1905 Revolution Essay

Tsar Nicholas II and 1905 Revolution The Tsar (Nicholas II) survived the 1905 revolution. However, the revolution in 1917 did remove him from power. When asking why Nicholas II survived 1905 there are numerous factors to examine. Both revolutions had extremely similar conditions. Levels of dissatisfaction, strikes and the country moving towards a wartime economy are all examples.

The workers began rioting for better conditions and the police could not contain the chaos. At this stage it seemed patent that the Tsar and his government would be overthrown by the revolutionary forces unless serious changes were made. Hence, the 1905 revolution may not have achieved its objective of other throwing the Tsar however did contribute as an affect of what later brought the Tsarist regime to a collapse.

In 1905, the social and economic tensions building up within Russia boiled over into Revolution. It was described by Lenin as the “Great Dress Rehearsal” for the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and may give us clues as to why the 1917 revolution started. The suggestion that Tsar Nicholas II and his actions were to blame for this revolution is debatable and there are many factors such as the repressive Tsarist system, the growth of opposition from the time of Alexander II and the defeat in the war with Japan to consider. These events can be separated into short and long term effects on the revolution. Bloody Sunday and defeat to Japan would be short term effects whereas the

This led to instability in the government and resulted in people seeing reformist groups as an easy way to create change. And therefore people resulted in violence and uprisings put pressure on the Tsar creating a tense revolutionary ready Russia.

One of the main reasons that the 1905 revolution failed was because the October Manifesto merely only satisfied the middle classes’ appetite for reform. However this was only a short term change in government therefore it was not really a revolution because the changes were not permanent. To add, the readiness of the liberals to accept the government’s political and economical bribes indicted that they were not genuinely ready for a revolution at this time. Furthermore the duma did not have as much power as the tsar portrayed them to have. They were not able to pass laws and did not have any control on the state’s finance.

The Russian Revolution actually has two important parts to it the February Revolution (March 1917) and the October Revolution (November 1917). The February Revolution, which took place in modern day St. Petersburg, was lethal to the royal government of Russia. It began with the bread, it was not like they did not have the supplies for the population, “the problem was the breakdown of the transport system” (Figes 68). The February Revolution was also largely caused by the ineffectiveness of the Russian military in World War One and the failure of the Russian empire throughout the last couple decades. The people of Russia were ashamed of the military throwing away their lives and having to eat sparingly to survive the winter. Peasants were so poor they could barely afford a piece of bread for a week. Mass demonstrations were held in the squares and violence took to the streets. People ambushed the royal guards in front of the palace and they were shot down by the insignificant force left to guard the capital. The revolution was largely leaderless as Russian people just wanted food

The Russian Revolution is a series of political events that occurred during the years 1905 to 1924. The February Revolution, in which overthrew the imperial government and the October Revolution, placed the Bolsheviks in power (britannica.com). The Russian Revolution happened because of discontentment of with the tsar, poverty in Russia, and lack of control over the government. During the In January of 1905, protesters were protesting in front of the winter palace because of extreme poverty and starvation due to peasants’ wages decreasing. The Russian workers and peasants wanted a better working and living conditions. More than 1000 protesters were killed and injured after the tsar, Nicholas the II, ordered his army to gun down the protesters. This incident, known as Bloody Sunday, led to the 1905 revolution. During the 1905 revolution, Russian Social Democratic Social Party split into two factions, the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks. Later in October of 1905, Nicholas the II issued the October Manifesto, which ended the Russian Revolution of 1905. In July of 1914, World War I begun which caused the Russians a lot of damage because four million Russian soldiers killed, wounded or captured. The Russian Soldiers refused the fight and people back in Russian were starving because of the lack of income from the war. World War I also caused the tsar to lose control of Russia as the war has caused chaos in Russia. Soon, continuous protests and revolts led to the March Revolution of

The 1910 Revolution in Mexico was the first of Latin America’s great 20th century revolutions. The revolution prompted a political system that gave way to an unmatched stability in Mexico for more than half a century. The political, social, and cultural effects of the revolution triggered the formation of the PRI, the agrarian reform, a new relationship with the United States, and in turn the consolidation of national identity through cultural policies. In looking at these effects of the 1910 Revolution, we can determine why developments in Mexico today are so important to the United States and characterize current bilateral relations, given such a deep-rooted complex U.S.-Mexico relationship.

The Mexican Revolution was greatly influenced by the peasants in the villages. Conditions like haciendas run by Europeans or mestizos lead to exploitations of peasants and reform laws that lead to the Agrarian Revolution of the peasants. Agrarian Revolt in a Mexican Village focus on the village of Naranja, through Paul Friedrich historical analysis of this town, we see how the conditions like hacienda led these people to mobilize against Porfirio Diaz.

Revolutions occur every day. Some as minute as a change in schedule or as impactful as uprooting governments. The French Revolution did just that; uprooted its very own government. The lasting impact this revolution would have in Europe extends all the way into today’s time.

Revolution was part of Russian life. There had been uprisings and revolutions throughout its history. The 18th and 19th centuries saw a big push toward “Westernizing” the country but as long as there were serfs; Russia could never truly be Western. The serfs were the biggest dilemma that the Tsars faced. The happiness of a people can gauge whether a ruler stays in power or not. The majority of Russians were serf peasants, dependent on their overlords for their bread and board. Their overlord was dependent on the serfs, the Tsar dependent on the nobles for their devotion and taxes.

Marxists would later turn into the communist party. The czar was completed unaware of this discontent until people came to his winter palace to protest, many were killed by the czars soldiers. He created the idea of a parliament, called a Duma, people could vote for the members of this committee. The country had calmed down a little bit after this addition to the government. A few months later, Germany declared war on Russian. With a withered army, Russia suffered a hard loss. Some soldiers for the Russians were so angry with the czar that they switched sides, and fought with the Germans. Nicholas was still oblivious to the threat over his reign. He received a letter from a member of the Duma complaining about the horrible state of the country, but Nicholas thought nothing of it. The czar realized how serious the letter was when everyone in the streets was angry with him. Wanting to keep his life, he abdicated. Nicholas offered the throne to his brother. An intelligent man, he declined the offer.

In the latter years of the eighteenth century, France was an aristocratic bureaucracy, presided over by sovereign monarch Louis XVI. France was ruled under the Ancien Régime; a social and political system established by the French in the early renaissance period of the fifteenth century, until the late eighteenth century where it was violently overturned in the French Revolution. ‘ Under the Ancien Régime the richer a man was, the less he paid.’1 The French Revolution, beginning in 1789 was an era of social and political upheaval that saw the collapse of the absolute monarchy and its prejudice class system. Before the French Revolution of 1789, France was subject to a social division dictated by ones circumstance of birth and wealth. The

Rural areas began to realize that they were in a dangerous game with starvation and disease epidemics; a change in manufacturing needed to occur. People were tired of making products at home and not at an efficient fast pace. Also, the reliance on crops was dangerous. If the crops failed, malnutrition would happen. Most of society already lacked enough food.

The 1905 Russian Revolution was caused by contributory factors such as the long-term and short-term problems in Russia. Some long-term effects were the growth of the reformist groups like the social democrats the social revolutionaries and other liberal groups that had formed around that time. Another long-term effect was the instability of Russia- autocratic rule and repression which were characterized in the reigns of Alexander the III and also in the reign of Nicholas II. However, 1905 is characterized by two primary short-term effects which is the development of the