A Critical Evaluation Of Theological Background

Better Essays

Lehman Strauss’ article, “Why God became Man” defends and explains the reasons for the Incarnation of Jesus Christ by offering a strong Christian perspective and leveraging biblical text. Strauss was a Bible teacher, author, and speaker. He claimed his message was “for plain people.” Wilbur Smith declared Strauss’ Revelation study was the most helpful volume of the twentieth century. The following review presents a critical evaluation of theological background, topical understating, argument construction, opposing viewpoints, topic balance, focus, and conclusions found in the article.
Theological Background
The article explores the legitimacy of the Incarnation of Jesus and displays Strauss’ strong Christian view. …show more content…

An explanation of Philippians 2:5-10 and a seven-point presentation demonstrating Jesus’ humanity is next. He concludes with an additional seven points to show why Jesus came to dwell on earth. Strauss is sensitive to explain important terms and concepts like the definition of light and the beliefs of Docetism. Of particular note is his differentiation of the Incarnation as the “reality” and the Virgin Birth as the “method.”
Opposite Views and Arguments
Strauss counters arguments without deviating from the topic and occasionally presents opposing views such as evolution. Most subjects are only briefly touched and quickly refuted. Conversely, he does react significantly to the issue of anti-Semitism and argues for Jewish national restoration and regeneration. It is clear that the author’s intention is to teach believing Christians and not to argue with secular worldviews. One potential concern is a statement that the elements to create man’s body were “created long before man.” This assertion could cause some dissension among traditional believers who are short-term creationists.
Topic Balance
Representing a Christian worldview Strauss builds his case mostly using scripture as the source of truth. He conclusively declares, “Christ’s kingdom is literal.” However, he does not ignore opposing views such as Docetism. Since the topic

Get Access