2016 Presidential Election

How presidential candidates present themselves in the media can be proven to impact election results dramatically. Political figure using social media did not start to become more common until after the 2008 election because Twitter and Facebook were just recently created, but by looking at data from the past two elections it shows that the news presidential candidates put on their social media can correlate with how people will decide to vote. After researching what topics political candidates post and how they present themselves in the media with election results it can be established that a candidate’s presence in social media can have an impact on how people might vote in an election. “By 2008 candidate websites were standard and campaigns

More and more people are getting their news from social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, Tumbler and many more, and candidates are using this to their advantage. This election is probably one of the first were candidates have actually used social media sites as their direct communication line to potential voters. Social media today had gone from gossip and family pictures to a location for political strategy. Thanks largely to trumps regular social media first declarations and its actually working particularly with the younger voters. A study released last year from the Pew Research Center that Marissa Lang cited showed that “Among 18- to 29-year-olds, nearly two-thirds said social media is the most helpful means of learning new things about politics.” (Lang, 2016). Even if the candidate isn’t the one posting the video or message in the end it will still end up on social media. For example, Trump had announced his plan to ban all Muslims from entering the united states in South Carolina not on social media however it found its way there and spread like wild fire. This sent those who were outraged to respond in disgust and those who encouraged it to share it so that their friends could see and so on and so on. Even if those who shared it did it to

The 2016 United States presidential election is coming to a close with five candidates left running for the seat. But only three of them gets the most attention of the mass media. One Donald J Trump who is a multi-Billionaire, TV personality, and a businessman. The other former first lady who is running for a second consecutive time since her lost to president Obama back in 2008. And then there is Bernie Sanders a state senator from the great state of Vermont. These are all great candidates for the presidency of the United States but they all have their flaws that make the voters vote for the other candidate. Like Hillary Clinton I would not vote for

The answer is: the American people are tired of the old, played out political system that’s full of failed accomplishments and broken promises from politicians that care only for the vote not for the people. What the American people want in today’s political structure is someone separate from the common political policies of today. The people want someone they can relate to; they can not possibly relate to the rich, snobby, elite in our politics today who are most of the time born into privilege. So candidates like Donald Trump and Ben Carson, despite having absurd views toward society, are seen as more favorable in the eyes of the public, therefore more popular, because they are untouched by the traditional political system that America has followed since the very creation of this

During the 2016 Presidential campaign between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, there were many campaign advertisements from both sides that strongly resonated with voters. Clinton’s role model ad, for example, sent a powerful message by illustrating Trump’s substandard behavior as a presidential candidate. On the other hand, Trump’s “Hillary Clinton won 't Change Washington” ad demonstrated Clinton’s ineffectiveness as a leader as well as being part of the problem and not the solution. For example, one of the reasons that Trump was able to win the 2016 presidency was to increase voter turnout from the white working class male by connecting Clinton to the Washington elites. As a result, this paper will be examining the effects and implications that both of these campaign ads had towards the electorate in terms of how each candidate’s message played a role in the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election.

The United States presidential elections are this year, 2016, in November. As a student, a citizen, or an aspiring politician, it is a good idea to know a little something about the presidential candidates. At this point in the race there are only five people left that are running, Donald trump (R), Bernie Sanders (S), Ted Cruz (R), Hillary Clinton (D), and John Kasich(R). One might want to know the issues of each candidate, which party they are affiliating with, how they plan to go about fixing these issues that we have, and the ultimate question will they be best suited for presidency. I narrowed which candidates I want to research more on, down to Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.

Throughout American history, it is clear to point out the United States have elected presidents to stand as the countries’ leader since the birth of the young nation. In most cases, the election is seen as a race between two parties even though there are others on the ballot. The vast majority usually did not know much about the other candidates until the turn of the century. Then, when media and information became easier to access it turned these elections into social media wars putting candidates at each other’s throats. The best example of this is the current election and their unruly debates, but when these debates came about they were not as cutthroat as they are now. Media throughout the years has forever altered the way in which these debates have gone about and how the presidential candidates are perceived. Media has tarnished the way politics and debates are run today from how they began.

