A Brief Note On The Chesapeake Bay Game

In the early America colonies, each colony was largely settled by people of English origin. Although the majority of the colony founders were generally from similar areas, the colonies were all different. Two regions like this were the New England region and the Chesapeake region. New England consisted of the states Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. Chesapeake consisted of Virginia and Maryland. Although the regions were very close to each other on a map, by the 1700’s both regions had evolved into two very distinct societies. This was due to the colonists reasons fro coming to the New World, their belief systems, the colonists themselves, and the geography.

While both the people of the New England region and of the Chesapeake region descended from the same English origin, by 1700 both regions had traveled in two diverse directions. Since both of these groups were beset with issues that were unique to their regions and due to their exposure to different circumstances, each was forced to rethink and reconstruct their societies. As a result, the differences in the motivation, geography, and government in the New England and Chesapeake regions caused great divergence in the development of each.

Today, the United States of America is a very racially and religiously diverse society. We saw the seeds of diversity being sown in the early days of colonization when the Chesapeake and New England colonies grew into distinctive societies. Even though both regions were primarily English, they had similarities as well as striking differences. The differentiating characteristics among the Chesapeake and New England colonies developed due to geography, religion, and motives for colonial expansion.

The immigrants that settled the colonies of Chesapeake Bay and New England came to the New World for two different reasons. These differences were noticeable in social structure, economic outlook, and religious background. As the colonies were organized the differences were becoming more and more obvious and affected the way the communities prospered. These differences are evident from both written documents from the colonists and the historical knowledge of this particular period in time.

On March 3rd, 1813, the first British ships of war appeared on the Chesapeake Bay. For two years the Chesapeake would be the scene of numerous amounts of battles. Some would be lost in anonymity, but others would make history. But first, why did the British come? We were at war almost thirty years before, so how did it come upon these two superpower nations to collide once again? A few answers to these questions will put the war of 1812 and the Battle of the Chesapeake Bay in its proper context.

New and the Chesapeake’s both had significant and similar purpose to escape from Europe and make states that can allow their own freedom. However, in time both regions began to change and in most ways different in many divisions. Many of these changes or differences such as purpose for freedom, the climate and the environment, and political and economic structures through the changes. Each of these changed the regions own perspective and back ground thus making these regions very different in was unimaginable.

The different people who started settling in New England and the Chesapeake region could have come from the same country. But what they were looking for made a lot of sense which was; economic, religious and also their social differences. Their different societies started to lead on to different economics. Religion for New England was the most important, it was their goal in life, they wanted to be a religious example. There were a lot of social differences, and of course differences in people as well.

Life in the American wilderness was brutal and short for the earliest Chesapeake settlers. Malaria, dysentery, and typhoid cut ten years off the life expectanct of immigrants from England. Half the people born in early Virginia and Maryland did not survive even twelve years, and few lived past their fifties, forties if they were women. The settlements only grew slowly, mostly from immigrants from England, and most of the immigrants were single men in their late teens and early twenties. There were barely any women and so they were fought for; eligible women did not remain single for long. Moreover, families were few as most men could not find wives and marriages were destroyed by deaths. Yet the Chesapeake colonies struggled on, becoming more

Throughout the early 1600s and late 1700s, many left their home countries in Europe to colonize the New World. Most notably were English pilgrims who sailed the Atlantic in large numbers and settled two major regions along the Eastern coast of North America. These regions soon became known as New England and the Chesapeake Bay areas. Though both were established predominantly by the English, both regions had their own and unique identities. These identities were established through regional economic motives, population differences and religious intensities.

Chesapeake Bay and New England DBQ The settlers of English origin began to migrate from England to North America in the 1600s. The foreigners came to the new world in search of wealth, religious freedom, and a fresh start on life. People of all types of backgrounds came to settle in the Americas. The settlers had two regions one could choose to go to; New England and the Chesapeake Bay.

In the modern day, every single place is different. There are different ideas, different cultures, different people. The bustling metropolis of New York City is worlds away from a sleepy little town in west Missouri. Each place has its own identity that was slowly developed from colonial times. Most colonies on the east coast were settled largely by the English.

When migrating there are many factors that attract different groups of people to move into different parts of land. The surplus of land made moving to Georgia or the Carolinas as well as Chesapeake and the middle colonies a desire for most people. No one lived in these really and it was under the radar. Moving there would help people get land and use it before someone else took it.

The divergent societal construction was not built in the same dictum on purpose for the New England and the Chesapeake region. The New England society was governmentally ruled with much more of a religious outlook and had much more of a union with it’s people, acting more as one than many. Obviously, the Chesapeake region had an adjacent society which also had a more economically literal driven society, in which case held many downfalls.

I too am saddened by the damage done to The Chesapeake Bay over the past few years. In addition I find it sad how no one really talks about this problem either. I keep thinking of one particular scene in the documentary where David Fortier (The Waterman) asked a friend, “Where will you be in 20 years with crabbing?” The sad reality is he may not be a Waterman in 20 years, because of factors such as the recent budget cuts from the EPA. I am curious as to what the Chesapeake Bay will look like 20 years from now.

The past and current agricultural practices in Minnesota have led to the degradation of the topsoil and water in the state. This degradation leads to a negative impact on the environmental and economic health of the state. Both the agricultural and recreational economies are effected by the lack of progress in keeping soil, excess nutrients, and chemicals out of the streams, rivers, and lakes. Minnesota has come up with solutions to address the issue from new technics for the industrial farming (cover crops/crop rotation), conservation efforts (wetland restoration/protection), and innovative farming practices (urban farming). Each solution has its advantages and disadvantages that will help in deciding if the solution is an environmentally sustainable and economically feasible decision. Furthermore, opinions on the solutions happening in Minnesota addressing the decline of the soil and water quality in the state due to the agriculture industry can be concluded in the finish of this paper.