Many scholars believe that because 3 John is the shortest book in the New Testament it is the void of any doctrinal content.The paper sets out to argue that 3 John is deeply doctrinal but it is embedded within the author's view of the character of God and his plan for the world. I must confess that as I read 3 John I did not grasp the message.It was only after reading the article a few times I was able to comprehend the 3 John. The article explains that in order to understand this letter we must dig deep into the background, and find the author's intentions and the reaction he expect from the recipient. 3 John seems to a reply to a previous letter,which we no access to.In letter the Elder commends Gaius for supporting the missionaries who have arrived,even at the cost of his excommunication. The elder speaks of Diotrephes who has rejected his authority and placed himself leader, refusing to help missionaries, and threatening anyone who supports them. Although this letter was not thought to offer much deep theological reflections, Lieu found that it cast a light on the early patterns of ministry.It was by using a socio-narrative analysis,and rearranging the letter,we were able to grasp the big picture.When were introduced to John Searle's speech- act theory we saw how communication carries a force that affects and changes the receiver's behavior. The idea being that by reading 3 John and looking closely at the events surrounding the story we are able to get a clearer
Even early church writers contested the validity of what Luther referred to as an “epistle of straw”, even denigrating it as a leftover from Judaic writers. Even recent commentary writer Sophie Laws referred to “the epistle of James is an oddity. It lacks almost all of what might be thought to be the distinctive marks of Christian faith and practice.” The Luther casts further doubt on the authenticity of this epistle.
The third section dissects the formation of the New Testament with more historical context and views of other writings defined as Gnostic writing. Bruce explains the spoken words of the apostles carried as much authority as their written words and gives an in depth explanation how the Gospels and Pauline writings were viewed by the Church Fathers. The rest of the section demonstrates the Church Fathers and their views of what was to be considered scripture and the councils that affirmed the inspired scripture.
Growing up as an African American in a white world in the late 1800’s was incredibly ruthless. Even after slavery, blacks had a hard time trying to get work, education or civil rights. Education was a major topic in debate for blacks and whites. Education, the most important thing in life, acts as the key to a person 's future. Education leads to knowledge, and knowledge leads to power. It teaches humans how to prosper and make good decisions. With a good education, people hold the ability to achieve all types of goals, and more doors will open for them. African-Americans held every right to obtain this basic human right. White and blacks took on many different paths with education and W.E.B. Du Bois tell a short story about it all.
In the first close reading of the text, I discovered Paul articulated his desire for all believers to be of the same attitude or frame of mind as Christ. Creating a sense of relationship with God through the example of the servanthood of Jesus. This study revealed the traits of Christ’s life and character found in verses: “he was formed of God” (2:6), “emptied himself’ (2:7), “in human form” (2:8), “name above every name” (2:9), “every knee should bend” (2:10), and “every tongue confess … glory to God” (2:11). Looking at each verse, challenged me to read between the lines and wonder what might be happening within the church of Philippi. Textual Criticism
When considering the strengths and weaknesses of the book, the strengths dramatically outweigh the shortcomings. Allen succeeded in showing the reader that there is no excuse to discount the ministry of Paul as irrelevant in today’s missionary setting. He powerfully implemented scripture throughout the book with precision. Every verse, story, and biblical example of Paul’s practices and teachings that Allen used were necessary and served to back up his claims with ultimate truth. Also, the open addressing of his opponent’s arguments served to strengthen Allen’s thesis in a way that a simple stating of facts would be incapable of
This review article is about the essay written by William C. Placher and it has been oriented from a reading assignment from a class. Sir William has managed to illustrate his meticulous thinking about the Bible. In this astute exposition, Placher contends for a model of scriptural power which is wealthier than that found in either what he calls "scriptural peculiarity" or radicalism. He keeps up that the message of the Scriptures is dependable when rightly comprehended (recognizing contrasts in type, social setting, and view of history), and he urges perusers to get sufficiently comfortable with the content to comprehend it accurately.
Looking back at project 3, I felt very happy with the essay I produced. I am not one to enjoy writing since I usually do not feel very confident in my writing. I felt the work I produced through project 3 was one of my best. I put a lot of effort into this essay and it showed in my final draft. With this being said, after comparing my essay to the rubric I gave myself a 3.64 overall on this project for many reasons. This essay in no means was perfect, but I learned from my strengths and weaknesses.
Success is the act of achieving something, success usually comes following the practice for the desired event. We have all heard that you can only succeed with practice and preparation, which is a true statement; to my knowledge. However, some feel differently towards this statement they either feel that success can come with either natural talent, or pure luck. With this being said, I can understand why some may feel this way, but the truth of the matter is that it's a necessity to practice and practice efficiently in order to succeed.
In the fall of 2018, I will be attending John Carroll University to pursue a degree in Biology. In addition to obtaining my degree in Biology, I am also looking forward to the liberal arts opportunity at John Carroll to leverage my leadership and social skills to fully develop as a well-rounded individual.
Part one introduces the most perplexing of the Johannine riddles. After an outline of the Gospel of John, Anderson presents the threefold riddles: theological, historical, and literary. Anderson considers familiarity with the points of contention a requisite for engaging, addressing, and interpreting them. Chapter one exposes the central features of the Fourth Gospel; which effectively reveals the dissimilarities between John and the Synoptic Gospels. Chapter two uncovers the theological riddles of the Fourth Gospel, both “incidental” and “highly significant.” For the twelve theological riddles presented in chapter 2, Anderson conveys the work of Johannine scholarship as well as presents his own incisive exegesis. Anderson does likewise in his presentation of the historical and literary riddles in chapters 3 and 4. The first part successfully establishes the
Throughout the history of religion, there have been men who have left a remarkable works to the world. St. Paul who accepted the calling of God to be his disciple is one of these great men. He has written a prestigious letter to the community of Colossians in order to correct their beliefs. In this work I will try to investigate the background of the letter, and discuss the motivation that caused St. Paul to write to this letter to the community of Colossians.
Our source of knowledge of the apostolic work of Paul comes first from the Book of Acts. The epistles written by Paul serve to further our knowledge of his mission. These letters were written to churches that he had founded or churches that were known to him. Luke’s account of Paul introduces us to the basic facts about this important biblical figure. A more complete understanding of Paul’s journeys can be gleaned from his letters. These epistles were written almost at the time they occurred and they comprise some of the earliest works contained in the New Testament.
Here are the three insights that I discovered when reading our textbook and the book of John. My first insight:
Johannine literature truly portrays Jesus as God, with the theme of His deity interwoven throughout numerous passages. In this respect, John’s style differs from the other four gospels, as Bickel & Jantz (1998) point out that the other three had been written prior to John’s gospel, therefore, “he wasn’t interested in just retelling the events” (p. 222). Since Jesus is the focal point of Scripture, a scholar of the New Testament with uncertainty concerning Jesus’ oneness with God will fail to perceive the crux of Christianity. Therefore, in spite of its importance, John does not focus on Jesus’ entrance into the
This essay will show contrasts in views on the Gospel of John regarding authorship,dates, and the relationship between John's Gospel and the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Some comparison of thought, concerning composition and life setting, will also be presented.