A Brief Note On Paint Thinner Or Population Thinner?

According to, http://www.toxicology.org/gp/fda.asp, the Society of Toxicology website, in 1937 the Massengill pharmaceutical company dispersed Elixir Sulfanilamide. This drug was prescribed generally to anyone who had symptoms of strep throat. Elixir Sulfanilamide contains diethylene glycol, which is a chemical equivalent of antifreeze. There were 107 documented deaths, involving many children, because of the lack in regulations. The Pure Food and Drug Act was deemed to insufficient to protect the public. This tragedy was the critical motivation for the creation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

As with many industries, the government is reaching out and imposing restrictions on the all-purpose cleaner industry. The U.S. government has become more stringent on labeling standards, especially when it comes

The Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) is a federal statute that was enacted in 1976. Under the TSCA, chemicals must meet regulations set by the administering body, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Toxic Substance Control Act also requires testing of new chemicals to determine how they affect both the environment and humans. If the chemicals do not meet the regulations, the EPA is allowed to limit or prohibit their manufacturing and sales (Cheeseman, Page 523). While the Toxic Substance Control Act has been around since 1976, it has been amended or expanded 29 times in the last three years alone (EPA.gov). Violating this federal statute can result in hefty fines, and in serious cases, jail time. Like many federal statutes, the Toxic Substance Control Act has some opposition, especially as more changes continue to be made, but overall it has been well-received as a vital protection law that is generally well-enforced.

The first Pure Food and Drug Act was put into action by Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. The act was passed to prevent the manufacture, sale, or transportation of misbranded or harmful food, drugs, medicines, and liquors. Due to this act the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) came to be. The FDA is now responsible for the testing of all foods and drugs for human consumption and the label warnings on them as well.

Use of ‘scary’ chemical names and misappropriated information about said chemical is used for harrowing effect. Propylene glycol is one chemical remarked to be a common food additive that could also be used to winterize your car. As this is not a false statement, it is similar in effect to saying that water is in antifreeze. MSG was stated as another chemical used in this manner that was extremely harmful (viewer was implored at one point to search for ‘MSG Obesity induced mice’). Aspartame and other artificial sweeteners were also vilified, with claims such as Aspartame causing formaldehyde buildup in the brain.

Barkan, Ilyse D. Industry invites regulation: the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. American Journal of Public Health January 1985: Vol. 75, No. 1, pp.

Had manufacturers acted in a responsible manner, VC never would have been introduced as a propellant into consumer products such as hair sprays, pesticides, and paints.” Although this ingredient was replaced by methylene chloride, and is an ingredient in Sebastian Shaper Hairspray Styling Mist for Hold and Control, methylene chloride has been discovered to have similar carcinogenic effects. Methylene Chloride affects the human organs, specifically the heart and blood vessels, the liver and the nervous system. Another harmful ingredient in this hairspray is Benzophenone-3. According to Skin Deep this ingredient has the following concerns: “Developmental/reproductive toxicity, endocrine disruption, Allergies/immunotoxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation, Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive), Enhanced skin absorption, Biochemical or cellular level changes.” Further, the European Commission conducted studies on endocrine disruption and found that this man-made chemical creates a hormonal disruption in humans and animals.

 The past twenty years increasing concerns over the side effects from flame retardant chemicals (FRC) have been brought to the attention of the public stimulating research and laboratory testing for potential dangers previously not associated with flame retardant chemicals. The current proposal LD182 follows other Maine laws establishing bans on specific flame retardants which include: LD 1568 which prevents the

On June 30, 1906, President Theodore Roosevelt signed the Pure Food and Drug Act. He began to enforce this act by also passing the Meat Inspection Act of 1906. The person responsible for introducing the act is Sen. Weldon Heyburn. The act is sure to benefit the health of Americans in the present and future.

On June 22 2016 president Obama a new bill placing stronger regulations on everyday common chemicals like detergents, paint thinners and cleaners. This new law was passed by congress and the head of chemical safety and former us senator Frank R. Lautenberg along with a very rare and uncommon bipartisan vote. The 21st century act will be updating the former toxic substance control act which was instated during the Gerald Ford administration back in the mid 1970s, under this new law the Environmental protection Agency (EPA) Is given a much larger oversight and stronger tools to further monitor those chemicals which may cause cancer and any other possible health complications in both children and adults.

When my now six-year-old son was three, he was very hyperactive. He could not sit still and was always very emotional. Often, it would take a lot of effort to get him to do anything he was told. There were several times where he needed to be physically restrained in order to get him to calm down. After a few episodes at his preschool, one of the administrators suggested that we monitor his diet and remove synthetic food dyes from it. After 3 days of him not having any food with any synthetic dyes in it, he was a different child. He was calm, easy to handle, and his teachers said he was a real pleasure to have in school. After several months of him not having any synthetic food dyes,

In May of 1976, new regulatory policies emerged in the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to ensure the safety of medical devices, known as the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). The act regulated labeling and branding, with an eye toward protecting consumers from misleading claims. In addition, the Medical Device Amendments (MDA) set further protections by requiring that companies seek “pre-market approval” for new devices from the FDA [9]. Re-categorized, tampons and sanitary napkins were now no longer cosmetics but medical devices, just like toothbrushes and pacemakers. The Rely tampon, however, was first test-marketed in Fort Wayne, Indiana, in 1974, predating the new 1976 FDA regulations that spared it from testing

Yet, some companies began to address the issue of lead poisoning as early as the 19th century and even attempted to use it as marketing schemes to sell products. One example of this can be seen a paint add from 1897 (Figure 1). The image depicts a paint made by New Cross London called Aspinall’s Enamel which advertises that the paint, “IS NOT made with lead and is non poisonous” However, despite the companies and even the public knowing about the hazardous effects of lead on the body, it still continued to be used for another eighty years in the US and is still used today throughout the

Formaldehyde is a known to be a human carcinogen. (Ntp.nies.nih.gov..,2016). This agent is used as a preservative and is a cancer causing agent. Product labels do not state if formaldehyde is present, even though the manufacturers use this to prevent mold and bacteria from growing and spoiling the products. The FDA does not restrict the amount of formaldehyde that can be present in cosmetics sold in the U.S. (Facts. G...Concern, C.. & Preservatives. F., 2016). According to the Food and Drug Administrations (FDA), 1 in 5 cosmetic products contain formaldehyde. A caution proclamation on products may be listed when some unsafe ingredients may be existent. For example, ingredients may be safe in products such as lotions when washed off your skin, but not safe when left on the skin for hours. Another example is ingredients that are safe for use on the hair or nails may be unsafe when used on skin or near the

The cosmetology industry has been infamously known for their lack of regulations on companies that produce beauty products. The companies do not operate through the FDA, so they are able to exclude important information from labels. In the past, manufacturers could omit ingredients from labels, claiming the right to protect trade secrets (Nguyen 2). More than 9,000 chemicals are found in cosmetic products; however, only half of them can be found on the labels (Pak 2). Because of the label loopholes, the chemicals in the products have also become unregulated. According to Nguyen at Organic Consumers Association, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not saftey test ingredients used in cosmetic or personal care products before they are sold to the public (2). This leads to toxic chemicals being circulated in the public market. Additionally, if there is not a way to