2. Outline the Advantages and Disadvantages of the Securitisation of Bank Loans.

The banking industry consists of almost sixty-five hundred banks that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Out of these, there are eighty-one substantially large banks in the United States that are publically traded, which is where the market structure and industry information will be based. However, as with the rest of the country, these banks are very concentrated, with the largest banks accounting for over half of the market as well as accounting for the largest amounts of revenue.

Is that make loans or buy bonds with long maturities are relatively more exposed to credit risk. Foreign exchange risk, is the risk that exchange rate changes can affect the value of an FI’s assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. FIs can reduce risk through domestic-foreign activity. Liquidity risk, is the risk that a sudden and unexpected increase in liability withdrawals may require an FI to liquidate assets in a very short period of time and at low prices. Can be day-to-day withdrawals by liability holders are generally predictable. And are usually large withdrawals by liability holders can create liquidity

Before the advent of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in 1933 and the general conception of government safety nets, the United States banking industry was quite different than it is today. Depositors assumed substantial default risk and even the slightest changes in consumer confidence could result in complete turmoil within the banking world. In addition, bank managers had almost complete discretion over operations. However, today the financial system is among the most heavily government- regulated sectors of the U.S. economy. This drastic change in public policy resulted directly from the industry’s numerous pre-regulatory failures and major disruptions that produced severe economic and social

Accordingly, banking regulators assessed minimum values for each of these key measures. At 2007, “adequately capitalized” (i.e., minimum) levels were 4% for the Tier 1 capital ratio, 8% for the total capital ratio, and 3% for the leverage ratio; “well capitalized” levels were 6% for Tier 1 capital, 10% for total capital, and 5% for leverage. Well capitalized banks qualified for, among other things, lower premiums assessed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Undercapitalized banks (e.g., below the 8% minimum required total capital) received a warning from the FDIC; continued violation of capital requirements triggered further regulatory costs, including intervention or (in the extreme) takeover by government regulators.

The rules require banks with assets of over $50 billion to hold up to 3% of their proceeds in cash or highly liquid securities in order to avoid bank failure in the case of another crash.

True. I believe risk management has become one of the primary concerns for bank management. Banks deal with an overwhelmingly large number of exchange securities, for example, ( loans, treasury bills, forex trading, ect...) This causes bank managers to have skills to properly analyse and manage what securities they trade and what type of contracts they enter into, ( such as in hedging etc...). If banks do not shift their focus on such new financial instruments they might go bankrupt as a result of excessive risks in such securities. Hence the focus of bank supervision has shifted to risk management, rather than on capital requirements. Although both are key to running a successful bank.

In 2008, one of the worst financial crises since the Great Depression occurred. The severity of this collapse cannot be understated as demonstrated by the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, the fourth largest investment bank in the US, and with many other financial institutions such as Merrill Lynch and the Royal Bank of Scotland having to be bailed out. In addition, the Global Banking System was within a whisker of collapsing and if it where not for the trillions of dollars invested in the system by national banks then this banking collapse would have lead to economic catastrophe. Therefore, in order to avoid such a calamity from occurring again, it is important to ask the question why did this financial recession occur and what factors contributed towards this downfall? Although there are many reasons as to why this recession occurred it could be argued that securitized lending and shadow banking played the largest role in this economic crisis. It is therefore important to understand what securitized lending and shadow banking means. Securitized lending is the process by which a financial institution such as a bank pools illiquid assets, such as residential and commercial mortgages and auto loans (by which the bank receives from the public through house mortgages and loans), and loans these newly formed short-term bonds to third party investors in exchange for cash or collateral. Since its creation in the 18th century, securitized lending was increasingly popular and very much

One of the primary feature of the Global Financial Crisis, as well as other previous financial crises, was the build up of excessive on and off-balance sheet leverage in the banking system. The force on the banking system to reduce its leverage caused a forced decline on asset prices worsening the feedback between looses, deterioration in bank capital and the reduction of credit availability. The framework introduced a leverage ratio requirement, fixed at 3% (actuaries.asn.au, 2011), which aims to constrain leverage in the banking sector, and introduce additional protection against model risk and measurement error. This will help alleviate the risk of the deleveraging processes, which can damage the financial system (bis.org, 2010). The introduced leverage ratio will be a reliable extra measure to the risk-based requirement.

Firstly, the Dodd–Frank Act pushes forward the reformation of America's financial regulatory system. Several new regulatory authorities are set up to enhance the government supervision and administration of the industry. The Financial Stability Oversight Council is established to identify material risks to financial stability, with the support from Office of Financial Research. Moreover, Fed is entitled to exercise additional superintendence beyond banks.

The Dodd-Frank Regulatory Reform Act is one of the most influential regulations in response to the financial crisis. This acts primary focus is to prevent future financial system collapses, by reducing excessive risk taking by financial institutions and by protecting the consumers (Rose & Hudgins, 2013). In addition, the Dodd- Frank Act gives the Federal Reserve the authority to monitor financial institutions and gives them the power to restructure or liquidate firms that are financially inadequate (Investopedia, 2010). Fortunately, since the 2008 financial crisis a number of new regulations have been enacted, the Dodd-Frank Act is the most monumental new regulation, because it seeks to prevent future bank bailouts and the risky behaviors of financial institutions. While these regulations may not be enough to fully prevent another financial crisis, the necessary steps have been taken to minimize the disastrous effects of overt risk taking by financial

Recent studies have investigated the impact of the 2007-2009 financial crises on banks’ capital. Berger and Bouwman (2011) emphasised the importance of capital during financial crisis. Their empirical study concludes that banks with solid capital base have some benefits during the crisis than those that are poorly capitalised. Well capitalised banks are more able to withstand the shocks due to liquidity squeeze, and therefore had higher chances of surviving the crisis period. Other benefits accrued to well capitalised banks include increase in their market share and profitability, as customers withdrew their funds from less capitalised to a well-capitalised banks. This conclusion was also reinforced by a recent empirical study conducted Olivier de Bandt et al (2014) on a sample of large French banks over a period of 1993 – 2012. Similarly, Gambacorta and Marques-Ibanez (2011) demonstrate the existence of structural changes during the period of financial crisis. They conclude that banks with weaker core capital positions, greater dependence on market funding and on non-interest sources of income restricted the loan supply more strongly during the crisis period. Using a multi-country panel of banks, Demirgüç-Kunt, Detragiache and Merrouche (2010) find among others results, that during

Purchasing options, forward, or future contracts. In this way the bank can reduce the uncertainty in the future by entering into an agreement with set terms for a specific date. Thus, if the interest rate moves in an unfavorable direction, the bank has the option to use these tools in order to mitigate the impact of the change on its balance sheet.

Securitisation is one of the most fundamental and complex concepts in the world of finance. The non-existing industry began in the 1970s when home mortgages were pooled by U.S. government-backed agencies. Ten years later, financial institutions and businesses from all different aspects used

•Yan, A., Nandy, D., and Chemmanur, T. "Why issue mandatory convertibles? Theory and empirical evidence, February (2003) Retrieved on 18.3.2008 (http://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/nawm04/456.html)•http://www.investorwords.com/5362/yield.html. 18/3/2008.

The financial services industry is highly competitive and constantly evolving. Not long ago, terms such as collateralized debt obligations, credit default swaps, and synthetic collateralized debt obligations would seem like a strange foreign language. But today, they have risen to become an increasingly larger share of our industry. It’s no secret that these types of financial instruments played a significant role in the financial crisis of 2008-2009. However, they are a necessary evil and must be part of any viable growth strategies in the financial services world. We must take similar risks in order to maximize our profits. That’s