360 Paper

2. Starbucks enjoyed strong financial performance in 2011. The company did not explicitly attribute this, but with an 8% rise in same store sales it seems that either the consumer market bounced back, or Starbucks made changes that attracted more consumers. The company feels that it offered better products and a better experience at its stores. The company also credited operating efficiencies and tight control of spending for improved profits. In addition, the company continued its global expansion, which improved the top line, and used the economies of scale it generated as part of its cost control program.

In the current business environment, companies must take strategic initiatives to prevent the losses and overcome the rough economy we are currently facing. Starbucks Corporation (furthermore, Starbucks) is known as one of the leaders for the retail sales of roasted and specialty coffee. Starbucks is focused on creating a detailed strategic and financial planning that can take the company to the next level. The aim of this paper is to investigate Starbucks’s actions upon creation of strategic and financial plans, and its impact on cost and sales and risks associated.

The determinants of Starbucks profitability over time are variable costs and fixed costs. “A variable cost is a cost that change in direct proportion to a change in the level of activity (dict). Variable costs for Starbucks would include labor, coffee beans, dairy, and plastic products. A fixed cost is indirect costs of business expenses that remain unchanged (dict). Fixed costs for Starbucks include rent, taxes, and insurance as well as advertising. In the figure below (fig 1) we have Starbucks financial data in millions for the year of 2015. This includes their operating expenses, net revenues, such as company-operated stores, licensed stores, CPG, food service. It also includes their total net revenues and their balance sheet. As we can see “Operating costs dropped in the fiscal year

Starbucks financial statements were analyzed for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2015. Like all public companies, annual and quarterly financial statements are required to allow regulators and other interested parties to analyze the financial status and management decision making of the company. This analysis focuses on the results of Starbucks most recent published annual report containing their balance sheets, statement of earnings and cash flows. These statements will be analyzed against the results of one of its competitors, Dunkin Donuts, to investigate how the two companies compare to each other. It was noted that Starbucks and Dunkin Donuts do not have corresponding fiscal year ends. The data therefore is not directly comparable since the reports do not reflect the same time period of data but should provide additional insight. The paper will attempt to provide a brief analysis of Starbucks operations in terms of its liquidity, leverage, activity, profitability and growth ratios used by analysts in the industry.

Starbucks Corps had its gross account receivables for the year 2015 increase by 14.44% which led to its net receivables increase by $88,000,000 which translates to an increase of 13.95% of the net account receivables. This was followed by an increase in doubtful debts through the previous year by 6.12% to %6,700,000 from the ear 2014. This is due to the increase in the number also sales which led to the increase in account receivables and also doubtful debts in 2015. The risk that the company undertook also increases in line with the increase in account receivables.

Net income is total revenues minus total expenses incurred to generate those revenues all within the same reporting period. Net income is calculated by the accrual accounting methodology meaning that the expenses incurred to generate revenues are reported at the same time the related revenues are reported. Both revenue recognition and expenses paid may not coincide with actual cash transactions. Net cash from operating activities, on the other hand, is not determined by accrual but by

In this assignment, a savvy financial analyst researching companies in which to invest a U.S. publically-traded company that would be a good investment was chosen. After a lengthy search, a company that my family is unduly familiar with, Starbucks, was chosen and in the following pages a financial analysis will be described.

The Auditor’s report is designed for the Board of Directors and current Shareholders and Potential investors Starbucks Corporation.

Organizations develop a myriad of strategies to help direct their company towards reaching its vision and goals. One such level of strategies, business-level strategies, involves determining how an organization is going to position itself and develop a competitive advantage within a market (Hill, Jones, & Schilling, 2014, p. 154). These strategies have implications for an organization’s ranking in an industry, their ability to attract suppliers and consumers, as well as their financial performance as a whole. One way by which an organization can assess the financial ramifications of their business-level strategies is to evaluate financial ratios. Financial ratio analysis allows managers to compare certain values against one another, as well as the values between companies (Crawford, 2012). These ratios evaluate such things as an organization’s profitability, debt, liquidity, and operations. In analyzing these ratios, organizations can see how their business level strategies affect the financial health of the organization over the long term. This paper sets out to evaluate the financial ratios of Starbucks and determine what this says about the ramifications of their past, current and future business-level strategies.

Starbucks’ financial position can be figured out by studying their balance sheet. A financial item that can be found on the balance sheet is accounts receivable. Accounts receivable refers to money owed to a organization by its borrowers. Horizontal analysis can be used to assess an item on the balance sheet. Starbucks’ accounts receivable increased from $561.4 million in 2013, to $631 million in 2014. That is a 12% increase in just a year. Accounts receivable is categorized as an asset on the balance sheet. In 2013 the accounts receivable was 4.8% of total assets. In 2014, the company saw a 5.8% increase in their total assets. Overall, the accounts receivable jumped up by 12% in 2014. Starbucks allowance for uncollectable receivables is calculated based on histroalical experience, credit history, and application of the specific identification method. Uncollectable receivables are not available on Starbucks balance sheet. There are however, fixed aseets on the balance sheet such as plant, equipment, and property.

In this paper, I will talk about Starbucks Company. I will define the influence of the vision, and mission of the company and primary stakeholders along with their overall success. An examination will be conducted to categorize five forces of struggle and their effect on the corporation. I will carry out a SWOT analysis to determine the opportunities, threats, strengths, and weaknesses. Founded on the SWOT analysis, a technique of opportunities and advantages will be exploited while threats and weaknesses will be diminished. Several types and levels of techniques will be talked over to operate the profitability and competitiveness. I will outline a plan of communication to make approaches known to all investors. Two corporate authorities will be designated to assess the efficiency of the regulating managers. I will also assess the effectiveness of management within the Company and come up with sanctions for upgrading.

Since January 2008, Starbucks has taken steps to address the deterioration in the US retail environment revitalize its global support structure. These steps have been designed to structure the company’s business for long-term profitable growth. Because of the continued weak economy and decreased customer traffic, as well as the cost associated with the store closures and other actions in its transformation strategy, the company’s fiscal 2008 results were impacted negatively in the following ways:

Starbucks’ shares have grown more than 1500% over the past decade. Financially, it has been an oak tree in an ever changing economy with customers that have ever changing demands. However, there has been increased concern for the financial viability of the coffee shop a recently announced plan to close down over 600 stores that were said to be underperforming domestically. That means that more than 1,000 jobs will be eliminated. As scary as that is on the local front to top management, the executive staff feels that it is the only way to recover from it’s shocking $108.7M loss for the 2nd quarter this fiscal year.

Starbucks does not have a lot of long-term debt. There was a point in the mid-2000s where Starbucks was struggling, closing stores and seeing reduced profitability. In August of 2007 the company made its first (and to this point only) debt issue. The issue was for $550 million at 6.25% on a 10-year issue (Trent, 2007). This debt remains on the company's books today, as $549.5 million on the balance sheet in long-term debt.

A financial analyst looking to investigate Starbucks’ statement in more detail, he or she would definitely have to keep an eye on the deferred income taxes, net and the shareholders’ equity section in the balance sheet. If the analyst wanted to investigate the income statement, one could suggest the net earnings and expenses as sections to study.