preview

1969 Apollo 11 Moon Landing: True Or Fake?

Decent Essays
Open Document

The 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing, the first thought that might come to mind is, It’s a great moment in American history and It’s real; but in fact, it’s actually fake. Over the years since the moon landing, evidence found by people all over the world is starting to accumulate, and it’s all pointing towards that the moon landing is in fact fake. The United States had a reason to need to fake the moon landing - to beat Russia, so could that reason really make them fake the moon landing? Evidence such as a flag moving when there is no oxygen, having multiple light sources, no blast crater or dust when the ship look off and landed, no stars, a mysterious C on a rock, and running in gravity, are main things people normally point out. So, moon …show more content…

Then why did the flag wave, and why does it look like the astronauts are running when you speed up the recording? While and after planting the United States flag on the moon, you can obviously see how the flag has ripples and how it waves. Flags can only wave when there is oxygen, which can only mean one thing - it was on earth. The moon has absolutely no oxygen, so there can be no other explanation as to why the flag moved. When people were inspecting the Apollo 11 video, they noticed something strange. When they slightly sped up the recording, it looked as if the astronauts were running on earth's gravity, and the same goes with when they were driving the rover. Could NASA have possibly slowed down the recordings to make it look like they were walking on the moon? If so, does that means NASA did in fact fake the moon landing, but where and how did they film …show more content…

Shadows that are in the same place but going different directions means multiple light sources, right? Well, then why would there be multiple light sources on the moon? The only light source is the sun, which means all the shadows should be doing the same way, and not in different directions. Which means if there are different light sources that means the landing is definitely fake, and the light sources were probably stage lights. NASA claimed to have shot at many locations on the moon, but all the ‘different locations’ were all the same. ‘Different places’ on the moon, or was it really the same movie set on Earth. Speaking of movie sets, when setting up props, people normally mark the prop with a number or letter, so they know where it goes. In a picture taken on the moon, there is a rock where you can obviously see the letter C written on it. Logically speaking, a rock cannot possibly have a letter on it without it being carved in by a human, or the rock is simply fake. So, the moon landing - more like a movie set. But what about the takeoff and

Get Access