In Shadow of A Doubt, the audience is hit with a thriller about Young Charlie who shares the name of her favorite uncle, whom she has a special bond with. She feels that her handsome uncle is the only one that understands her and makes her feel bigger than the small town she lives in. However, when Uncle Charlie arrives, things start changing between the two Charlies. A series of unusual clues connecting to the “Merry Widow Murderer” are very similar to her Uncle Charlie and his nice, charming, loving behavior changes to something more sinister. Young Charlie starts to find out that her charming uncle that she loves very dearly is not what he seems to be. While feeling broken, she realizes that her life might be in danger. Throughout the film, the audience can see different visual styles of Hitchcock like the …show more content…
The two movies have two characters that have light vs dark. For example, the two characters on Strangers on A Train, Bruno and Guy, are two men who are supposedly total opposites. This is very similar to the two Charlies in Shadow of a Doubt. They share the same message, while both of the characters in both stories are linked to the world of darkness and death. Just like Shadow of a Doubt, there are two women wearing glasses and a pair of drinks that are doubles. In the beginning of the story, it had its moments of doubling. It also shares the theme of psychological and sexual pathologies, stated in “The Art of Alfred Hitchcock.” The idea of the Guy-Bruno homosexual engagement is daring for its time. This helps the narrative’s broader reference of the theme of two aspects of one personality. Guy didn't share the feelings Bruno had for Guy. Bruno came across as obsessed. This is different from Shadow of a Doubt, but the psychological idea was there. The two men symbolize balancing features of human
Throughout history, Georg Simmel and W.E.B. Du Bois have had a significant influence on important theories and ideas developed in the Social Sciences. Perhaps two of the most relevant and well-known concepts developed by both of these theorists are the concepts of “double consciousness” and “the stranger”. In this paper I will be analyzing both of these pieces of work to draw upon differences and similarities between the two. The similarities I will be elaborating on are the usage of the paradoxical figure, which both Simmel and Du Bois discuss in their theories, and the coexisting feeling of division from mainstream society. The difference between the two theories that I will be exploring is the perception that mainstream society has of
While reading The Stranger I noticed that traits that Albert Camus character depicts in the book are closely related to the theories of Sigmund Freud on moral human behavior. Albert Camus portrays his character of Meursault as a numb, emotionless person that seems to mindlessly play out his role in society, acting in a manner that he sees as the way he’s supposed to act, always living in the moment with his instincts driving him, and if the right circumstance presents itself the primal deep seeded animal will come out. I believe that most of the character’s traits fall under Freud’s notion of the Id and Ego mental apparatus, and don’t believe that his idea of the super-ego is represented in this book.
In Strangers on a Train, it was interesting seeing the differences in Bruno and Guy. The first thing we see about Bruno is his black and white wingtip shoes, which are in stark contrast to Guy’s plain shoes. Guy dresses in a very simple, but nice manner, whereas we have Bruno with his lobster tie, and tie clip with his name on it.
Although the stories’ main components mirror each other, they still differentiate. For example, in “The Devil and Tom Walker,” everyone believes Tom has made a deal with the devil, whereas in “Young Goodman Brown,” the author questions the actuality of the night’s events: “Had Goodman Brown fallen asleep in the forest and only dreamed a wild dream of a witch-meaning?” Even if the incidents never did transpire, Goodman Brown could not return to his Christian life. On the other hand, Tom Walker tried living a Christian life again, but the devil still carried him off. The protagonists’ relationship with their wives also varied between the stories. Goodman Brown loved his seemingly innocent wife, Faith; while Tom Walker hated his termagant wife and though he
In the movie Doubt, the idea of certainty versus doubt is a central theme to the story. Doubt and certainty are
Most adults would do anything to protect a child. Sister Aloysius did everything she could to make sure Father Flynn would not hurt anymore child. In the play Doubt: a Parable by John Patrick Shanley, Father Flynn, a priest at St. Nicholas, a Catholic church and school in the Bronx, New York, 1964 is questioned whether or not he has been in an inappropriate relationship with an 8th grade colored kid named Donald Mueller. One of the nuns at the school, Sister James tells the principle of the school, Sister Aloysius, her suspicions of the relationship between Father Flynn and Donald and that she smelt wine in his breath. Sister Aloysius questions the priest of the relationship but he denies it and tells her Donald, who was also an altar boy who had access to wine, took some and the priest told no one because he wanted to keep Donald safe. Sister Aloysius meets with Donald’s mother to inform her of the situation but she overlooks it because she needs him to finish 8th grade at the school and Father Flynn is the only one who is friendly to Donald. Father Flynn and Sister Aloysius meet again and she threatens Father Flynn to confess because of information she got from a nun at his last parish. Father Flynn still denies the relationship but he then goes to a different school to be a priest. Based on the evidence in Patrick Shanley’s play, Doubt: A Parable, I conclude Father Flynn is guilty based on his behavior and other evidence against him.
