5 Reasons Why People Share Fake Photos During Natural Disasters

Many human beings think the moon landing was faked because of the pictures. In the background there are no stars in any of the pictures. Even some pictures there is a crater in the back that looks exactly the same but the stuff is just moved. Some pictures in the middle you can even see a line which looks like the bottom of a backdrop.

Today, it is very easy to believe anything seen on the internet. With numerous resources available instantaneously, it is impossible to know which ones are misleading, and which ones are legitimate. In the end, it all comes down to being able to distinguish a fake source, from a real source.

A popular phrase growing up might have been “don’t believe everything you see on the internet.” Many websites, newspapers, magazines, and networks may not present accurate information. A document can display information in a professional manner, but the information itself can be biased, and unsupported by evidence, ultimately making the presented information more of an opinion opposed to factual information. They are certainly hard to find, but credible and unbiased information does exist. “Being WEIRD: How Culture Shapes the Mind,” by Ethan Watters, has every quality that is expected of a credible document, as well as “Why Nice Guys Finish Last,” by Julia Serano, and “The weirdest people in the world?,” by Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine,

On the internet there are hundreds of thousands of different news articles, but not all of them are real. Fake news is a type of hoax or deliberate misinformation that you can find almost anywhere mostly because of social networking platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and News Feed.

Take a look at this study done by researchers at the University of Connecticut in 2005. A group of seventh graders were asked to read information on a website on the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus and evaluate the site’s credibility and trustworthiness. All but one student deemed the site to be credible due to extensive cited sources, pictures, and a wide array of scientific words. The truth? The site was a hoax designed just for this experiment (Galagan). One might ask, why weren’t most of the students able to recognize this? That’s because these students didn’t have a basic knowledge and

If You look at any of the bigfoot pictures anywhere you would see almost the same things. Basically, any picture would have the same thing like it would be so blurry that it looked like the picture was taken on a toaster there all also not focused at all. You don’t really have to look at some of the pictures twice to know that they are fake. Some pictures can look really real but you have to look at the small details like bigfoot is supposed to be super tall but all of the pictures don’t stand out. And you also have to watch out for like masks or tags or zippers.

If you watch any modern television shows or listen to modern media, you realize how many huge occurrences for the world could be thought of as fake or a hoax. Huge networks like ‘Discovery,’ ‘National Geographic,’ and ‘Fox News’ support these kind of conspiracies as well, making articles

During times of tragedies and immense events, we like to be comforted with information that makes sense to us. “Confirmation bias is the idea that we’re more likely to consume and share information that fits with our already-held beliefs”(Willingham 2). Sometimes during a time a tragedy, we cling onto what we find is comfortable. With confirmation bias, the fake news that is served directly to us is what we think fits our prior knowledge. In order to neglect confirmation bias, we need to confront the real situation and not believe what seems plausible(Willingham 2). If you see a shark swimming through streets flooded with water after a hurricane, are you going to believe it?(Willingham 2). Even though people are ranting about how awful the

The article, “5 Reasons Why People Share Fake Photos During Natural Disasters” by A.J. Willingham from CNN.com, it says that people create fake news based on “confirmation bias”, or information is believable. At all costs, people need to protect themselves from this “confirmation bias” so they can avoid fake information. One way they can do this is by checking that the photo or article came from a credible source. If there is a picture on an official news channel’s website, or on the actual news channel, it is most likely a credible source, and a valid photo. Be careful of news photos that are not on a specific news website, because it could easily be a false picture with a photoshopped news background. People have to get themselves out of

From there, the tweet and the photos have dominated internet discussion. There are thousands of comments online of people discussing whether the photo is real or not.

When we watched the BBC: Spaghetti Harvest in Ticino video, I actually believed the video, because it looked real. I knew that spaghetti didn’t grow on trees but I till believed it. I think that people only make fake news to trick people and worry them. When I see news on Instagram or snapchat, I do worry sometimes , only if it is worth worrying about. In my opinion, people making fake news because they think is funny is unacceptable. Because sharing fake news might be a problem. If the fake news is about a celebrity, anyone famous, or anyone in particular, the news can spread, and end up ruining the persons life. Sometimes I do like reading news on Instagram, whether it's real or fake, because news is always interesting,

In the article “5 Reasons Why People Share Fake Photos During Natural DIsasters” by AJ Willingham, it expresses the idea that a lot of what you see online is inaccurate. I can tell that the author’s claim is true because they are using stories and other experiences to show it is true. I can also tell that the author’s claim is true because the author is providing evidence. One piece of evidence i found is in part 3. “The problem? It wasn’t Irma at all. Similarly, fake forecasts and warnings became so pervasive this week that the National Weather Service had to issue a clarification warning people.” This shows the author did their research in order to support their claim for the article “5 Reasons Why People Share Fake Photos During Natural

Photos are just recorded information and how it is presented is actually based on individual interpretation by the photographers themselves. It is not absolute reality because the viewers themselves are not there to witness the event; therefore it is not entirely factual. The meaning of a photo illustration is also dependent on viewers' individual views and assumption. As the old metaphor says, "is the glass of milk half full or half empty?"

While natural disasters such as floods, drought and hurricanes are commonly thought to occur due to environmental forces such as weather, climate and tectonic movements; a deeper investigation into the ‘disaster’ displays other contributing forces. Human factors have a large, if not equal, contribution to the occurrance and outcome of such disasters (Pelling, 2001). As Pelling (2001) argues, there is both a physical and human dimension to ‘natural disasters’. The extent to which the natural occurrence of a physical process, such as a flood or earthquake, impacts on society is constructed by that society, creating a ‘disaster’ as measured by a

“The picture may discort; but there I always a presumption that something exists, or did exist which is like what’s in the picture.” (Sontag). In a photograph that Garry Winogrand capture, there is an adult couple each holding a baby monkey in their arms. This scene was taken in the streets of a busy city sidewalk. Not only is it a strange scene but it would have certainly been hard to believe if you did not see it with your own eyes. However, with the photograph that Garry Winogrand took, there is evidence that that scene actually existed. Even though there is probably an immensely high chance that the same scene would happen again, the photograph will always prove that the small event did exist. Another example would be when Garry Winogrand took a photograph of people laying on a grass field while there are black balloon covering the sky. It is an event that will be hard to duplicate. The balloon was captivating and Garry Winogrand made sure to prove to everyone that it did exist. It was indeed a beautiful sight because there was one single tree within these people and it added to the beauty of the event. Garry Winogrand tried to convey that principle in his photographs because he wanted to proof that these events were actually happening. Furthermore, he wanted to let people know that no one made to events up. With his photographs all the scenes that he saw can be proven