preview

A Comparison Of Mel Gibson's To Be Or Not To Be

Decent Essays

The Mel Gibson version of the soliloquy ‘To be or not to be…’ was the best version of the soliloquy out of all eight that were viewed by the class. There are a variety of reasons as to why this is the case. One reason is that Gibson was dressed in traditional robes similar to those worn in Shakespearean times as well, he was wearing a bodkin. Also, since ‘To be or not to be..’ is often associated with suicide and death, the setting of the scene was perfect in the sense that Gibson enters a crypt as he begins his speech as it is like he is descending into death and it foreshadows Hamlet’s potential death, whether by his own hand or not. During his speech he did not unsheath his bodkin and hold it next to his neck as a reference to self-mutilation, …show more content…

While delivering his speech Burton was very withdrawn and did not have the same intensity as Hamlet had in the original play. It almost seems as though Burton was holding back from being passionate. He was severely underdressed, just wearing a black v-neck, similar to the one that Branagh was wearing. Burton wasn’t even carrying a bodkin. The bodkin is directly referenced in the play and should therefore be considered significant to the performance. The setting of the scene was extremely bland and boring. In all seven other versions the settings were all interesting e.g. The Hawke version took place in a Blockbuster, the Oliver version took place by the shore, the Branagh version took place in a luxurious castle. Perhaps the setting does not mean as much as the delivery of the speech, however it seems as though Burton was just a boring Hamlet, in a boring abandoned warehouse, delivering an uninspiring, tasteless soliloquy. The assertion that Burton’s behavior is alike to that of a suicidal person is acceptable, but after a second look it seems that Burton is just indifferent and does not capture Shakespeare’s true intentions for the character of

Get Access