2nd Amendment Rights Essay

The issue of gun control has come up lately as a hot topic on what the nation should do. Many people are asking whether guns truly are the useful tool that large amounts of us have been stating they are, or are they just murdering machines. In my opinion, guns are our assistants in a period of emergency when help is too far away, or not able to come. Instead of putting more limits on guns, we should keep up the ability to secure ourselves and our fellow Americans. As we investigate gun control, you may begin to try to question why we would even consider using such useless means. The possibility that restricting the capacity of the magazine or controlling the kind of gun you can buy or not buy is the issue or completing something

parameters of a preexisting assault weapon ban to reduce the legal limit for rounds of ammunition a

· Many public shootings could be prevented if it was harder to obtain weapons such as guns.

In the article, Alan Berlow made it clear from the abstract of this article that there should be limitations with individuals who have gun ownership. He also talks about how the database of firearms accounts for a small

The government already has many laws that prevent citizens from purchasing them. “Gun laws exist at the federal, state, and local levels, each implementing a particular and distinct set of laws regarding certain rules and regulations on the possession, carrying, and purchasing of firearms” (A Full Overview of Gun Control). Innocent citizens are not the problem, criminals are. There are laws established that forbid certain people from acquiring guns, but yet they are still able to acquire them. If the delinquents break the gun control laws now, they will still break stricter gun control

The ban on high-capacity ammunition has been in effect since 2000, but people who attained the high-capacity rounds before the ban were allowed to keep them according to Ballotpedia.org. However, this will be changed if proposition 63 is passed. Ballotpedia.org also states that “Proposition 63 would remove the ownership exemption for pre-2000 owners of large-capacity magazines.

In 2015 a bill was proposed to ban a type of ammo called AR-15. But, the majority of the House of Representatives and also of the Congress, has decided to oppose to those bill, and vote “no”. Many of them had this position for believing that, by prohibiting people to buy a specific kind of munition, they will be inflicting their right to bear arms.

There is almost 300 million guns in America. The problem is that guns can be bought very easy legally and illegally. The person that sells the guns has to be able to evaluate the customer, “the legislation, which failed last year, could be revised to emphasize the mental condition of potential gun buyers. ” said by Senator Richard Blumenthal (Reuters). After the Sandy Hook shooting, Barack Obama put more attention on gun control. Many citizens want to have tighter gun laws and some want the guns to be banned.

Specifically for convicted stalkers, violent convicted criminals, and people convicted for having alcohol or other drug in their position or caught distributing them. With this being said this act will help the government to regulate who is able to have a firearm in their position. When you make the ammunition and guns harder for criminals to get them and easier to charge them if they do have a firearm in their position. So with making it harder for criminal to have guns it should reduce the rates of gun crime.

The number of mass shootings in 2012 has led many lawmakers to consider further gun control reform. One option would be to reinstate the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which would make it illegal to manufacture assault weapons for civilian use. New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is also suggesting required background checks for every gun sold, stronger enforcement of straw sales (discouraging people to buy firearms for somebody who is not allowed to possess one), and a requirement for states to enter criminal and mental health records into the federal background check system.

The purpose of gun laws in the United States is to protect citizens from being victims of gun violence. Within the last few years, several incidents have occurred where innocent individuals were killed just out of outrage. President Obama is working to have some type of policy put into place to reduce the number of crimes caused by guns. Also, this policy would reduce the number of individuals allowed to buy firearms due to felonies or other illegal matters. Not only would the sale and possession be regulated with gun laws, the use of firearms would also be regulated. Many Americans do not agree with this policy; however, its purpose is not to offend or hurt anyone. This policy is to help save innocent lives and reduce the number of individuals who are able to purchase or come into contact with those weapons to hurt others. The following information will include an overview of gun laws and the history behind gun laws along with social, economic, and political analysis.

As a response to the San Bernardino Shooting that took place four months ago lawmakers in California are introducing five new bills that are limiting our second amendment right to bare arms. These laws would create more restriction when it comes to owning guns. The bill restricts the sale of semi automatic, centerfire rifle. People who already own these guns will have to register them. They are also outlawing rifles with a detachable magazine because “Since 1980, 435 people have been killed in 50 mass shootings involving large-capacity magazines, some of which can hold 100 rounds of ammunition. Gun supporters are heavily opposing this bill.

The magazine capacity is ten rounds. It is unlawful to possess a bullet containing an explosive substance designed to detonate upon impact or possess any armor piercing ammunition with intent to use against another. Along with New York’s restrictive gun laws, New Jersey also has some of the strictest laws in the nation.

There should be a gun laws on the type of weapons that an individual can own and limits on ammunition that would effectively lessen the impact of any violent acts. There are a vast array of weapons that are available on the market from the fully automatic M16 to the semi-automatic Dessert Eagle (Stokes, 2013, para. 6). Nonetheless, the weapons are not the problem until they are loaded with deadly ammunition that kills or injures almost instantly. To make matters worse, those who do violent crime couple firearms with huge amounts of ammunition and sizeable magazines in preparation for mass murder. In one case, a man by the name of James E. Holmes was able to acquire over six thousand rounds of ammunition for which he would later use inside

Many tragedies of mass shootings have occurred over the past years. Since there’s really no kind of regulation for how much ammunition the average person could purchase. Therefore, prop 63 would be something to come into consideration. The government should require background checks to prohibit possession of large capacity ammunition magazines because it’s a safety hazard for the daily life of a citizen, there should be a limitation for the average person, and can prevent an incident. Although prop 63 may violate the second amendment society’s safety and regulation should come first.