A Closer Look at Pluralism

In the United States, pluralism is pertinent and very significant for the government because the government itself is distributed with various powers given to the states. These states then give powers to their local governments, which continues to distribute the power. In the government system, there are levels of that consist of branches that control the many different parts of the system, so that no one person or group is given too much power. The United States has a system of checks and balances, which is pertinent to the power system and the pluralist theory ("What is a pluralist theory of government?" 2017).

In “Problems and Promise in Pluralism,” Annalee R. Ward argues for academic freedom through the lens of confessional pluralism. Ward challenges the academy to revisit pluralism to ascertain whether various denominations can have an “engagement of differences in creative ways” that allow for coexistence in scholarship” (Eck 9). Although academy insists that pluralism tugs on personal integrity, closer examination show that “authentic peaceful coexistence” is a possible outcome when approached correctly (Ward 5).

America was widely known as a “melting pot” of sorts for many generations. The country earned its title by accepting immigrants of various cultures and molding, or melting, them into the American lifestyle. However, the “melting pot” idea of America is starting to dissipate. According to a Newsweek Poll on the public, “only 20 percent still think America is a melting pot” (Morganthau and Wolfberg, par.4). As more Americans push away immigrants and create stereotypes against said immigrants, America continues to lose its title as a “melting pot.” There is ethnic friction in America and people have begun to have a hard time assimilating (Morganthau and Wolfberg, par.18). .America is beginning to place a negative outlook on its

In politics, racial and ethnic backgrounds tend to outline the outcomes of public policies- especially in minority communities. Minorities in the United States yearly increase due to both legal and illegal immigration (Shaw et al. 332). The trend will continue and by the middle of the 21st century, the minority population, cumulatively, will surpass the so-called White majority in the United States. The definitions of pluralism and two-tiered pluralism differ between the person’s race and ethnic backgrounds. As for the minorities, it may both bring some advantages and as well as disadvantages in public participation and the passing of public policies; however, in current times, two-tiered pluralism is becoming more dominant in politics as the racial divide within the United States continues to worsen.

Within the United States, a variety of cultures exist. These cultures may not always get along, but it is this melting pot that makes America unique. Two stories, “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen, and “The Immigrant Contribution” by John F Kennedy, provide differing viewpoints on how cultures contributed to make America the Nation that it is. When comparing the two stories, there were some obvious differences when looking at how cultures were perceived. In the story, “A Quilt of a Country” on page 14, the author writes about how different cultures in the United States don’t always get along.

Buddhism from India, Christianity from the Roman Empire, Hinduism from India, Islam from Saudi Arabia, Sikhism from India, Judaism from Israel . Should they all gave the rights and freedom to practice what and how they want even if they are not in their country? According to the First Amendment in the U.S constitution its states freedom of religion which is the right to practice whatever religion one chooses. Sadly, episodes of vandalism, fire related crime, and even physical viciousness have likewise once in a while been coordinated against these new religious focuses and the groups that call them home. In the article “From Diversity to Pluralism” Eck define pluralism as “the engagement that creates a common society from all that diversity”.

A country in the build that opens its arms to immigrants and refuges in the world but still aims to become a ‘nation’ must naturally adopt a strategy; America adopted that of ‘assimilation’. In the context of

Without socialization, humans would not possess the knowledge of language nor thought. James Baldwin stated in an article of the Saturday Review in 1963 that he believed “man is a social animal. He cannot exist without society.” Although man is highly dependent on and requires the presence of society for survival, society would not exist without members. While there are disadvantages to social settings, there are a large number of benefits to them as well. Numerous advantages include a higher sense of independence and individuality, a feeling of security, and an increased level of understanding and comprehension for mankind. This knowledge helps us recognize the reality of our present. We can gain insight to what humans have done in the past through studying our history. Regarding this information, we can grow and develop as a society through past behaviors by enhancing healthier lifestyles, preventing the disturbance of our environment, in addition to limiting the high number of extinctions, and more.

As a 100% Hispanic that I considered myself I agree with both terms up to certain extend, The love and respect that I have for my culture, my beliefs, my costume, my language, music, food and the way I been raised never going to change, which is something that every single one of you will agree with me. That’s my example of pluralism because no one is going to make me change my roots.

Example: the good example that we can take for this pattern is United States, the system of integration is prepared to tolerate greater culture and social diversity. In this kind of integrated states. One ethnic group can’t dominate others, also ethnic-sharing is not possible.

Pluralism is having more than one group or culture coexist in the same place. According to Mouw pluralism is just something we cope with in this world. He also said that pluralism is many-ism, because there are many different groups in this world.

I enjoyed reading your post. I agree with you when you said that pluralism is more of a norm in society today than universalism. Pluralism is according to Merriam-webster.com (2015), “a situation in which people of different social classes, religions, races, etc., are together in a society, but continue to have their different traditions and interests; the belief that people of different social classes, religions, races, etc., should live together in a society”. In today’s society, there are a plethora of religions celebrated.

Traditionally, moral philosophers have recognized as their aim that of seeking a fundamental moral principle, through which one could assess any moral choice one may face.

Pluralism and diversity, often used interchangeably, are among those buzzwords that some of us instantly recognize. Indeed, the world we live in today is shaped by a plurality of pluralisms, including but not limited to religious pluralism, cultural pluralism, ethnic diversity, and multiple group identities.

In 2008, the government created a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, hereafter referred to as TRC, committed to the tasks of discovering the truth about Canada’s Indian Residential Schools, revealing this truth to all Canadians, and attempting to reconcile the relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians. One of the ways the TRC suggested to facilitate this reconciliation process is through the creative arts. Indeed, in the last few years, Canada has seen a host of artistic projects launched which seek to heal and reconcile this relationship, these projects will hereafter be referred to as ‘reconciliation art’. One of the most prominent