A Brief Note On The American College Of Nurse Midwives Essay

The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) published the expected standards for pre-registration midwifery education. They stated that Student Midwives are required to assist in the care and support of several women throughout their antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum period. This is achieved via the caseload holding scheme (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2009). Midwifery led continuity of care models are described as care given during the antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal period from a known and trusted midwife in order to empower a woman to have a healthy pregnancy and birth (Sandall, Soltani and Gates, 2016). In September 2005 research was published supporting midwifery-led continuity of care, which they found was linked to a number of benefits for both mothers and babies, in contrast with obstetrically led and shared care (The Royal College of Midwives, 2014).

For hundred of years, women have wrestled with their womanhood, bodies, and what it means to be a woman in our society. Being a woman comes with a wonderful and empowering responsibility--giving birth. What sets us aside from other countries is that the process and expectations of giving birth has changed in our society; coming from midwifery, as it has always been since the early times, to hospitals where it is now expected to give birth at. Midwifery was a common practice in delivering babies in

Home birth versus hospital birth is one of the more controversial topics in the world today. It is a delicate topic because the safety and well-being of mothers and babies is in question. The majority of the information out there is subjective, making it difficult to reach an unbiased conclusion.

This paper is an evaluation of philosophical and sociological underpinnings within Australian maternity services. The information was researched from observational studies of six articles connected to the medicalisation of childbirth that is associated with low risk pregnant women. The objective for this paper is to review key theoretical arguments related to the reference of homebirth and midwifery services and against barriers to home birthing and the underlying discussion of freedom of choice. The interrelations between dominant themes were incorporated. This paper reports on the findings of “Preparing for birth”, “Birth expectation barriers and emasculation of midwifery” and finally the “Trajectory of Australian Health Policies”.

Home births have been done for centuries, however they are uncommon in today’s world. Gone are the days where women had babies on the kitchen tables. So why are women beginning to yet again seek out home births? Most women have reasons such as they want to be in a more comfortable environment, and they want the process to be as natural as possible. Those women are still the vast minority in america, as most women prefer hospital births, due to the proximity to critical care in case of emergencies, painkillers, and simply because that it the way things are done here.

There are many factors that are thought of and questioned when deciphering whether or not to choose a homebirth or a hospital birth. Many individuals choose an option because of personal opinion, religious beliefs, or because of a story and personal experience one has told the individual.

What was found was that the woman who did home births went to more prenatal visits and had a lower chance of having a cesarean section (Etches, Farquharson, Janssen, Lee, Peacock, and Ryan, 2002). Surprisingly the rate that ended up going to the hospital during the home birth or after was about 22%, but with the home births there was less use of episiotomy, electronic fetal monitoring, and etc. Researchers found that the Apgar scores that were completed by each group did not change from any of the groups along with the neonates first amount of feces did not change from the groups at all. There was no breech devlieries of babies during the home births. All in all there was no difference in risk between the new mothers or the new born with having a planned baby born at home with a midwife compared to having a planned baby at a hospital with or without a

This book is very informative and serves many purposes. First, it demonstrates one of life’s miracles – the childbirth process. Second, this book provides evidence and research findings that shape nursing care practices to promote a greater well-being in both the mother and newborn. Third, this book serves as a resource for healthcare

Quality of care for maternal and newborn health has been an agenda that has been neglected. Many women experience disrespectful, abusive, or neglectful treatment during child birth in facilities.Woman autonomy are being violated, leaving women without the choice to seek the proper maternal health care services. Quality care for women and newborns morality has been seeking less attention.issues with quality of care must improve deaths of mothers and newborns has became a issue. Stitches proves that more than a half a million women died during a pregnancy. Statistics also proves that 80% percent of deaths can have been prevented.we need to prioritize the framework of quality care and also

When it comes to deciding on where to have a child, there seem to be two definitive choices. Either have the child in a professional setting such as a hospital, or opt for a smaller setting by having a home birth. Both of these options have their ups and downs that could make an individual choose one as being the best in their own eyes. This ethnographic research report uses both peer reviewed journals written by medical professionals and research obtained from interviewing participants of varying age and gender to find which of the two options is truly the optimal one. After doing the internet research, it seemed as though most lean towards the hospital setting as they referenced lower mortality rates as their strong point. On the other hand, those in favor of home birth clung to the idea that the intimacy of the setting is the most crucial part of the process of birthing the child. Although there were arguments in favor of home birth, the overwhelming majority of sources emphasized the choice of the hospital setting. This ratio was also represented by the interviews as most of the participants believed that they would rather have their child be born in a hospital. They came to this conclusion on their own, even after being informed of the benefits and downsides to each of the settings.

