preview

2.4 Control Vs Non Control Case Study

Decent Essays

2.4 Control v Non control
People can perceive the risk as high if they do not feel that they have any say or control over a situation. They are less afraid if they feel that they are able to have some control over the outcome of the process. I.e. participation in a public meeting.
2.5 Fair v unfair
The public perceive the risk as being unfair if an area was chosen due to economic reasons. The association between socio-economic characteristics and residence in the vicinity of waste sites has been well documented in both England and Wales where these types of developments, are, usually, proposed or sited in areas where health inequalities, inequity and deprivation exist. (Friends of the Earth, 2004; Walker et al., 2003) (13), (44)
3. Approaches …show more content…

(43)
The early encouragement of a wide range of stakeholders participation allows for ownership, a wider generation of ideas, varied perspectives enabling a clearer view to be established of the community and ensure that decisions that are being made are reflective of the community values.
It also allows for stakeholders concerns to be understood and addressed as well as the opportunity to identify and demonstrate aspects of risk that may have been over looked along with possible benefits that may be available.
Connections can be forged within the community with people that would not necessarily interact thus bridging the social capital breaking down barriers so that people from all walks of life are equal and valued the same. This can be achieved through participatory stakeholder workshops etc. to keep the stakeholders involved throughout the process. (11)
4. Communication of …show more content…

The presence of certain types of risk can cause concern amongst the public especially if they are uncertain about the outcome.
Studies have shown that there is a real concern relating to the health risks associated with incineration but there have been no conclusive epidemiological studies to confirm this. (41), (18), (28),(31),(33)
It is important to take into consideration the publics life experiences in order to put risk into perspective and present it in a way that the particular audience will identify with. (7)
Psychological studies have shown that a person’s perception of risk can be influenced by the number of fatalities but also by other qualitative factors. (38)
Risk communication can be an effective way to develop communication programmes within a community enabling the risk and exposure to be conveyed to the public. (26)
Effective communication is under pinned by openness and inclusion, early involvement of stakeholders and public can help to uncover any concerns and allow them to be addressed early on, as well as deal with different and conflicting opinions.

Get Access