A Civil Action Term Paper

A class action waiver is essentially a type of document that prevents someone from using a class action lawsuit. This is common among employment contracts, although it can be used for other types of contracts as well. When someone signs this type of waiver, they are essentially removing their right to file a class action lawsuit.

A Civil Action is about an environmental pollution court case in Woburn, Massachusetts. The case focused on an industrial solvent, trichloroethylene, from a local leather company, which contaminated a local aquifer that eventually had lethal consequences on the inhabitants of the town. After Anne Anderson’s son dies of leukemia, she filed a civil lawsuit along with eight other families against The John J. Riley Tannery by Beatrice Foods and Cryovac Manufacturing W. R. Grace Company because their industrial operations correlated to fatal cases of cancer and leukemia in children as well as other health issues reported among the citizens. Anne implored Jan Schlichtmann, a tenacious personal injury specialist, to take the case. When Schlichtmann

There are few things in life that could be worse than loosing you child to such a horrible disease as leukemia. One can only imagine having such a tragedy repeat itself throughout you community time after time. To compound such tragedies, imagine being poisoned yourself and having to fight some of the largest local corporations to prove the truth and get it stopped. This is the community setting for Jonathan Harr's true-to-life legal thriller A Civil Action. The book was an award winner for "Best Seller" in 1995 and was named the 1995 National Book Critics Circle Award.

I do believe that he acted fairly. It make sense even if it feels unfair to people who know the whole truth. There would be no case if they could not prove that the contaminants had gotten into the water. I am not sure if the way he asked the jury was the most fair way. But in the end it makes sense to me why he did what he did. If the jury did not believe that the water was contaminated by thoses companies then there is no case for the families to fight. It makes sense that the judge did not want to have the family to go on the stand because what would that prove to the jury, if some of them do not believe that the water was contaminated. I can see how he would think that was a waste of time.

The odds of a plaintiff winning in civil court are two to one against. Most people do not even try, they settle. Out of the approximate 780,000 cases filed each year, only 12,000 or 1.5%, ever reach a verdict. These facts are some that are told in the movie A Civil Action. A Civil Action is based on the book by Jonathan Harr and on a true story. This movie, which was filmed in 1998, is about a water contamination case that happened in Massachusetts. The case is known as Anderson v. Cryovac. John Travolta plays the role of the main character Jan Schlichtmann, who is a personal injury attorney. Although typically a water contamination case would not fall into the hands of a personal injury attorney, but in this case, he was just supposed to be handling the case of a woman’s son who died of leukemia. She called him live on a radio talk show and explained that she had called his firm to handle the case, and now they would not return any of her calls. He explains how sorry he was and that he would take care of it as soon as possible.

The state of being subject only to laws established for the good of the community in regards to freedom, or civil liberties, is a state that was challenged for very many years. African Americans dealt with numerous hardships in order to earn something that should not have been questioned, their freedom.

When it comes to a lawsuit which can include civil lawsuits, there is more than one party that is being sued. When a person files for a civil lawsuit the police department, policy makers, and at times the police officer is being sued for any unlawful actions that were against that person or person’s property. This can cause a problem for the department and all parties that are involved with the training of the police officer. As a police officer, you can be sued when in uniform or when you are in civilian clothes depending on the words that the person says. This will be discussed further into the paper. What can be concluded from the lawsuit is, was the police officer properly trained?

On this session, my classmates and I submitted our social project. It is so empowering to see how different people think of different ways to help enrich our society with positive attitudes. I am so honored to say that this class changed my heart and mind in so many levels. For example, donating blood is such a unique way to support human lives and somehow society takes this for granted. What I learned from this project also is that one does not need a lot of time to invest in helping our city to improve. We were also required to watch and discussed a movie called “A Civil Action” where ethics play an important role during the whole film. In the end, EPA found abnormalities during the lawsuit, and found guilty of multiple charges to Grace