There have been 43 presidents in which they had to go through the same election process as the two popular presidential candidates in 2016, those being Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Some candidates have done some stupid things that would cause controversial statements about being a presidential candidate and others have been prepared since they were young to be president. The way a candidate presents themselves to the people who are voting really matters because if a candidate does not appeal to the voters there is no chance one will win the candidacy. In order to establish which presidential candidate is the best in the 2016 presidential elections. I believe Hillary Clinton is the best president candidate in 2016. But in order to determine that one has to analyze each individual’s past from when they were young to mid adult life and to the present. This will allow one to understand their stands, their character, and their potential as future president.

In this Presidential Election, the Republican Party is a disadvantage in Florida due to the large concentrations of voters in major cities. The majority of the state votes for the Republican candidate, but big cities like Miami, Orlando, and Tampa always seem to vote for the Democratic candidate. In the 2012 election between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, Mitt Romney won all but thirteen counties but lost in majorly in the urban areas where Barack Obama won an astonishing number of the votes. For Donald Trump to stand a chance, he must focus on the rural cities with a large number of Conservative and Independent voters and has a low voter turnout.

On November 8th, 2016, something horrible happened to me and every citizen of the United States. Donald Trump the most evil, misogynistic, racist man in the entire world, was elected as President of the United States. Since then, America has fallen into the depths of Republican Party beliefs, hatred, and attacking CNN a fair and balanced news outlet.

The 2016 presidential election was one of the most controversial elections to have ever faced the American people. Both major political parties ran on completely opposite platforms which caused the American people to be divided more than ever on policies and beliefs. In fact, the outcome of the election took the media, the American people and the world by surprise. This only divided the American people even further. The Democrats were certain that their candidate, Hillary Clinton, was to be the winner over Donald Trump. History though proved everyone otherwise with the loss of Hillary Clinton. Many analysts claim that the Democrats' loss of the presidency was due to FBI director, James Comey's letter, the media's

The U.S. presidential elections are the most important events in all of American government. There are many differences and similarities when elections are compared throughout history in the United States. The 19th century was a time when the presidential era was considered nothing more but a job. The presidents was not held to the same standards as he (or she in the future) is in this day and age. Little effort was made in regards to publicly addressing an audience or making the general public happy. The president was merely seen as a civil servant. Congress was considered the most important part of the government’s because it controlled the federal budget and legislation. , the president is considered the voice of our country and is equipped with power that was not seen in the past. Differences and similarities in presidential elections of the late 19th, early 20th century and with the elections of today are present. Campaigning and debating are all comparable areas of presidential elections throughout history. One of the most interesting elections in recent memory was the Presidential election in 1992. This was a time when America had achieved something historic by achieving the greatest victory in modern American history. How did the commander-in-chief defeat the Iraqi Army and then lose an election to a unknown Governor from the poor state of Arkansa? A great campaign,

An election for President of the United States occurs every four years on Election Day, held the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The election process begins with the primary elections and caucuses and moves to nominating conventions, during which political parties each select a nominee to unite behind. The nominee also announces a Vice Presidential running mate at this time.

Over the past seven decades, this nation’s voter turnout has been dismal. The presidential election in 2012 had a voter turnout of about 57.5%. That means a little over half of the voter population did not voice their opinion on who should be the nation’s president for the next four years in the voting booth. If this continues, there will be a president whom the general public may not want but could have prevented if all they did was vote. However, the upcoming presidential election seems to be different from previous elections just due to the massive amount of attention it is receiving in the media. Fox news had their largest viewer turnout when airing the republican debate, hitting a record of nearly 24 million viewers and the same goes

“FDR used radio, JFK used television, President Obama used the internet, and Donald Trump was very adept at social media, but more so in my mind understanding cable news,” Dylan Byers explains at the beginning of a panel put on by the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. Some form of media has been around through most, if not all, election cycles since the beginning of our country. I think that the media played no more a role in this election cycle than they have in the past, but they were not able to effectively present it in a fair and balanced as they could have. The candidates just used them to more of their advantage, or disadvantage in some cases. The media was only doing their job, covering popular stories and informing the public.