A Comparison Of Acts One And Act One

One of the Aspects that changes about Martin throughout the story to make him the most dynamic character is his respect towards

Act Two Then the conflict is right after that, when Lengel notices the three girls standing there to checkout Lengel’s treatment to the girls created some conflict with Sammy: protagonist; however Lengel’s heart was in the right place. Looking out for the town, both males and females, before hormones rage and caused someone to act on a wrong impulse and got someone hurt. Whatever the case may be, Lengel has morals obviously, playing the role of the antagonist and creating obstacles. The rising action I feel like Sammy was more interested in examining and wanting to learn more about Queenie than work, because he couldn’t stay focused. The crisis of act two is when Lengel asks “Sammy, have you rung up

The bell rings for lunch, all the kids exist the classroom. John and Tim sit at a table and discuss their day.

Act 2 starts with Amos finding out about Roxie’s pregnancy, but while he is calling out for attention to let everyone know that he is the dad, no one notices him like he is invisible. After Roxie returns back to prison with all of the attention on her, she has a huge argument with Billy because Roxie thinks that she is calling all the shots now because she came up with the idea of being pregnant to get her back on the publicity train. Roxie then fires Billy thinking she can do everything on her own, later to realize that a woman was executed without a lawyer. Roxie then freaks out and calls Billy to have him be her lawyer again. When the trial date comes, Billy tells Roxie that if she puts on a show she will be fine. During court Roxie acts innocent while Billy does all the talking. The judge proclaims

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, is a dramatic play, or perhaps a number of plays within a play. Hamlet himself is the greatest actor throughout the play. The acting motif, used in Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, is mirrored through practically every scene and affects each character.

The acts work together by giving information like who stole the vase and other things. A piece of text evidence to support my answer is when they text states,”ACT ONE:[The curtain opens on the music room of the mansion. DIANA is singing as RUPERT plays the piano. The guests are seated in rows of chairs around the piano, listening with complete attention. The exception is FENWICK BARNES, who is clearly falling asleep in the back row. As DIANA hits a long high note, the sleeping BARNES falls back into a shelf. A large vase falls off the shelf into his lap. He catches it. Only WENDY, the maid, sees what caused the vase to fall. She gasps. The concert stops, and everyone turns to BARNES.]

The director that does the best job presenting act three is Kenneth Branagh. In Branagh’s act threethe tone of the movie is much more positive and the scenes are far more colorful than the other two versions. The colorfulness does a better job of portraying act three since everybody other than Hamlet is having funand not grieving the death of the king. This is where the other two versions aren’t as great. In those two interpretations, the film is darker and depressing which does not encompass what is actually happening in the story.

The second scene of the fourth act follows Macduff’s leave, as Lady Macduff is upset about her husband leaving her and her son during such a dire time. This scene also entails the murder of Macduff’s son, which was ordered by Macbeth in a previous scene. Within this situation, there are a few key components which make it significant. Primarily, the dialogue between Lady Macduff and Ross exposes Lady Macduff’s lament over her husband’s absence, as he now seems suspicious, despite doing nothing wrong. Moreover, while she explains this to her son, he displays courage and wisdom beyond his years, as he understands the greater issue of the problem at hand.

In Act 1 Macbeth has been put into a serious dilemma. Macbeth has to decide if he is going to kill King Duncan or not to become the King of Cawdor. Macbeth learned from 3 witches the news that he was going to become the King of Cawdor. The second Witch said “All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, thane of Cawdor!”

Shakespeare is a name recognized by all to be that of one of the greatest playwrights of all time. There is no surprise that many of Shakespeare’s works are later turned into a movie. Director Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh both have a distinct interpretation of Hamlet Act V. Franco Zeffirelli's adaptation of Shakespeare's tragedy was much darker than Brangan’s version. The settings, costumes and the props were all medieval. It was set in a dark castle with stony gray bricks, the characters wore dirty clothes, and the props were mostly wooden or made out of metal. The physical elements in Zeffirelli show that it took place in 15 century during the dark ages. In Franco Zeffirelli’s version the characters didn’t use a lot of emotions

plot of the play. After all, in Act Four we not only have the lovers

It is really in the telling of the second act that the story of The Fantasticks begins to soar. Because it is at this point we begin to see the contrast between the young lover's idealized vision of love and the reality of trying to maintain love in a world full of thieves, cheats, and charlatans. As the second act begins, we see the actors, the Fathers and the Boy and Girl, in the same exact

On the surface, the distribution of goods of the early church found in Acts chapter four is an advertisement for Communism. The book of Acts delineates a society lacking in poverty resulting from the lack private ownership and the distribution of goods. The Lord commands humans to follow in his footsteps. “For God called you to do good, even if it means suffering, just as Christ suffered for you. He is your example, and you must follow in his steps.” (1 Peter 2:21 ESV). Thus, on the surface, it is logical to assume a Christian should embrace socialism or declare themselves a hypocrite before the Lord.

Mrs. Park wakes up from a nightmare of the car accident of her parent’s death, prompted her want to save her daughter from Bill.

One of the characters that does not changes drastically in the second act is Edward. He is now a grown, openly gay man, still feminine by nature, the sole difference is that he is now living with his partner Gerry. Edward’s natural character yearns to be similar to the role of a housewife. The sort of housewife who wants to cook, clean, and look after every need for his partner. It is clear the dynamic of power that exists between Edward and Gerry—Edward is the bottom and Gerry is the top: “I don’t know what you mean. Everyone’s always tried to stop me being feminine and now you are too” (70). The nature of Edward is not altered from act one to act two, his intrinsic identity as a feminine homosexual connects with Edwards’s desire to be in a monogamous relationship. The stereotype with which Churchill plays in the second act, which is brought from act one, is that all feminine women wanted to marry a man and become housewives. The housewife role becomes an identity for Edward. On the contrary, the character Gerry, does not seem to be as pleased with the power of dynamic, as Edward is, since he is not being forced into any acquired identity—he (Edward) is being himself. There are times wherein the dynamics of power switches, in other words, homosexual relationships vary on deciding for a particular sexual position, some partners are versatile instead of opting for one definitive sexual position. But Edward seems to be highly aware and sure of his role: “I like doing the