of the union. At this time, there were 11 states that allowed slavery and 11 that did not. This balance was crucial because it meant that there was equal representation in congress for both sides. But Missouri would become a slave state, tipping the balance in favor of the South. To address

In the late 1880’s to 1920’s Americans were starving, diseases were being spread, and social problems rose from the effect of modernization of cities. These effects caused many people to think about what the future would be like and hoping it would be a better world. Many authors wrote utopian novels imagining what the future holds hoping for a perfect society in which they are criticizing the inadequate society they live in. During the 19th century authors wrote about feminism, and issues that the economy has brought and provided solutions to make an ideal society. The issues that were going on in the 19th century and what authors criticized are some of the issues we face in the contemporary world, including discrimination, racism, unemployment poverty, and education.