21st Century Foreign Policy Essay

Throughout the course of history, the United States has remained consistent with its national interest by taking many different actions in foreign policy. There have been both immediate and long term results of these actions. Foreign policy is the United States policy that defines how we deal with other countries economically and politically. It is made by congress, the president, and the people. Some of the motivations for United States foreign policy are national security, economics, and idealism. The United States entry into World War I in 1917 and the escalation of the Vietnam War in 1964 and the both had great impact on the United States.

He believed that the Bank has to be abolished due to several reasons. First of all, the bank concentrated the nation's wealth in a single institution which created an unhealthy for the economy monopoly. Second of all, he believed that the bank favored the wealthy over the common people. The third reason was that the bank had too much control over members of Congress. In other words, the subsidy of the bank to one particular party or the lack of the finance could influence the results of the elections at some point. And the bank also favored northeastern states over southern and western states. Thus, Jackson succeeded in destroying the Bank by vetoing its 1832 re-charter by Congress and by withdrawing U.S. funds in 1833. This action led to federal money being put into state banks who then loaned it out freely leading to inflation. State banks were issuing paper banknotes that were not backed by gold or silver reserves which led to rapid inflation. Moreover, the expansion of credit and speculation took place. As a result, state banks collapsed which was a cause of the Panic of 1837. However, despite the crisis and depression, the liquidation of the Bank was an achievement of Jackson’s presidency and led to trivial of the economy later on.

The United States has a long history of great leaders who, collectively, have possessed an even wider range of religious and political convictions. Perhaps not unexpectedly, their beliefs have often been in conflict with one another, both during coinciding eras, as well as over compared generations. The individual philosophies of William Jennings Bryan, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, with regard to America’s roles in world affairs and foreign diplomacy; are both varied and conflicted. Despite those conflicts however, each leader has left his own legacy behind, in terms of how the U.S. continues to engage in world affairs today.

Andrew Jackson, whose presidential term lasted from 1829-1837, was the first president to ever be chosen by the people to lead. Because he was not born into a rich family, people felt that they could relate to him better. He too preferred supporting the common public over the wealthy aristocrats. During Jackson’s period in office he was able to shift the majority of power in the United States to farmers and small businesses in the western part of the country. Jackson vetoed many bills in order to benefit common people and also created the spoils system to balance out his cabinet. Like Jefferson, Jackson was extremely opposed to the Bank of the U.S., believing that it would only make the wealthy even

For Jackson, it was primarily the issue of the National Bank. The Bank was supposed to give out credit, create a unified currency, and control the government’s money. This was opposed by Jackson because he thought it was unfair of the government to control this money because it mainly helped the elitists. He wanted to completely destroy it so not only elitists could benefit and it created some drama for the 1832 election. Henry Clay along with Nicholas Biddle wanted to Bank to be rechartered but it was vetoed by Jackson. This led to the Bank being a key component in the election. Biddle and Clay wanted the Bank to remain because they believed it was economically good, but Jackson opposed it because it was politically bad. Jackson won the reelection and got a new Secretary of Treasury, Roger Taney, to remove the funds from the Bank and thus basically destroy the Bank. Document 1 is of the Report of the House Ways and Means Committee to the full House which talks about how the economy did before and after the National Bank was destroyed. The purpose of the report is to show how Jackson did not do what was good for the economy and the nation. It says that “whereas, in the two short intervals during which no national bank existed, public and private credit were greatly impaired…” which shows the ineffectiveness of having no Bank. It actually didn’t help the

Andrew Jackson believed that the US bank placed too much control into the hands of a wealthy few. He believed the Bank of the United States was a tool of the rich to get richer and he believed it gave private bankers the power over the nation's economy. Due to this fact, Jackson vetoed the bank’s recharter in 1832, and he declared the monopolistic bank unconstitutional. In attempt to benefit the lower, working classes, he placed the federal money in “pet” state banks. This attempt destabilized the national currency, decreased currency in markets, and displayed favoritism in Jacksonian policies.(page 286) Also, the Specie Circular in 1836 a complete disaster.

