A Brief Note On Compensation For Displaced People

Land development is dependent on land acquisition to initiate the development process and the project. Without the appropriate land, communities

If the bank of finance company owned the land, these powerful monster had the rich man's hands tied. The land was greeting poorer, the cotton was robbing the land of futility. “You’ll have to get off the land” said the owners to the tenants. The squatters try to bargain, offering to rotate crops or to take a smaller share, but the bank men are not interested. The land does

In Squatter settlements, the decline in living conditions is accompanied by rapid deterioration of existing housing and homelessness (UN-HABITAT, 2006). The urban poor living in these settlements are especially vulnerable to economic shocks; they lack access to services, safety nets and political representation. While the people are usually poorly educated, competition in the city is high, and it is hard to find jobs. Pressures can also come from environmental hazards such as floods and fire these pressures impact upon the well-being of the poor in these Squatter

Besides, another point have a place is If the administration takes your property for open utilize, they should remunerate you for it. In England or US property could be seized by the government without compensation to build a road or a bridge. The goal here is to ensure no one has their property taken by the government without being properly compensated, by using this law public ask for compensation. As the country's population continued to grow, however, local governments began to place increasing controls on the use of land. Where landowners believed that these restrictions impeded their use of the property, or damaged its value, they began to argue that these restrictions also constituted a taking of their land requiring adequate

The Just Compensation Clause is under the Fifth Amendment in the constitution. There is much controversy that surrounds the Compensation Clause because even though the property owner is being compensated for their land, they are still losing their land without any say in the matter. The constitution states “nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation,” proving that the government can take what they want as long as they pay the amount of money that they think is right.

Now in the twenty-first century, land grab continues the historic process of land enclosures. Enclosure by land grabbing is driven by a combination of the food/energy/climate crisis and the financial crisis (McMichael, 2012). With the increase price of food and energy, land has

One of the rules that could come into play here is the Takings Clause included in the Fifth Amendment. The Takings Clause allows the government to take private property for public purposes through eminent domain or condemnation proceedings. This clause does specify that there must be an appropriate amount of compensation

Capitation and fee-for-service has been an important part of managed health care for reimbursement for several years. The background history of capitation involves determining the patients’ eligibility, the density of geographic areas of PCP’s and payment amounts from sub-specialists. On the other hand, fee-for-service involves high costs, and more manipulation occurs with the fee-for-service (FFS). There are tangible reasons behind both payment services and the disadvantages surrounding them. Various authors offer insight and valuable opinions of the pros and cons of fee-for-service and capitation that need to be addressed.

The TRC report recommended that some of these facilities such as monuments would also generate income for the victims, thus compensating them financially. In the past, people viewed monetary compensations as a quick way to enrichment (Naidu, 2004). Evidence shows that the victims did not get out of poverty after receiving money. However, financial compensation is an essential step towards creating remedies for the oppressed (Hattery, Embrick, & Smith, 2008). Therefore, governments need to strike a balance between material compensation and long-term solutions. Through income-generating activities, communities can

When enacting policies toward asylum seekers and refugees, countries always examine the impact of the economic burden that an influx of vulnerable people is going to have on the country. Accepting refuges requires to government of the asylum country to provide access to housing, welfare, healthcare and education to the new immigrants. Access to career services is also required in order for the new immigrants to receive training and certification needed for them to get employed. However, all these services cause an economic strain in the lives of citizens of asylum countries that is reflected in their taxes. In order to minimize the burden, many countries enact laws that decrease the access to social rights and educational institutions.

Rwanda is home to more than 11.78 million people dispersed around the country in Eastern Africa. Rwanda is also a landlocked country of 26,338 square kilometers and about 1,670 square kilometers are covered by water. The majority of the population is living under poor circumstances and is also suffering from hunger. These are also some of the reasons why Rwanda is not able to take in refugees, and the most recent- Syrian refugees. Another reason is due to the countries’ IDP problem. IDP’s or internally displaced people, are people who are forced to flee their homes but must remain within their countries’

Asking a refugee to pay an entry fee is continuing to persecute them. These people are trying to seek refuge from persecution not basketball player or good that can be traded. Must people seeking refuge would not have $50,000 to pay. It’s a form of discrimination and treating people as if they are goods. I agree that this approach is callous and that is fails to differentiate the willingness and ability to pay. I’m sure if every refugee had the money they would leave their country of persecution by the thousands. I don’t know the immigration laws that govern other counties or if they allow people to pay for entry but for the US to do it, it is very distasteful. One thing that the U.S. government does not take into account, when making these

We think sometimes that poverty is only being hungry, naked and homeless. The poverty of being unwanted, unloved and uncared for is the greatest poverty. We must start in our own homes to remedy this kind of poverty” (Brainy Quote, 1997). In the past homelessness was known as a result of any war. Nowadays, the percentage of homeless people is around 60% worldwide. Also, the concept of homelessness is an expression that covers a huge number of countries which means it shifts from nation to nation. Individuals who are needy are regularly unfit to earn and keep up a standard, protected secure and sufficient stay. Being caused mainly by the individual’s conditions, homelessness can affect people’s health and personal life.

The government's move to acquire fertile agriculture lands for industry has agitated the farmers who are dependent on the lands for livelihood. Ever since the notification regarding the acquisition was published by the state revenue department on December 4 2008, the farmers to be affected have been holding meetings in Haripura, Charal, Bol and Siyawada villages and have decided to launch an agitation against the acquisition of their lands. However Government declared that it was not taking for free and the price of the land at Rs 1,200 per square

Indeed, the coercion of capital to exploit natural resources is possible only because it is supported by the conglomeration of powerful social actors behind it. According to Growth Machine Theories, syndication of vested interests (government, land owners, developers, real estate companies), which often claim themselves as “pro-growth” coalition, encourages local development through real estate business activities, while excluding the interest local population who previously occupy the sites for years (Rudel et al., 2011). Huge commercial farming scheme for the sake of development in rural areas is other typical of the oppression from outside of the local community which tries to stick the capital into certain local areas (). Since local community usually has no systematic organization to balance