A Critical Analysis of P&G’s Chinese Competitiveness

Procter and Gamble Co. also know as P&G, is an American multinational consumer goods company, founded by William Procter and James Gamble. Its products include cleaning agents and personal care products. It has in its kitty global brands such as Ariel and Tide in the Fabric care segments and Head & Shoulder, Pantene and Rejoice is the Hair care segment. For this case study selects P&G Company as it has an important role in the consumer segment products. As P&G was a popular company, the financials statement shows better performance in the previous year.

The three most critical challenges Starbucks faced in China were political restrictions, socio- cultural, economic and financial challenges. China is highly bureaucratic country with difficult processes of getting permissions and sanctions to start and run business. The biggest challenges for Starbucks were the old tradition of tea drinking in China. At the beginning Starbucks managers didn’t how to accustom Chinese to drinking coffee; to acquaint employees and Chinese executives with coffee drinking experience Starbucks provided different training programs for them in which they learned more about coffee and Starbucks’ culture.

Based upon my knowledge learned on financial reporting, I had compared to companies reporting statistics. The two companies in comparison are PepsiCo Incorperated and The Coca-Cola Company in which both have reported annual statistics for 2004 and 2005. During my comparison of net incomes, gross expenses, stock statistics, and assets accumulations, I have suggested some strategies for each business to take into consideration for better future results. As an accountant in training, I will be giving specific details of my analysis and recommendations, as these are my opinions for financial success.

In 2011, CEO of P&G - Mr. Robert McDonald mentioned that he is on a mission and that is to make P&G the most technologically enabled business in the world. And he get it all started by digitalizing operations everywhere which has eventually contributed to reduction of cost, time and effort, reaping better product yet higher profitability.

The final project is going to be about the market entry of Starbucks into China. This project will focus on gauging the success of the company's market entry strategy thus far. Starbucks has announced in a press release that it believes China will be its #2 market by 2014, and the company has been one of the most successful American companies in that market (Starbucks, 2012). The company entered the Chinese market in 1999 with a store in Beijing. This followed the acquisition of greater knowledge about Chinese business culture through outlets in Taiwan. The company initially used a licensing agreement to enter the Chinese market (Starbucks, 2010).

The main issue of the P&G Korea case is centered around the question of market share. P&G and Unilever are the two major market shareholders in the Korean detergent industry holding 80-85% of the total market share. The remaining 15-20% of the market is held by low-priced local Korean brands. There are no new markets either company can tap for further market share since most Korean households already use laundry detergent, making the market saturated. Other than peripheral chemical changes claimed to be “improvements”, there are no major innovations to be explored for product development or diversification. Per Ansoff’s strategic opportunities matrix, P&G and Unilever are both focused on Market Penetration,

Consequently P&G aimed to increase its innovative capacity and speed in order to accelerate global rollout of products and brands throughout new structures and policies. This was the main goal of Organization 2005:

P&G need to work hard and do more research and development in order to produce higher quality, more innovative, and more unique in products in order to answer consumer’s need and compete with those major world brand competitors.

Due to the consequences of the recent financial crisis, the company has observed a significant decline in the investment activities of its clients all over the world. These consequences brought negative impacts to its financial performance.

This paper aims to explore the cultural barriers that GM encounters while doing business in China especially in terms of language and Asian mind difference. As a matter of fact, we cannot examine all the cultural barriers due to the scope of the paper. On the other hand, some differences emerging from different thinking behavior between US and China are exemplified in the second part of the paper. In the first part, the company information and the SWOT analysis of GM are given before going further with the Asian operations of the company.

• We recommand P&G to directly invest in this market by focusing only on Marketing and Distribution to roll out SK-II (a special product) in a foreign market. It should not be an advantage for P&G to acquire subsidiaries, or to license or to franchise because resources and capabilities of SK-II are located in Japan. It would be difficult to find same raw materiels to produce SK-II in another country. Exporting SK-II in a foreign market will be better, for that they should emphasize on: • Differentiation advantage, • Changing customer behavior, • Product positionning, • Pricing policy, • Advertisement, • Counseler team…

P&G Japan had been a minor contributor to the company’s international growth. By 1984, with the company board thought it was time to exit the market, Then CEO Ed Artzt, convinced the board that Japan was strategically important and that the new country GM could turn things around.

How does Alibaba group create corporate advantage? (Why are the businesses under one roof?) Is this corporate advantage sustainable?

Procter & Gamble (P&G) is a world-leading producer of consumer goods. Today, it consists of over 20 million dollar brands (like Gillette) and operates in 42 countries

Suggested actions include operational ones for immediate actions and strategic ones for a longer period of time in the future so that Apple can still maintain its image in China market. Besides, these specific activities are also prioritized based on the urgency of each one.