After shutting down the Bank of the United States in 1836, President Andrew Jackson did not receive what he had hoped for in exchange. The Bank War surely had a profound effect on the future of the United States including everything that led up to the panic of 1837. Bray Hammond in his essay The Jacksonians: Expectant Capitalists states how Jackson's advisors blinded him to facts and the actual usefulness of the bank. They allowed Jackson to destroy the bank instead of correcting its flaws, a decision that would later create an economic boom in the United States. Many believe that Jackson allowed himself to also be blinded by his ego and agrarian beliefs which resulted in profound consequences in the end.

had to have daily check ups from health officials for a total of 21 days straight. These policies

Jackson did not always do the right thing. When Jackson fought against the Second Bank of the United States, he contributed to the panic of 1837, a severe economic depression. When Jackson attacked the Second Bank of the United States, by moving the bank's funds to state banks, the banks used the funds to help people buying land. In turn, this caused inflation. In the summer of 1826 Jackson tried to slow the inflation by ordering Americans to only use gold or silver to buy land.(Deverell and White, 292) After Van Buren took office in 1837, the Panic of 1827 happened. People blamed Van Buren, but Jackson contributed to the Panic.(Deverell and White,

In Jackson’s quest for control solely by the people, he targeted the national bank. He believed that, “ great evils to our country… might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people (Doc F).” Basically, he felt that the bank should not have such control that it can swing government legislature to benefit it’s shareholders. Jackson waged a war on the bank and as a result pushed the country into a recession that would affect the economy for decades to

Andrew Jackson's economic policies, including his views on banking during the mid-19th century had a rather large impact on the United States during the time. Jackson was a president who thought himself to be a protector of the "common man" and that certain rights and privileges should be enjoyed by every citizen. However, in attempting to doing so, Jackson's economic policies such as his veto against the National Bank, his use of "pet banks" to deposit government money instead of the National Bank, and the passing of the Specie Circular, created a government that was limited in every regard, resulting in great economic instability, contributing to the Panic of 1837. The Second Bank of the United States faced

Andrew Jackson’s economic policies and views on banking during the mid-19th century’s impacted the United States economy negatively. The closing of the Second National Bank created an uneasy economy that put all federal funding into state banks and left the United States economy susceptible to economic depression and his creation of the Specie Circular caused the panic of 1837. Andrew Jackson economic policies and views on the national bank took an economy that was working efficiently, after the Era of Good Feelings, and weakened it immensely by removing the National Bank and implementing poor economic policies.

When running Jackson founded the party called American Democracy. His party stood for an unintrusive government, and his personal mission was to give more power to the common man. He took power away from congress to do so. The national bank system was put in place by Alexander Hamilton during Washington’s presidency. When Jackson took office he chose to create pet banks. These were small privately owned banks that were not regulated by the government, which took power away from the government and put it into the hands of the common man. This gave them jobs and made it their responsibility to keep up with the money that was being put into them.The intentions that Jackson had for the middle and working class were good ones that he struggled to

In fact, an entire political party, the Whig party, was created in opposition to the severe amount of authority Jackson commanded during his tenure in office. Jackson was seen as a tyrant by many, abusing the powers granted to him by the Constitution and taking liberties that he should not have been allowed to take. His tyranny was such that he was coined “King Andrew I” by his enemies. Jackson’s goals of minimizing federal involvement in state affairs took a bad turn when he decided to wage war against the national bank. Some of Jackson’s financial policies, especially his veto of renewal of the national bank’s charter, directly contributed to the Panic of 1837. While Jackson preached that “every man is as good as his neighbor,” he did not seem to consider the Native Americans “men” in his definition as he fought fervently to force them off land that was rightfully theirs. Jackson again showed his tyrannical nature when he fought off the Supreme Court’s three separate rulings that the Cherokee Indians were entitled to their land on account of treaties that were made between American and Cherokee governments. Jackson advocated the uprooting of more than 100,000 Indians

During the Cold War from 1946 to 1990 the United States had formed a policy called the containment policy which was adopted by President Harry Truman. The containment policy was a doctrine uniting military, economic, and diplomatic strategies to turn back communism and to insure that America would hold the leading role in world affairs.