A Brief Note On Reverse Racism And Affirmative Action

The fact that, in most cases, a minority student will get accepted over a white student with the same or almost the same qualifications is causing controversy all over the nation. This is precisely the definition of affirmative action. In an excerpt titled Affirmative Action and the College Admissions Process from the book, 8 Steps to Help Black Families Pay For College, by Thomas and Will LaVeist, it is stated that, “affirmative action is meant to level the playing field and ensure that schools and businesses are not intentionally discriminating against minority groups.” This leveling of the playing field leads to the very broad generalization and misperception that the policy is allowing less-qualified minorities to take the place of the more-qualified whites.

Racism has been an ongoing problem for decades, but now it has evolved into more complications rather than black people versus white people and wanting equality.

As affirmative action has become a simplistic strategy to decrease racial bigotry, it has developed into undermining the minority while producing favoritism. Additionally, the flawed policy has created preference within career fields and an academic mismatch among races. To eliminate this outdated system, financial-based affirmative action would serve as a revolutionary law that would help those suffering in poverty without highlighting the color of an individual 's skin.

In the 1960s when minorities and whites were equal according to the constitution but unequal in reality, a program was needed to level the playing field. Thus the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was created and prohibited discrimination. It marked the beginning of a debate that has been going on for nearly a half of a century. Affirmative action needs to be reevaluated in educational settings in light of current needs.

Affirmative Action which is also known as equal opportunity is the federal government’s program to counteract discrimination. The intent was to foster diversity, and compensate groups that have historically been discriminated against such as minorities, women, and other underrepresented groups. Although Affirmative Action was intended to right wrong, it has become one of the most controversial issues of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. All three branches of our Government have been involved in the evolution of Affirmative Action.

Affirmative action was created in 1961 and enforced into law. Affirmative action is a policy or law that prohibits the use of discrimination or racial bias from employers regarding race, age, sex, or religion. Colleges and Universities in the state of California have believed that affirmative action is a great plan. Colleges and Universities have been using reverse discrimination to better diverse their campuses. Having such lists were in violation of the 14th amendment. Not getting accepted into college all based on your race is an unfair method. Affirmative action being imposed by the Supreme Court that private universities such as the University of California would only a quota of a certain particular race disregarding previous relatives that have attended that university. Affirmative is mainly the subject of reverse discrimination, universities and colleges need to take account of students academic performances and not accept only those of a certain particular race.

In an Executive Order in 1961, President Kennedy used the term “affirmative action” for the first time in American history. This meant, for the first time, government contractors should take “affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed color, or national origin.”

Some may that Affirmative Action is reverse racism, but I believed it is plays a critical role in achieving equality in the work place. The easiest part to this topic is the definition of Affirmative Action, which is a government or private program intended to compensate past injustices against specific groups by making special efforts to provide members of these groups with access to educational and employment opportunities. Many people have a problem with affirmation action because of the way they view equal opportunity. they are so believed that such opportunity exists.

While Affirmative Action policies in existence have aimed to combat discrimination, they have not contributed fully to establishing fairness and equality in their implementation. These legislations execute reverse discrimination in an attempt to undo the evils of oppression in the past, while using racial preferences as a means to award recipients over academic achievement.

Affirmative action, what is it? If you’ve listened to the news recently it’s been a hot topic. But does everyone fully understand what it is? Affirmative action refers to the favoring of minorities in certain areas, in this case college admissions. Most schools require an applying student to fill out their race on their application. No big deal right? It’s what they do with that information that causes the real issue. The admissions office at a school looks over these applications and determines which are accepted or rejected. However, if you’re a student at the lower end for test scores or GPA and are a minority, you have a much greater chance of getting accepted than a caucasian person in the same situation. If we continue to enforce affirmative action within the admissions process of colleges and universities, then the success rates of students will continue to decrease.

In education, all affirmative action programs truly do is give the opportunity of higher education to those who would ordinarily not have the chance, but they do not crack open the books, do the work, or pass the tests. The real work is done by the students who are given the chance to grow and learn within the walls of some of the most prestigious universities in the United States. It is an opportunity some of them may not have had in different circumstances. The term “affirmative action” actually first appeared in the National Labor Relations Act, better known as the Wagner

Affirmative action is a product of the 1960’s Civil Rights Movement and it is intended to provide equal opportunities for those who have been historically discriminated against within our society. Affirmative action policies are those that make an effort to improve opportunities for historically excluded groups within our society. When focusing on higher education, affirmative action is often referring to admission policies that have been put in place to provide equal access to education for groups that have been historically discriminated against, such as minority groups. This topic is greatly debated across college campuses within the United States. Supporters of affirmative action argue that after California Colleges in 1998 had dropped their affirmative action programs, that minority admissions had reportedly fallen. For example UC Berkeley’s admissions fell 61%, and UCLA 36% (Messerli, 2014). Critics of affirmative action argue that the policy is outdated, that we no longer live in a highly racial society, and that this policy is now causing reverse discrimination by favoring one group over another affirmative action is currently an issue not because there is extensive public outcry in support of racial discrimination, this is not to say that racial discrimination does not persist. The controversy of this issue surrounds around the disagreement about how to best fight discrimination in the current day, and whether to even recognize if

Affirmative action policies are a lot more vague and objective than many people realize. Whereas many people think they refer to hiring based on profiling and quotas, it is not that simple. Affirmative action is simply the willingness of an organization to engage in any activities — particularly for staffing and school admissions — that helps to alleviate present racial discrimination within society. This does not mean that any institution is required to hire a certain number of African-American people in a year, as many people think. There is not a mandated number of Native Americans taken into higher education programs. But there is a requirement to at least keep in mind while hiring and admitting

Affirmative action has faced much scrutiny in its 53 year history. There has been plenty of praise, and even disapproval from some for this term created by President John F. Kennedy when he enacted Executive Order 10925. He created it in order to address discrimination that had remained prevalent despite the recent civil rights movements, and the promises, made in the constitution. It was not fully in order until President Lyndon B. Johnson brought it into maturity by signing the Civil Rights Act and requiring its laws be obeyed. Johnson declared, “We seek…not just equality as a right and a theory, but as a fact and as a result” (Brunner and Rowen). One of the primary focuses of this new affirmative action policy was on education. The

Affirmative action has been a controversial matter in education for various reasons. Those who oppose affirmative action, often refer to it as “reverse discrimination.” Whites feel as if affirmative action makes society unjust for whites. They argue that being white will impair you from succeeding in life with affirmative action in place. I find this Ludacris, for centuries minorities have been oppressed and not able to succeed in life. Affirmative action only even’s the playing field to allow the minority group to have a chance at a well off life. In the case The University of Texas vs. Fisher; Abigail Fisher felt as if being white affected her admission process and that minorities took more “worthy” and “qualified” persons’ spots, due to