A Cold War

____ 25. What is the process for a federal judge to be removed from office?

Manifesto sees the decision of the supreme court as “clear abuse of judicial power” (1).

These extreme cases of judicial misconduct are rare; but when they happen they force us to think critically about our judicial system and the important role it plays in our society. When it comes to preventing abuses

1. Does the court have the right to issue a Writ of Mandamus to order the new presidency to deliver the remaining commissions?

Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceedings.

Article III - The Judicial power works within the supreme court. Congress can change and establish judges. Both supreme and inferior courts have to behave in a certain manner.

The question of whether a certain law is to be authorised by s51(vi) is a question that must be determined by the courts. The separation of powers as set out in the Constitution means that neither the legislature nor the executive can pre-empt the judicial function by purporting to determine the constitutional question in advance. Evidence of the beliefs and intentions of the legislature or executive may help to answer the

The judicial branch is a mystery to most citizens. The other two branches of government – the executive and the legislative – rely on communication and interaction with their constituency through campaigning, commenting and pushing for their causes. In contrast, the judiciary is more cloistered and has traditionally held itself away from the people in order to be more neutral and independent of the other two branches of government. As such, the judicial

The President of the United States, as stated by the Supreme Court, has the jurisdiction to appoint supreme court justices based on their own interpretation of what will benefit the country the most. In addition, United State’s citizens have already casted their vote. Because of this, the citizens have put their faith in him to complete all this duties effectively, which includes the appointment of justices when one resigns or dies. Although, it is necessary for there to be checks and balances with the senate put in place for such an important appointment so that one branch of the government does not overstep their responsibilities and become too powerful.

This paper is going to describe the road from arrest to Supreme Court, and the two ways a

When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

In 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall made a decision that affirmed the power of the Supreme Court for the future. Leading up to that decision, President John Adams was leaving office, but before he did so, he appointed several judges, which the Senate approved. However, the commissions that gave the judges office were not all delivered before Adams left office. The new Secretary of State, James Madison, refused to deliver the commissions on the grounds that since they hadn’t been delivered yet, so they were

Per Lord Justice Laws, R (MISICK) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 1549

If the judiciary are intentionally straying into matters of governmental policy then they as unelected, impartial adjudicators should only do so when cases arise that call for such action, potentially when governmental action threatens the rule of law – a right afforded to them as a constitutional check on governmental power. While the judiciary can be viewed as in a constant skirmish with the Legislature and the Executive much of the judiciary’s power to interoperate statutes liberally comes from powers delegated to it by parliament .

The Supreme Court of India has adopted a forward-looking approach since last few years, particularly having regard to the socio-economic conditions prevailing in the country. In fact there are two kinds of approaches which characterise the functioning of the highest Court in every