Okay, so I'm a bit late, but I don't know how many of you diehard sports fans read this book. You see, it's more about life than it is about football, even though one of the main characters is former Baltimore Colts defensive lineman Joe Ehrmann, now a minister and defensive coordinator for a Baltimore private school, albeit one with what now has become a perennial power in the East. And while the book might fail in its quest to become the next "Tuesdays With Morrie" (its short length and book jacket combine to try to give you that image), it is a book worth reading.
If you're a father, a son looking to connect with a father, a coach of boys, a teacher of boys or a leader of boys, you should read this book. Basically, Ehrmann and the private
…show more content…
In fact, the book is also about Marx, his life's journey, his connection with Ehrmann that dated back to when he was a high school kid going to tennis camp at a different private school where the Colts held their training camp, and his relationship with his father. While Marx does a good job of describing Poggi's and Ehrmann's attempts to build better men, he falls a bit short in developing the parallel them of connecting with his father. In this portion of the book, Marx holds back a bit and doesn't give us much depth of context as to his historical relationship with his father. All he reveals is that his father was hard-working and first told him he loved him when he was in his twenties. There's no description of a "Great Santini" here, no comparison to Ehrmann's father, an absent, itinerant stevedore who worked the Great Lakes and slapped him silly when he was a very young boy, so, in a sense, you have the author giving you a view of his life without revealing much. I don't think that this book would have become a "Tuesdays With Morrie" for men looking to be better men anyway, but had it had a chance to do so, Marx failed it with the incomplete effort regarding his relationship with his father.
That said, I acknowledge that I'm being a bit of a tough critic here. Perhaps the "Tuesdays with Morrie" motif created expectations for this book that were too high. Perhaps I was looking for comparable excellence in the parallel themes that Marx adroitly created. All that said, Marx's book is very much worth reading. Poggi and Ehrmann and men worth listening to and following, and Marx himself gives some helpful hints about trying to heal the void he obviously carried with him about the metaphysical distance between him and his
Howard Schultz stated, “In times of adversity and change, we really discover who we are and what we’re made of “. Adversity is a time when everything seems to be very bad. It is a time where most want to give up because it is too hard for them to go on. Morrie Schwartz and Elie Wiesel are both faced with adversity, but in different ways. In the novel, Tuesdays with Morrie, written by Mitch Albom, Morrie is faced with a disease that is killing him. In the novel, Night, written by Elie Wiesel, Elie, himself, is faced with death and does not really know he is facing death. Both men are facing a huge difficulties, but they both handled it in different ways. Morrie and Elie are both faced with adversity, but they both use faith and other people
The book, Tuesdays With Morrie sets out to discover the thoughts of Morrie Schwartz and answers his views on questions such as: are you satisfied with where you are in life. are you content with your surroundings, the people in your life and even yourself? Do you fear death or are imartacail to that fact of life? While reading an excerpt from this book the reader can ask themselves these questions too, and compare and contrast their answers to how Morrie (a well rounded, educated, college professor) views similar topics in his later life.
Why me? What did I do to deserve this? Cries of despair by self-righteous, egotistical(for that
Have you ever wanted really amazing knowledge and life and its many obstacles? May I suggest a meaningful book to you, read Tuesdays With Morrie. My book was all about an old college professor who is dying of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis better known as ALS. I really did enjoy Tuesdays With Morrie . This book just makes me feel almost like I should think,” I, have one life I might as well live It,” If a book makes you want to do more with your life you know it is a good book. I think that this book has many themes but the biggest one is probably, "Life happens, Just roll with the
Marx focused on the development of human society, focusing on how people live and are organized. Due to the constant changes that happen in society, the people change as well. Marx explains in his reading The Two Sides of Society, how the transition to capitalism is very important. This transition that took place was only for the benefit of the ones on top, to keep their money and profits growing, while exploiting those below
Morrie has taught many valuable lessons throughout the book, Tuesdays With Morrie mitch albom . His most valuable lesson is “Accept what you are able to do and what you are not able to do.” (p. 18). This quote means that you have to learn what your strengths are. If you start to accept what you can do and not focus on what you cannot do then you will get to know and understand your strengths. For example, there are some subjects I’m not good at , but that doesn’t give me any reason to be lazy and not try. The subject I’m not good at, I continue trying harder to receive better results, if I were to focus on what I cannot do then I wouldn't have the motivation to try my best. The quote also means that different people have different qualities
Marx’s primarily aims to explain how communism will free men, end the class struggle. The work argues that class struggles, and the exploitation of one class by another is the source of all inequality. Marx’s theories become one the motivating force behind all historical developments. The work strongly advocates the freedom of the proletariats which Marx’s claims can only be achieved when property and other goods cease to be privately owned. He see’s that private property has been a problem through out history, capital that aids the ruling class to maintain control. Marx argues that the lower class come together in a revolution and gain power and eventually take the power away from the upper class.