It has been discovered that Dr. Jane Madison, a philosophy teacher of fourteen years at Appalachian Valley College, is currently in violation of the organization’s religious and social policies. The college is a fully-accredited private Baptist college that presents education with a uniquely Christian world view. However, Dr. Madison has recently announced that she is gay and has been teaching in the classroom that her lifestyle should be legalized nationwide and should be considered religiously and socially acceptable. As an HR manager, I have concerns regarding the wrongful decisions being made by Dr. Madison. There are legalities in place that requires all faculty members, including Dr. Madison, to present and subscribe

Danle should disclose the class-action litigation. The case states “Danle’s external counsel relating to the two lawsuits that led counsel to believe that Danle could potentially, but not probably, but liable for a percentage of recovery sought by the claimants in those matters”. If it is reasonably possible then Danle would be required to disclose according to the AICPA standards. The only possible way to avoid disclosing the litigation is if and only if it was a remote chance that they would have the judge rule against them, otherwise it needs to be disclosed. Also while Danle doesn’t have an exact percentage of the amount they could pay out, they do have a maximum amount that can potentially be paid out at 50% of the original judgement.

Although I am optimistic about the future of urban school districts, experience (and my mother) taught me the value of taking matters into your own hands. During my doctorate studies, I am also interested in continuing my in-class action research to see if and how self-empowerment and resiliency can be taught in a classroom or school-based program setting. Through providing spaces where girls’ voices can be heard and are validated, can school environments then teach girls how to self-advocate to make sure their rights (in and outside of school) are being upheld? The qualitative and quantitative data I collected from female students last year showed that they were not being suspended at a disproportionate rate but that they were also being suspended

This passage reminded me about this book I read, ‘’ Civil Action,’’ the book was resolves around the illegal dumping of the industrial chemical solvent, trichloroethylene, and how it contaminated the city’s drinking water causing Leukemia, cancer and other health issues among the people of Woburn. For instance, there were 12 deaths (8 of them children). However, a law suit was brought to this company since a young boy died of Leukemia. The government need to be held accountable for these damage since they are the one who are making the rules. I believe that the health of citizens should always come first no matter what. I wonder when other companies are going to spend forward admitting to what they are doing to our environment? When will

A Civil Action is a great film for what it does and what it stands for, which in this case is the true story behind a class action lawsuit against two corporations in the small town of Woburn, Massachusetts. The reason for the lawsuit against W.R. Grace and J. Riley’s Corporations is that spilled a chemical used to waterproof leather onto the river connected to the wells. With the water now unsafe to drink twelve kids got leukemia, and eight of those twelve died. Jan Schlichtmann, representing the plaintiffs, who is in charge of this whole mess did it for the money like he had always done his whole life.”Do you think I did it for the money”(Zaillian)1. But for the families of those now dead, it's more about getting the wells cleaned up rather

In the movie, A Civil Action revolves around a case about water contamination in Woburn, Massachusetts. A group of parents whose children developed leukemia teamed up together and found a lawyer, Joe Mulligan, to make a case against anyone responsible for the contamination of the local wells. Schlichtmann and his team argued that the Beatrice Foods and the W.R Grace Company were responsible for the poisoning of the wells. Schlichtmann’s firm also collected medical records from family records, he then landed in debt due to all his spendings in the investigation. Beatrice Food’s plaintiffs case is much more stronger for two reasons; they have evidence from seeing a person littering the water and the wells were always contaminated. The final

A Civil action is movie based on a true story of court case about environmental pollution that took place in Wilburn, Massachusetts, in the 1980's. The court case revolves around the issue of trichloroethylene, an industrial solvent and its contamination of a local source. Jan Schlichtmann An American Attorney specializing in personal injury Law filed a lawsuit over industrial operation that "cased several children to die from leukemia and cancer, as well as a wide variety of other health problems, among the citizens of the Town."1 Jan originally rejects a seemingly unprofitable case, Jan finds an environmental issue involving groundwater contamination that could be a good case against "some defendants with deep pockets."2 The local tanneries