Hello Quiotis, Great response, I truly enjoyed your expression to the scenario. The story line was exceptionally fascinating on the grounds that this does happen a lot, especially when a person feels like we all might get into trouble. I total agree with you on the defendant’s was seeing driving all over the road and the officer had a substantial motive to make the stop. The passenger only spoke the truth of course but a prosecutor will try to have it use as hearsay which it maybe. Overall Wallace stated it so 80% of it was the truth. Thank you as well for exploring the 804 rule when applies to the hearsay evidence. Good job. Hi Naithan, I like reading your response, it covered every detail of the scenario. Which was great, I didn’t need to re-read your post. I think the prosecution has a good case, with or without the witness Wallace utterance, my reason are, first the driver was stop for his erratic driving on the road way. After the officer Leonard …show more content…
This rule is planned as an aide for taking care of them. Then again, a few circumstances repeat with adequate frequency to create designs helpless of treatment by particular principles. Hi Charlene, Another one of your great response, I like it. I didn’t look at it the way you would have went with your questioning but I like it, this just showed there are different ways to attack any situation. I like it how on the off chance that you were the judge, asking the prosecutor what is the relevance to his questions. Again you are absolutely right when you said consuming alcohol and driving under influenced has nothing to do with if Wallace loved the defendant. I believed the prosecutor was trying to disqualify Wallace
of care and changes in the patient’s condition to revise the course of medical treatment if
This memo is intend to present appropriate treatment of the ARO estimation problem experienced by the Lack of Information (LOI) based on the findings from interviews with all 50 of the warehouse managers and on-site visits at each of the 50 locations of its warehouses countrywide. The onsite observations search for any evidence of damages in both the on-site property like the roof, walls, floors and general conditions. The interview with the managers obtains information about the characteristics of the warehouses that are not readily observable. The information obtained is very important in the preparation of the fiscal
Trader Joe’s chief executives have been careful in their expanding of the brand to more geographic locations, and they must continue to seek out their target market of “intelligent, educated, inquisitive individuals” and settle around them.
In the past decade, eyewitness testimonies have cast a shadow on what is wrong with the justice system in today’s society. Before we had the advanced technology, we have today, eyewitness testimonies were solid cold-hard facts when it came to proving the defendant was guilty. However, time has changed and eyewitness testimonies have proven to be the leading causes of wrongful convictions due to misidentification. The Thompson and Cotton case is a perfect example of how eyewitness testimonies can put an innocent man behind bars.
The operator of the Pontiac continued pass your Affiant's marked police vehicle in a fast, careless manner and continued around Stamets patrol vehicle at an unreasonable speed. The operator stopped the vehicle beside Stamets who was actively involved in a traffic stop. The operator had her passenger side window positioned adjacent to the driver's door of the
What roles do culture, ethnicity, race, and socioeconomic status play in families' experiences in the healthcare system?
justified. The police officer will testify to seeing an interaction between the defendant, Kelly Roberts, and Parker
On 09/18/2015, at approximately 0058 hours, West Mahanoy Township Police Officer Joshua Pastucka observed a brown convertible driving in a slow manner in front of the Shenandoah Borough Police Department. He observed the vehicle circle the Police Department twice and frequently stopping in his travel. Officer Pastucka proceeded towards the vehicle observed the operator and identified him as Robert CONRAD. Officer Pastucka is familiar with CONRAD and had prior knowledge his license and vehicle registration was suspended. When CONRAD proceeded behind the Shenandoadh Borough Police Department on the second occassion Officer Pastucka entered behind him and made contact with him. CONRAD attempted to exit his vehicle and while doing so he had a difficult time opening the door. Once out of his vehicle he had a staggered gait and stumbled into the quarter panel of his vehicle. CONRAD briefly paused while leaning on the quarter panel of his vehicle and then began to walk towards Officer Pastucka's vehicle. Officer Pastucka instructed CONRAD to return to
It was July 10 2015 a very sunny afternoon when a Waller county cop came in contact with a young woman named Sarah Bland. Pulling her over the cop’s accused Sarah bland of not having her turn signal on when trying to switch lanes to the right. Furthermore after that the cop asked MS. bland for her license and registration. In light of that happening, he walked back to his car to do some paper work. Uniquely a few minutes later the officers come back to the car to ask MS. bland what’s the matter. Likewise responding back, She replied I did nothing wrong. In addition to saying I was simply trying to get over to move out of your way. At the same time the officer asks MS bland can you please put out your cigarette? Above all, with Ms. Bland not putting out her cigarette the cop became crazy. Despite knowing her rights the officer says step out the car with your hands up.
The Defendant, George Tiba (“Defendant Tiba”) and L.A. were both at a local bar, Walrus, on the night of Feb. 16, 2013. Walrus is a commonly known as a college bar, often filled with students from the University of Colorado. Defendant Tiba offered to purchase beverages for L.A. and her friend, who both accepted. Afterwards, Defendant Tiba continued to make inappropriate contact and statements to L.A. during their time at the bar. After a period of time, Defendant Tiba drove L.A. back to her apartment where the offenses occurred early in the morning on Feb. 17, 2013. L.A. went to the hospital later in the day on Feb. 17, where a SANE examination was conducted by a SANE certified nurse. From the evidence collected, the District Attorney commenced
Witness state that vehicle 1 ran the red light heading north on N. State St. and the white Jeep had a green heading west on W. Flint St. One witness over head the driver of vehicle 1 state the light was yellow and turning red when she went through the intersection.
I researched the case of Jonny Gammage. Johnny was the cousin of Pittsburgh Steeler’s Ray Seals and was pulled over on October 12, 1995 while driving his cousin’s Jaguar. Police state that Johnny Gammage “became uncontrollable following a low-speed chase that police said began after a Brentwood police lieutenant noticed Gammage driving erratically at about 1:45 a.m. (Lounsberry). Police “testified at the coroner's inquest that they used a wide range of force to restrain Gammage, who they said surprised them with unprovoked aggressiveness. (Lounsberry). One interesting thing I found in this case was one of the “Officer Vojtas's lawyers noted that Mr. Gammage had emerged from the Jaguar holding a cellular phone, and said the officers had
1. Did officer Smith have reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop of this vehicle?
The Case of Bob and Sue is a complicated one, in the first situation they are in a furniture store. In the furniture store, Bob and Sue were looking to purchase a living room set and they found one, but they needed some time to check their finance before they make any decision. However, the salesperson from the furniture store assures them that they will hold the living room set for 10 days at $2500. He wrote down the name of the unit, price and for how long it will be held.
I am unsure if you received my earlier two emails informing you of my interest in terminating our relationship. I have received no reply. This letter assures you are the one reading this (as opposed to uninvolved staff members whose opinion on the situation is of little merit based on the limited details I provided). Someone read those emails, but there is no way for me to assure who or that the your were even notified. .