by his father never to talk about her. It was a terrible burden to Morrie.
• As they are presented in the introductory essay, do you think Marx’s works are intended to be theoretical interpretations of communism, or was Karl Marx primarily focused on, and an expert in, the workings of capitalism?
Even though Marx lived in poverty for most of his life and was not treated well by many of the governments in the world, he was an important person in history. He contributed to much of the sociological and economic world, and one of those contributions was the creation of Marxism. He spent a lot of time creating Marxism, which proved to be a worldwide view that would
Karl Marx was a German philosopher in 1818 through 1883 and he lived during the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution was the creation of modern society and the creation of machines where Marx gets his new ideas and beliefs. Marx philosophy was about class struggled and how we progress throughout history of a group conflicted with another group. Marx believed that time drags us to a higher level after every conflicted we had in history also known as a transformed society over time of history, system, and existence. Marx myths of Primate Accumulation are that people’s ancestors were lazy and capitalism starts with violence of one class against another.
The text of Marx was hard to read, but it was also really interesting. In its text Marx implied many ideas that he developed later in his other texts, such as the concept of false consciousness or the superstructure and the infrastructure and the relation between the two. The two are so different in their way of working, but at the same time really alike because they both have the same goal. Which come back to the general idea of contradiction and to the dialectic. According with Marx’s ideas even if there are differences between two people or two social classes there is also a similarity they all work to transform things and to survive. Their understanding of surviving may be different and vary according their ownership of the means of production,
Karl Marx, an extremist, with most of his ideas, but intelligent and very intuitive toward our future. Marx believed there were 2 groups of persons, those who were the wealthy, or the bourgeoisie and the proletariat who were the lower class or those who worked for the bourgeoisie. He saw what was happening during the industrial revolution and could deduce a great sketch of society. Those who didn’t hold a job he called, “lumpen proletariat,” in which those were the slums, or as our book calls them parasites (Siegel, 268). Together, they made the society that existed during that time period.
Marx points to class struggle as a main point in his argument. In a faceoff between the haves and the have nots. Those that produce goods and those that do not but own the capital that production is derived from. In this system moving up is almost impossible to do while losing wealth and status is very easy to do. He views the system very one sided where wealth is accumulated and passed from generation to generation and almost impossible to penetrate the upper class because those that work barely survive. The bourgeoisie are forced to continue mass production to fuel mass profits at any cost even at the expense of their own workers. Only caring enough to ensure bare minimal survival. Maintaining status and wealth is at the utmost importance.
In this time, Marx see a new way of life that has a hand in everyone’s life. Marx propose history and the future are on a timeline of stage. In these stages, society has a different economic statis. It start with the tribal way where people share their products. Then, society moves onto the slave. In this society, everything is made on the backs of the slaves and they never get to see any of the income. Next, society when into the feudal system where the peasants who the land in return for a place to live. Finally, society arrived to the time period that Marx was writing his pamphlet from, the capitalist. In this time, the labors worked for the bourgeois to make a product that the bourgeois would benefit from the labor’s work.