A Comparison Of Ifrs And Gaap

This research project will inform the reader of the difference between the United States accounting standards and International accounting standards. The United States uses the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to issue financial reporting procedures. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). There are proposals for the United States to adopt the International standards. Financial reporting procedures are debated about the United States using the Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures (GAAP) or following the global procedures. This

When stakeholders and other interested parties evaluate possible future investments opportunities or financial lending to a corporation, they take a close look at a firm’s performance which is highly measured by revenue; a necessary tool in decision-making. The GAAP standards in the U.S. however are very different from standards by the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards), and both boards are in need of revision.

There are several differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The IFRS is considered more of a "principles based" accounting standard in contrast to U.S. GAAP which is considered more "rules based." By being more "principles based", IFRS, arguably, represents and captures the economics of a transaction better than U.S. GAAP. As a team me collaborated to answer the following seven questions.

Măciucă, Ursache, Moroşan, and Apetri (2014) state IFRS and GAAP are two similar systems but they are not identical. IFRS has been accepted by the U.S. since 2008. Prior to 2008, companies had to reconcile financial records into GAAP format. Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Boards (IASB) must continue to merge both standards for the benefit of all. Smith (2012) analyzed the financial data from international companies operating in the U.S. in 2005 and 2006 and discovered no significant differences between GAAP and IFRS. The differences between GAAP and IFRS can be cosmetic and substantive (p.

The United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have both similarities and differences that must be explored. In 2002 the similarities became more concrete and the differences were mitigated with the Norwalk Agreement, which was a memorandum of understanding between the United States and the International Accounting Standards Board (Financial, 2002). The agreement stated that the two sides were both looking for compatible accounting standards that could be used in both cross-border and domestic reporting (Financial, 2002). By making the US standards and other accounting standards compatible with one another, there is a higher chance of helping investors determine which companies would be the best choice for them. It is also easier for mergers and acquisitions, as well as other financial transactions between companies, if the accounting requirements are very similar between the US and other countries, since fewer discrepancies are seen (AICPA, 2008; American, 2009).

This paper looks at relevant comparisons of IFRS, “International Financial Reporting Standards” and GAAP, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. These two frameworks of accounting principles and practices share a lot of standards and procedures, but also differ on accepted policies. This paper will answer those standards and differences but also show the comparison of the two.

Pace University | ACC 649 Contemporary Accounting Issues FALL 2016 | 70159 | Instructor: Dr. Kwang-Hyun Chung Research Proposal: Will the transition from U. S. GAAP to IFRS only have an effect on Financial Reporting? Abstract: The purpose of this research is to analyze if the transition from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the United States only has an effect on financial reporting. Throughout this paper, I will explain the advantages and disadvantages of adopting IFRS. Also, I will also identify the differences between both standards and how it affects other aspects of a company’s business operations. In essence, reporting under IFRS has its pros and cons but it is ultimately up to the Securities and Exchange Committee to fully implement what standard they want to U.S businesses to follow. Prepared by: Sharon Williams Introduction Over the last several years, the controversy of the United States adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has been a significant issue for many businesses who are pro Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Although U.S GAAP has been the common accounting principles for many countries, specifically the US, now countries are adopting IFRS. In addition, there are many organizations such as European Union (EU) and International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC), who want domestic and international businesses to have one

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) are working together to eliminate a variety of difference between the United States generally accepted accounting procedures (U.S. GAAP or GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This convergence project grew out of an agreement reached by the two boards in 2002 (Deloitte, 2004).

The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) have some similarities and differences when it comes to accounting for liabilities. There are steps that are taken by both the FASB and IASB to move to fair value measurement for financial instruments. There are some differences between these approaches.

In the world today, the use of IFRS is the most common accounting method. They are accounting principles that have been adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). In 2002, the European Union (EU) required firms listed on their markets to use IFRS when presenting their consolidated financial statements. By 2009, the EU and over 100 countries now use IFRS or are converging to them (Reineking, C., Chamberlain, D. H., Rudolph, H. R., & Smith, L. M., 2013).

The US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) is a set of international accounting rules which originated from the United States. US GAAP can be defined as a set of accounting principles, standards and procedures that companies use to compile their financial statements (Elliott & Elliott, 2008). The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on the other hand are accounting rules originating from the United Kingdom. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are a set of accounting rules designed with a common global language for business affairs so that financial accounts of companies are understandable and comparable across international boundaries (Devinney, Pedersen & Tihanyi, 2010).

Financial reporting standards and requirements are different in every country, and because of the different standards and requirements, it may create more accounting errors and inconsistencies in the company’s financial statement. The first reason to delay the convergence from GAAP and IFRS is their fundamental differences in the reporting

In this paper, I am going to talk first about the differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS; then I am going to talk about the similarities between U.S. GAAP and IFRS; and finally I am

The standards by which financial statements are reported are known as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) (Finkler, Jones, & Kovner, 2013).  The United States (US) recognizes GAAP to be a set of rules used by accountants in financial reporting (Finkler et al., 2013).  The United States-GAAP (US-GAAP) were established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (Finkler et al., 2013). The US-GAAP are primarily used in the US whereas many other countries have adopted their own general accounting standards known as the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) (Finkler, Ward, & Calabrese, 2013). The IFRS were established by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and have both similarities and differences to the US-GAAP (Finkler et al., 2013).   The purpose of GAAP are to standardize the manner in which the financial status of an organization is interpreted so financial information is useful for investors, lenders and those that an organization is accountable to or compared to (Finkler et al., 2013).

Similar to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) governance of U.S. GAAP in the United States, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed in 2001 to be the governing body responsible for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). IFRS standards are beginning to be recognized globally as the leading accounting standards. Since 2002, the IASB and FASB have been committed to agreeing on unified international accounting standards. The ultimate goal is for IFRS to replace U.S. GAAP for the United States and be the new requirement for reporting for public companies. In the meantime, there are around 120 countries that already permit or require IFRS reporting and 90 countries that have fully adopted