2012 PISA Report Essay

One of the greatest differences among public schools is the funding they receive. Public schools across the country have incredibly varied amounts of capital dedicated to them which in turn leads to a disparity in the quality of education a student will receive at these schools. The race of a student, the location they live in, and the wealth of their family greatly correlate to the level of education they will receive. As Harvard professor Jennifer L. Hochschild notes, “Districts with a lot of poor students have lower average test scores and higher dropout rates...The highest spending districts report high test scores, and some of the lowest spending districts report the lowest test scores” (“Social Class in Public Schools.”). The students who attend schools that receive less funding typically obtain an education that is lesser in comparison to schools that receive more money. The inequality in funding within a state has a severe impact on the variation of education quality. In the case of Connecticut, “The district that spends the most provides almost twice as much per student as the district that spends the least” (“Social Class in Public Schools.”). As a result, the schools that receive less funding work with more outdated textbooks and equipment, while schools with more funding can afford to buy new equipment and provide a better environment for the

School funding is a mix of different funding sources like federal, state, and local. About ninety percent of funding for education comes from state and local community. K-12 education has failed to keep up with high enrollment. Schools must spend to counter effects of poverty while many European countries alleviate these conditions through government spending. Currently more than forty percent of low income school get an extremely unfair share of state and local funds. Low income school are receiving inadequate funds for their school, whereas other schools in the United States are unfairly distributing their state and local funds. That is unfair to the low income schools because those schools really need the money for school books, field trips, etc. Funding for public schools has been quite unequal for years, but even though Americans are fully aware of this issue no one does anything to solve it. Researchers are trying to show them both sides of this unequal funding issue in public schools in order to help balance the distribution of educational funding.

In this article the author explains how the schools are based on a class system and higher-class areas have better recourses and more classes offered. Higher-class societies have better equipment, new technology, modern facilities, better books, and better teachers. Not only are the school’s educational facilities better the extracurricular activities are also better. For example sports facilities, training facilities, band, art, all because these lower class schools cant afford what these lower class schools can. Students in lower end districts are actually ending up worse off then the higher end students. Meaning attrition rate, drop out rate, sat scores and much more.

WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are warned that the following assessment may contain images and names of deceased persons.

Check this footing size with Table 3.3 in AS1684.2 or Table 3.1 in As1684.4. What is the footing classification type?

Many schools in the Unites States are far behind compared to other countries. School systems are corrupt in many ways causing the children who want to achieve in their academic goals fall behind. Parents are starting to fear about what school will live up to their standards of education. Unfortunately, students do not have a choice to be always put into private schools because of financial problems. Therefor, these students are then placed in their local public school that could or could not be succeeding academic standards.

It is increasingly argued that quality in education cannot simply be determined by local factors in schools but depends on social, political and economic factors that often go beyond the local context.

According to Albert Shanker (1993), it is not possible to compare student achievements in public and private schools. However, it is popular belief that students who attend private schools are more equipped for college or the workforce. Also, there is some debate that public schools should rise up to the standards of private schools. In my opinion, the only difference between public and private schools is prestige. Not all public schools are the same, but the Americans need to start challenging the public education system. Therefore, the concept of my show is very relevant to the issues in our society.

In the 2010-2011 school year, the U.S payed 632 billion dollars on “education”, with almost a third of said funding going towards athletic and club funding. Finlands government spends the equivalent of 10 billion dollors on actual education funding, and no money on extracurriculars, so if students wish to participate, they must pay for these extra morning or afternoon events, not interfering with school at all. South Korea’s educational funding, but still spends x amount of dollars on education, and none at all on sports or extracurriculars. The compilation of extraneous education funding takes money away from schools for things like new books, better

American elementary schools are mostly scoring on the top of the distribution, middle schools score a little above average, but the high schools score below the international average. These students have shown that they are not doing very well in some school subject such as math and science. In 2003 there was a study on OECD data that would compare all of the worlds 15-year-olds that was based on two measures which were participation and belongingness. Which was to see how often students attended school, if they arrived on time, and how many would show up for class. In some countries such as China, Japan, Korea, and Germany showed that students would show up for school and attend their classes more than most students in the world.

In America, there is a lot of money that goes towards education but some school districts get more money than other school districts. America spends the most on education than any other country but they are not distributing the money the right way. Money is not only the problem with education but the gap between

shows that Machiavelli views the concept of truth not as something that is necessary among all men, like Socrates does, but as an action that should sometimes be avoided by a prince, because it often

Thesis Statement: Private school students are more likely to have a better viewpoint in learning, a firm stance in education, and will be more successful in colleges than of public school students.

As time has gone by, Americans have increasingly paid more attention to the schooling process, trying harder all the time to get the best education possible for their children. As a result, more parents are turning from the public school systems to the private schools. This happens for several reasons. First, students that graduate from private schools tend to be better prepared for college. Second, private schools open up many opportunities to succeed in the business world. Last, the private schools allow the parents and the student to decide which school they feel will give the student the best education possible. Overall, private schools offer a better education for high school students than do public schools.

Thus, the competition is fierce. In public schools, a highly intelligent youth may graduate first or second in his or her class, whereas if they attended private school their graduation rank may be fifth or sixth. Sadly, some graduating seniors from private schools feel that a public school education would have presented more college options.