30 Day Eviction Notice: Case Study

Ms. Doebler is requesting that Mr. Hoskins leave the residence citing past assaults and past violent verbal

The reporting party (RP) stated there is a belief that the licensee and Maria Dickerson are committing fraud. According to the RP the licensee is never available. The RP stated Maria Dickerson lives in the licensed home with her son. The RP stated when they arrive to the facility Maria is the person providing care within 10-15 minutes the licensee would arrive at the home. There were a few occasions when the RP made visits she only communicated with the licensee over the telephone. The RP stated the licensee never answers the phone call made to (916) 806-8085 however, the licensee would return calls made to that phone number.

Eviction, while it hurts the family the most, also takes a toll on the communities in the form of ingroups and outgroups. In his book, Evicted, Matthew Desmond says, “Eviction even affects the communities that displaced families leave behind. Neighbors who cooperate with and trust one another can make their streets safer and more prosperous”(p. 298). To make those streets safer and to develop trust and a sense of security, in-groups are created by those in the neighborhood who talk to each other often and form a friendly relationship. Eviction can break that relationship and sometimes result in the removal of the security and trust in the ingroups. It also creates worry about what the next renter will be like. When that renter moves in they

R/s the contractors stated that they can’t work in the home because there is too much crap in the home. R/s contractors said that there is clothes, food, pot and pans everywhere. R/s there is so much stuff throughout the kitchen you can’t see the counter. R/s he filed for eviction of the family and the court date is September 6th.

The Landlord Tenant board (“LTB”) is tasked with addressing conflicts arising out of the rental of residences. The conflicts between landlords and tenants can be determined by adjudication before the tribunal through an oral hearing or mediation that is overseen by a board mediator. When you make an application to the LTB, they will schedule a hearing date. On this date you can arrive and will be given the option to engage in mediation on site. Mediation can only occur if both parties agree to participate. If both sides agree you will engage in mediation first, and then a hearing only if mediation is unsuccessful. Parties may have legal counsel as a representative during the mediation. As counsel it may be beneficial to contact the other side prior to the hearing date to determine if they wish to partake in mediation. Counsel should however be prepared to engage in a full hearing before the board should the other side change their mind about mediation, or in the event mediation is unsuccessful. If an applicant has filed their application with the board prior to obtaining legal counsel or new issues have arisen since the time of application, it is important to note that a hearing can only address what was submitted in the application. Whereas mediation is able to tackle any issues regarding the tenancy, even those not originally contained in the application to the LTB. If the mediation is successful parties can themselves

On Tuesday March 8th, 2016 Case Conference with Resident Ebony Rice #325 has been conducted with Janette Chirico from DHS , Program Director Felicita Rivera, Housing Program Supervisor Zenobia Garland and Senior Case Manager Ms. Arias. The purpose of this meeting was to address client noncompliance and to come with an exit strategy for this Ms. Rice. Client was asked the reason for her missing ILP meetings and her barrier to obtain permanent housing. Client has a LINCH voucher for the amount of $1515. Client stated that she hasn’t receives any help from facility staff so she is searching for apartment on her own. Ms. Rice has been receiving assistance by the onsite housing department but unfortunately she has been able to link to an apartment

I basely terminated my Pensacola Housing Voucher Program. The reason why, I left Pensacola, FL was to come back to my mother's house of resident in Tallahassee, FL to help her and myself for health issues. In addition, I did the terminated in Pensacola, FL before I came to Tallahassee. At my mother we did not see eye to eye, so I decide to move out. Therefore, I call Pensacola Housing, and they wise me that 10 days have passed by so that terminates me out of the Housing Voucher Program. However, I was wise; I have the rights to appropriate judicial proceedings. Furthermore an attorney is the only thing can get me back on the Housing Voucher Program if not I will have to get back on the two year waiting list again. By having an attorney sending

CCIB Intake received e-mail from John Merrill regarding the initial complaint. The information is the same as the LIC802. LA City Fire Department of the location being problematic due to the number of request for medical assistance. There is a resident who is diabetic and a victim of strokes and kidney failure. He is reported to be in need of care and supervision. He was ordered by the Court to be placed at the location and is assigned to a Probation

Getting served with an eviction notice can really disrupt your life. If you have been served with an eviction notice on your home in New Jersey, you can fight back against your landlord to keep your home.

Although Plaintiff claims Ms. Miner provided bad references to prospective landlords, Ms. Miner has done nothing of the sort. In fact, policy mandates providing copies of incidental reports, repair notices and notices of delinquency (unpaid rent) by the tenant; Ms. Miner was simply acting in compliance. Accordingly, Ms. Miner did not discriminate against the Plaintiff in denying her leasing application, but merely

REVIEW ILP AND CLIENT RIGHTS AND CLIENT CODE OF CONDUCT: Client is not compliance with the saving contract. CM advises the client to comply with the Shelter Rules and DHS Code of Conduct. Client must adhere to the shelter 10pm curfew. Client is scheduled for Conference Meeting to address her non-compliant with the Saving Contract and Apartment Search

Supplying civil legal services for eviction to the borough of the Bronx will show the city and the rest of the country that Civil Gideon works. The borough of the Bronx has the highest eviction rate in the entire NYC from 2006 to 2013. The Bronx is also well documented as a place ravaged by poverty. However, the Bronx has administered civil legal service for eviction with some degree of success. From 2005 to 2008, the South Bronx supplied legal assistance for housing court preventing evictions in close to 90% of cases. The cost to New York City is estimated around $450,000, but saved the city $700,000 in shelter cost.

We represent Thompson Laurie DiNoto, the Tenant, under that certain Residential Lease dated July 3, 2017. You are hereby notified that Mr. and Mrs. DiNoto rescinded the above-referenced Residential Lease under the terms of which they took occupancy of Lily Unit #127. This rescission is made on the ground that (1) the Premises are not in a tenantable condition; (2) the monthly rent charge of $7500 was substantially in excess of the advertised rate of $6,000 per month in violation of Business and Professions Code sections 17200 and 17500, as well as section 43(A) of The Lanham Act; (3) the Residential Lease is unlawful in that it omits required disclosures under federal and state law.

CCIB Intake received a call from resident Eugene Kunz DOB 2/8/24 in room #6. Mr. Kunz call to state he wanted to remove his daughter Joyce as his Power of Attorney (POA) and pay his $3000 rent each month. According to the caller he has residing in the facility for approximately 3 1/2 years and wanted to return to his home, however due to his slight dementia he was having difficulty with his memory and therefore could not return to his home. Conversely the caller described how his daughter would have him examined by physician who would give him 3 words at the beginning of his examination and at the end would ask him the 3 words. Unfortunately the caller could never recall the 3 words and thus was unable to return to his home. Recently the caller

Those who have experienced evictions are forced into multiple logistical housing situations. Due to the stigma associated with a court-ordered eviction, landlords would often engage in rent screenings to ensure that potential renters not only have a “clean” criminal record but also an eviction “free” record (Desmond, 2016). As Desmond discusses (2016), the landlord’s double barrier screening is shielding their neighborhood from criminality and poverty. Correspondingly, some landlords knowingly do not engage in these screening practices as a “business model” to potentially profit off of the poor (Desmond, 2012a). As the person who is evicted fall into the bottom of the rental market, the housing fate of the evicted