In the 1943 film “Shadow of a Doubt” by Alfred Hitchcock the action in this movie is more important than any other topic. This film was a mix between action and mystery which grabs the attention of the viewer. Uncle Charlie played a big role in the mystery part of the film by hiding from the police for the kills that he committed. When uncle Charlie went to his sister’s home, no one knew that he was the killer until little charlie figured it out and helped the detectives catch him. Little charlie got her uncle to leave town so that her mother wouldn’t find out about the murders her brother committed. Uncle Charlie thought that hiding at his sister’s house and playing it off as visiting would get him away from the police and no one would know of his crimes. At the beginning of the movie when the detectives outside Charlie’s house I knew that something was going on, so it got me engaged into the movie. When the killing started being said I was sceptical, kind of thinking “no it’s someone else” but later on in the movie when everything was piecing together I knew it was uncle Charlie and it was shocking. There are many things I like about this film, which is the acting in the characters. The acting is amazing, usually in old movies the acting isn’t that great but, I feel like the
way that have deep hidden meanings. Also, authors in both stories uses symbolism to identify
Both men come across interesting characters to say the least. They were interested and curious when it came to these characters, and felt the need to investigate them, often leading to misfortune. Though this is not positive, it is a similarity.
The novel “Doubt; A Parable” by John Patrick Shanley, creates doubts and mystery in readers minds that have us turning the pages, curious of what will happen next. “Doubt” creates a lot of different opinions and perspectives, and raises a lot of important discussions. You see that values play a big part in the way that we think, and the way that we see others. It blocks our perspective on people, and makes things seem very one-sided, in order to live life to it’s fullest potential you need to not just look at your own beliefs but others as well. It creates doubt in readers’ minds whether or not Father Flynn is guilty by showing us different sides of characters and making us feel uncertain about our beliefs.
Our dark ideas can sometimes lead us to choose the way things are perceived, the unquestioned beliefs we hold reinforce our nature of certainty consequently clouding our judgment of the truth, and making it difficult for us to see beyond the darkness. Doubt is a story about A Catholic school in the Bronx, throughout the story a judgment is formed through the dislike of Father Flynn, which is the Schools Priest. Sister Aloysius overcasts her ideas on father Flynn and eventually accuses him of wrongfully being involved with a troubled young African American Boy who's experienced considerable difficulties in school, due to racial, and sexual orientation. In this film, we can see character development in sister Aloysius,she presents a darkened way of thinking, and single mindlessly pursued to show this sunless perception of her ideology.
Doubt by John Patrick Shanley is about a nun who is entirely convinced that a priest had done something inappropriate to one of the students and taken advantage of the fact that the student (Donald Muller) is an African American. Sister Aloysius Beauvier, the nun, concluded that Father Flynn, the priest, had been forcing Donald Muller to drink wine and molesting him. With the help of a naive nun named Sister James, Sister Aloysius attempted to investigate her assumption of Father Flynn’s actions even if it meant contacting Donald’s mother. Sister Aloysius is a stereotypical splenetic Catholic School nun who believes that being an unsympathetic and oppressive person to the students is the most effective method in order to make the students oblige to her commands. The literary theory chosen for this literature work is the Freudian literary theory. Freudian literary theory is based on the works of Sigmund Freud and workings of the mind and instinct as well as sexuality. The play Doubt and Freudian literary theory can be related because Freud’s work reveals the id, ego and superego and how it affects a person. Id is a natural instinct. Ego ensures that the impulses of the id is expressed in an acceptable behavior. Superego provides guidelines and morals for making judgments. (Brizee) Sister Aloysius’ id desires to get rid of Father Flynn immediately. Her superego is diminished since she lied to Father Flynn. Her ego is shown
Albert Camus creates a series of characters in The Stranger whose personality traits and motivations mirror those that are overlooked upon by the average man. Camus develops various characters and scenarios that show true humanity which tends to have been ignored due to the fact of how typical it has become. Camus incorporates abominable personality traits of the characters, variety, consistency, and everyone’s fate.
“The Little Stranger” is a 2009 gothic novel written by Sarah Waters. It is a ghost story set in a dilapidated mansion in Warwickshire, England in the 1940s. This novel features a male narrator, a country doctor who makes friends with a family with faded fortunes left simply with a very old estate that is crumbling around them. The stress of reconciling the state of their finances with the familial responsibility of keeping the estate coincides with perplexing events which may or may not be of supernatural origin, culminating in tragedy.
In Vertigo, Hitchcock begins with building credibility and composure in Scottie’s character. The film starts off with a chasing scene in