The topic of Home Birth is one that is constantly being debated, researched and talked about. Here I will discuss several aspects of this topic to be thought over for what they are: facts. A home birth is simply giving birth to a child at home rather than in a hospital. There are many benefits when choosing home birth as well as negative consequences. When having a child, many aspects must be acknowledged and well thought over. These include the cost, the location, whether a midwife is necessary or not among other concerns. A midwife is “a person trained to assist women in childbirth.” (Dictionary.com). This knowledge is important in understanding the differences between hospital and home birth as midwives may be present in either situation.

A majority of these women in the study were younger than 35 years of age of Dutch origin, had previous pregnancies, and had a lower socioeconomic status (Jonge et al., 2015). The purpose of the study was to determine the rates severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) which included uterine rupture, eclampsia, hemorrhage, maternal death and other severe outcomes (Jonge et al., 2015). Researchers concluded that patients that started with midwife care at the onset of labor will have decreased severe maternal outcomes than starting with obstetrical-led care (Jonge et al., 2015). Other resources confirm that women who received midwife-led care had less epidurals, episiotomy’s, and lacerations (Sandal et al., 2013). A majority of these women went without induction which resulted in fewer preterm labors (Sandal et al., 2013). Although a contrasting recent study in New Zealand demonstrated a greater decrease in severe fetal outcomes including stillbirth, birth related asphyxia, neonatal encephalopathy, and low APGAR scores during obstetrician-led care rather than midwifery-led care (Wernaham et al., 2016). Research done at a Freestanding Birth Center using the midwife-led care model depicted that fewer preterm births took place but no significant difference when compared to APGAR scoring and low birthweights (Benatar, Garrett,

The main reason, I found, for hospital births was the idea of 'safety'. This was evident from my questonnaire as 83% of my respondents said they would prefer a hospital birth due to the medical help on hand. Women feel safer in hospitals because of the equipment and different doctors available to help if needed. Women don't have this option at home or in a midwifery-led unit. Also, if a woman was to have a home birth she would not be allowed to have an epidural as an anaesthetists needs to administrate it; this puts some women off. This was my main finding of the reasons for a hospital birth however I found muliple reasons for a home birth. Home births offer comfort and a relaxing environment. The woman has control over her birth and has the choice of who stays by her side during labour. In your own home there is the option of privacy and control over visitors, also you aren't surrounded by sick people. The reasons for a home birth seem to be more appealing than the reasons for a hospital birth and it is suprising that not more women opt for a home birth. Overall, this information supports my hypothesis of home births being the better option for low risk

A woman in birth is at once her most powerful, and her most vulnerable. Women who have given birth through unhindered practises come to the realization that she was much stronger than they initially thought. Home birth is a common occurrence for women in some countries, such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. However, in Australia, home births are rare and actively discouraged by many medical professionals, including the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Although Australian home births have increased by over 300% from 1994 (with 44 home births) to 144 in 2012, still less than 1% of Australian women give birth at home. Though most women undertake appropriate precautions, the actions of few

To begin with, homebirths can be a rewarding experience for mothers, with significant health benefits when compared to hospital births. This includes fewer lacerations, hemorrhages, and infections. But, contrary to the above information home births are more dangerous for the baby once it reaches the neonatal stage. Babies are referred to as neonates in the first 28 days of that baby’s life. New statistics from the Center for Disease Control states that babies who are born at home are two times more likely to die as a neonate. Although, hospital births may have more cases of infection they also prove to be better at post birth checkups to ensure that the babies are healthy. Hospitals go through more thorough testing