6 Verlegh 's And Steenkamp 's ( 1999 ) Coo Framework

Copyright © 2004 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. All rights reserved. You are hereby authorized to download and distribute unlimited copies of this Executive Summary PDF document, for internal use by you and your firm. You may not remove any copyright or trademark notices, such as the ©, TM, or ® symbols, from the downloaded copy. For any form of commercial exploitation distribution, you must request copyright permission as follows: The current procedure for requesting AICPA permission is to first display our Website homepage on the Internet at www.aicpa.org, then click on the "privacy policies and copyright

The “American Brand” is the belief the United States is an open and competitive society that welcomes innovation and talent from around the world. The “American Brand” attracts people from around the world to get an education in the United States and to start up businesses. According to “Then

Brand equity can also be affected by the perception of brand ethics. By keeping customers in their mind and giving them the first priority, McDonald’s has been trying to provide quick and efficient service without compromising their quality performance. They keep to regulations on food importing rules and as such, is able to keep up with their moral values.

It has been acknowledge (Romaniuk & Sharp 2004) that Brand salience can be defined as the propensity of the brand to be thought of by buyers when they are in a buying situations. A brand awareness strategy depends on how well known the brand is, Brand Salience is forming image to refresh their memory about the brands that can linked to consumer mind as well as the quantity and quality of the cue to brand links (Olson & Peter 2005), it is very important that consumer can connect to their mind as many cues as possible . The level of consumers’ brand awareness necessary to induce purchase varies depending on how and where they make their purchase decision for that product category or form. The brand attitude is focus on evaluating the brand, according to Schiffman and Kanuk (2007) “attitudes are relevant to purchase behavior are formed as a result of direct experience with the product, word-of-mouth information acquired from others, or exposure to mass-media advertising, the internet, and various forms of direct marketing”

As mentioned early in this study, consumers would consider COO as an extrinsic cue to identify product quality and value, especially when they have limited knowledge about particular product. However, there is no agreement by researchers about how to examine COO effect. In previous literature, researchers had examined COO effect by using several methods. More specifically, those methods could be divided into two aspects: single cue and multiple cues. Both two methods will be reviewed in the following two sections.

(3) To explore the importance of COO on consumers’ purchase intention by comparing against other products’ attributes;

Prior studies strongly suggest that the intersection of global brands and iocal cultures produces cultural heterogeneity. Little research has investigated the ways in

Several scholars have researched the process of how COO effects impact on consumer’s perceptions, product evaluations and purchase intensions. It can be explained by the theory of ‘Halo Effect’; ‘Summary Construct’ and ‘Combined Halo and Summary Construct’.

A recent debate on brand management seems to suggest that cultural brands have the ability to instill a contradictory system of values. A key argument in Holt’s (2004) How Brands Become Icons is that brands become iconic because they perform a myth that addresses acute contradictions in the society. Brown et al. (2003) also claim that the paradoxical ‘soul’ of brands provides an opportunity for consumers to involve emotionally with the brands and thereby create the subtle connections that lead to loyalty. Drawing upon several well-known brands, Heilbrunn (2006) shows that strong brands promote an utopian model based on a series of inherent contradictions and paradoxes, which brands are able to reconcile through a narrative program. The contradictory principles, according to the author, coexist in any brand’s discourse. Schultz and Hatch (2006) also refer to four cultural paradoxes and argue that these paradoxes or contradictions may exist in

Howard Schultz, the founder of Starbucks, puts it best when he stated: “If people believe they share values with a company, the will stay loyal to a brand” (Fifield, 2015, para. 8). The values Schultz refers too are defined as “the moral principles and beliefs or accepted standards of a person or social group” (Collins Dictionary Website, 2016, expression 5). In this qualitative study, “Branding in The Global Arena: The Role of Culture” (Krueger & Nandan, 2008) the significance of culture in formulating and maintaining an effective global strategy is discussed. This study by Krueger and Nandan examine branding in the global context, cultural dimensions that affect branding including specific examples from China and India, and key issues for global companies. The purpose of this critique is examinee Krueger and Nandan’s study, by examining the articles key components listed above and identifying strengths and weaknesses of the following; the article’s research purpose, methodology, results, and discussion.

A structured set of people from different geographical background with the craving for a particular brand or product is termed as brand community. In the past people were categorised by their occupation, religion, language and ethnic backgrounds, whereas at present people are distinguished by what they buy and what they are capable of buying. The market must be analysed to strategic brand management due to the dynamics of consumption, individualization as well satisfy collective identity of brand community. Ethnography no longer differentiates people who have a predilection for a brand in common. The brand communities’ exhibits shared sense of responsibility in brand building apart from the marketing strategies initially made by the

Detail “Commercial Brand is a most valuable, if intangible, asset for many companies (Lassar et al, 19995; Pappu et al. 2005). And brand relationship can be defined such as trust and commitment (MOragan and Hunt, 1994; Fournier, 1998; Gruen et al., 2000; Each et al., 2006). According to Douglas and Isherwood that commercial brands have meaning that goes further than its tangible assets, functional quality, and business brand value. This implication relied strongly in its capability to guide and correspond in cultural sense (Douglas & Isherwood, , 1978; Richins, 1994). Furthermore, there is one particular sector or division which has acknowledged awareness in the perspective of commercial brands that is ‘Advertising’; this means it using the combination form of process that suggestion reassign by bring those two together the consumer product and a emblem of culture collectively inside the

After looking back at all the presentations done in the tutorials of International Marketing, I picked up a few topics to reflect in this essay. The first presentation was regarding consumer affinity and covers three parts, which is the definition of consumer affinity, group of consumers that may have consumer affinity towards buying products made in foreign country and the causes of consumer affinity. The presenter explained that people who develop affinity towards a foreign country might do so because they identify with the country’s culture, they find it attractive, or they find that their identification with the country contributes to their social identity (Wongtada, Rice & Bandyopadhyay 2012). The presenter then explained the possible

The consumers and marketers in the emerging markets for who they are and not necessarily compare them with those in the developed markets, such as the emergence of a global cultural identity (Strizhakova et al. 2012), role of country-market characteristics (Bahadir et al. 2015), the growing importance of new middle-class consumers (Kravets and Sandikci 2014) and the differences in attitudes towards local and international brands (Tanusondjaja et al. 2015).

There are companies in today’s global market that rely on branding to sell goods. Clothing brands including Levi’s and Abercrombie and Fitch capitalize on the “Americanness” of the brand they have both worked to create. While these brands may seem second nature to those living in the United States, abroad these brands ooze American culture. Brands like Levi’s and Abercrombie have created a relationship between its brand and the culture from which it came. Abercrombie is essentially selling a brand that is hip to New York Fashions. Levi’s is selling to an audience that believes their jeans are better because they have been created in the progressive city of sunny San Francisco, California. While in reality, these goods are even