A Comparative Study of “The History Boys,” and “3 Idiots” Essays

A person who is called a friend almost always thinking for your greater good, but what if they had an ulterior motive? The true identity of said person may closely resemble this friend in question. All the prosperity of any work, or deed done gravitates to this person, while the suffering party remains stuck behind in the shambles created not by them. An internal conflict often bubbles within, questioning if the name of victim belongs to their status. Yet, by the time awareness has struck, all but one remains in good graces. The importance of seeing the worst before it comes does not always come along. “The Headstrong Historian” and Things Fall Apart symbolizes what is good for one is bad for another.

What is the main argument the author makes and how does it apply to contemporary education?

3. The author compares today’s school system to that of the past, which concerned itself with teaching students,

This scene is also significant for how it challenges Irwin 's revisionist approach to history. In approaching the holocaust topic, Irwin suggests that it is a “question of tone (and) tact”(P71), which Hector contradicts saying, “not tact, decorum”(p71). This questions when studying the holocaust, should you be tactful, like Irwin believes; or whether there should be an objective standard towards the common decency of the discussion. Irwin’s use of the meretricious is also called into question when Scripps comments “what’s truth got to do with it”(p72). The by applying the meretricious to the holocaust, Irwin takes the step to considering it as no real or historical value. Furthermore, his inclusion of “for a start”(p73) suggests there are other concerns beside values and truth, therefore, untruthfulness is not by itself enough to discredit a historical view. Irwin’s revisionist approach relies on intriguing opinions riddled with falsity, over the monotonous truth. Irrelevant facts in exams matters more to Irwin than the fact that it is untrue, which is implied when he explains he “doesn’t think” its “true for a start”(p73), which is only stated because he has already called truth “inexpediant”(p73). In addition, his inconclusive objection to Dakins near Holocaust denial as “…inexpedient”(p73), features his lack of compassion through his revisionist approach. In light of this opinion that the “death camps” have to be seen in “context of

There are many controversies that american public education system does more harm than good. In “Against School” by John Taylor Gatto and “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by Jean Anyon, explains how school education destructively impacts us. Gatto states his experience as a public school teacher and why he “just can’t do it anymore”. He was tired how the schooling was programmed. He argues how school system are affecting students to be more like “childlike” citizens. Also, Anyon demonstrates her research on how there are many different kind of education depending what “class” you were. She informs us that there is an inequality in “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work”. Both authors depicts the reality and truth, that some people are unable to see. As a student, I’ve also experience this and support how school depicts how we are in the future. Moreover, there are many representations that explains why the american public education systems does more harm than good.

The first two chapters of “What the Best College Students Do” cover several topics. Throughout the chapters, the lives and experiences of different college students are explored. A reoccurring theme in the book is the concept of learning styles. Essentially, the three learning styles are memorization, comprehension, and strategy. According to the author, comprehension is the most effective style of learning. While everyone will possess one of these three learning styles, it is not impossible for someone to adjust to another style. Additionally, the author elaborates on academic ideas such as independence, grades, and outside influences.

In Alan Bennett’s play, The History Boys, a unique approach to education is continuously made by Hector, an aged english teacher, and Irwin, a young and ambitious “Oxford” graduate. Rather than solely focusing on his students future college endeavors, Hector chooses to highlight what he deems as important in the “real world”, as more exists to him than an acceptance letter to Cambridge or Oxford. On the other hand, Irwin places college at the utmost importance, continuously reinforcing this idea in multiple fashions. Throughout the course of the play, characters such as Irwin and the Headmaster provide a stark contrast to Hector's views, well simultaneously highlighting the underlying reasonability in each others’ ways.

A Comparison of World War I and World War II World War I and World War II, while started by much of the same

If we are thinking about effect of education – or the lack of it – on our nature, there is another comparison we can make.”(The Allegory of the Cave by Plato p.1) Plato was a philosopher in Classical Greece; he was fighting for freedom and education. Malcolm X was an African-American Muslim who was fighting for human rights. We have two stories one is “The Allegory of the Cave” and “Learning to read”, why do we have to compare this two stories? Can we conclude some very important things after reviewing? Education is a very strong tool in our hands, and how to learn right is concurrent part of our life. In this stories we can find two different ways how to study, even though stories have some same ideas, they are different. I have several reasons why they are different and how are they similar.

13. “Brilliantly funny….but by the end, tears are as near as laughter.” To what extent can we read The History boys as comedy?

The History boys is a journey of a group of Northern working and middle class grammar school boys, who are aspiring to get into - Oxbridge on scholarships, with the aid of two contrasting teachers, one who believes that education is solely for the purpose of grades and another who teaches ‘gobbets of information’ for the purpose of personal gain.

“The History Boys” and “Educating Rita” have common themes running through the spine of each text, regarding formal education and learning for self-satisfaction. The History boys tells the story of 8 academic working and middle class boys from a grammar school in Sheffield whom are applying for Oxford and Cambridge university in the 1980’s and are studying intensely to succeed. Their teachers, Hector and Irwin have a conflicting approach to education. Irwin teaches the boys specifically how to pass their exams but contrarily Hector teaching style encourages learning for the purpose of obtaining knowledge. Bennett comments on these differing types of education via the characters of Hector and Irwin. Educating Rita, set also in the 1980’s and located in Northern England is about a woman who enters the world of formal university education as a mature student on an Open University course. She has never had a strict and authentic education as she comes from a working class background, so she wants to prove to herself that she can triumph and live a better life. Both scripts imply that formal education can be obtained, however at the compromise of individual intellectual flare and distinctiveness. Initially in the text, Rita and the group of boys both are unrefined, raw and sincere with their way of viewing and analysing scholarly stimulus. However they both lose this quality as the plays progress due to the education system moulding them to pass exams and not to obtain wisdom.

There are many different theories of how people learn and in considering their application to how students learn and how teachers teach; educational programmes must be of holistic value. Learning according to the humanistic theory speaks to the holistic value that must be communicated through the process of acquiring new

I cannot write this essay without reference to study of my own experienced and my daughter’s- placed in the harsh environment of the government schooling system and its observations of the stark belief systems of “the child to fit the system” and not “the system to fit the child” with reference to the what education should be about. This means different things to different people. To some this means a teacher teaching and passive learning taking place, the outcome is expected at the end of each year that each child has to achieve the same outcome and is graded accordingly.

The definition of history, is a question which has sparked international debate for centuries between the writers, readers, and the makers of history. It is a vital topic which should be relevant in our lives because it?s important to acknowledge past events that have occurred in our world that deeply influences the present. This essay will discuss what history is, and why we study it.