A Dead End For Humanity

In most cases, some people think that it is not important for them that several languages die out every year because they believe that if there are fewer languages in the world that means they need not to learn so many languages at all and their life will be easier to have a communication with foreign people. While others do not think so, which sound reasonable but ironical based on the fickle situation in society and history. Because for me, despite the adventure of being entitled as ‘absolutist’, I will consistently support that it is significant to prevent the truth that several languages die out every year.

According to Kees and Bot (1995), language attrition in the other words is loss of language skills. There are both bad and good news from the research. For the bad news, it basically tells us that everyone is a loser because everyone is going to lose the language. And this language loss can be divided into group and individual level. Group means that a group of people started to shift from speaking an original language to another new language, and the next generation started to stop using the old language. Because of that, the old language is died and get loss. Another loss is the individual loss. It means that individual has loss the language when it is in need.

Ken Wiwa presents several ideas pertaining to language and culture within his essay, Get Beyond Babel. Wiwa explains that every language has a chance of dying out over time. For any language to survive through years of societal changes, it must be adapted so it can be used to embrace other cultures, new technology and new perspectives. Wiwa presents the concept that language is the same as culture. I do not agree with this concept because I believe that culture is carried by the people, not by the language.

One important thing I learned is that the world is expected to lose half of its languages in the next 100 years. This is particularly alarming because of the importance of biodiversity. The article refers to the fact that people speaking a certain language can hold certain knowledge that other people speaking a different

Over centuries we have seen the amount and complexity of languages all across the globe reduced. If this trend continues, we could see the number of world languages potentially reduced from 6,000 to 600 in the future. Colonization and urbanization has led to the abolishment of languages spoke by smaller and less dominant civilizations. McWhorter uses the Native Americans in North America and the Aboriginal

We may see teaching our children different languages as a means for them to communicate with our extender family and pass on our cultural heritage or as extender knowledge for the child. In addition to the aforementioned reasons to learn more than one language, research indicates there is

According to the research done by United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, 97% of the people are using only 4% of the world’s languages. While the assimilation of languages makes communication easier, it also causes nearly 50% of the existing languages to become endangered. Whether language extinction brings positive or negative effects is still long in debate.

Each year abundance languages vanished, in order to some groups reckon that it is not crucial. They consider the human speech as a shackle, in this manner life spare would be effortless in lack of it. On the other side of the controversy, the linguistic communication is attended as a vital part of the society. This essay is aimed at seeking the pro and con of both discussions, although I would prefer to go with the latter notion.

Of all the languages that exist in the world, not all of them will be at use in our lifetime. There will one that will surely die. A language dies when the people or the last people to speak it die. Their language dies with them. If we are not the speaker of that certain language or we are not even related to the group of speakers who speak it, do we have any concern about it? Do we even care about it?

To sum up, main reason of endangered languages is lack of native speakers. And It is sad to recognize that we can lost some part of our global culture. From the other side, we even could not imagine, how many languages we have not known

The article Language Death by David Crystal talks about language threats that are present and that will occur in future. He begins off talking about the risk of to minority languages. There are level headed discussions over the meaning of “language” and assessment of the quantity of language change, yet a figure some place around 6000 is conceivable. Maybe more vital is the circulation of speakers, with 4% of language representing 96% of individuals and 25% having less than 1000 speakers. There are diverse methods for ordering "threat levels", however there is doubtlessly countless face termination in the prompt future, while in the more extended term even generally language spoken might be in threat. Crysal points out five key arguments of

The pressure on languages can be money-based, social, cultural, religious, political, or any these combinations. The people who are directly affected are minorities, yet they are the bearers of most of the linguistic-based that has developed over the course of human history.

Languages are one of the most significant developments of humans. Language is one of the few means of communication which enclose a large number of beliefs, values and are provided paths to see the world in different perceptive. The languages are thought to be in danger when someone talks about native languages or mother’s tongue in foreign countries. Mother’s tongue is a child’s first language and it can be learned since birth. This mother’s language cannot be used often in foreign countries. As a result, significant numbers of languages are ceasing to pass from one generation to another. Cultural diversity and languages are essential assets of any nation, representing their identity across the world. According to UNESCO, people in several countries such as the USA, UK or Australia tried to adopt English as their common language at the expense of their mother tongue. It was widely agreed that native languages are extremely rich for any cultural and communal heritage because such languages represent not the only linkage of the speakers with their past but also expresses an identity. It is because of languages by which one deal with human experience and knowledge of the world. By losing such languages, there is far more chance of losing the heritage and cultural knowledge of ancestors. Additionally, Multilingualism and Bi are believed to be assets

David Crystal, a modern linguistic anthropologist, expresses the urgency of the matter. According to him, language is a repository of history and culture and every single language contributes to the whole cognitive framework of the human civilization (Ahearn, 2011). This means to say that every single lost language is a lost set of epistemological knowledge, techniques, culture and ways of living. David Harrison would even say that certain knowledge claims can only be found and learned in specific places around the globe that even advances in technology of America has not yet discovered (Harrison, 2012). This is an emergent problem that needs to be ceased and prevented. Linguists and anthropologists move to spread this urgent matter before even more endangered languages become extinct and even

Language is one of the most significant developments of humans. It is one of the few means of communications which enclose a large number of beliefs, values and are provided paths to see the world in different perceptive. The languages are thought to be in danger when people do not speak their native languages or mother tongue in foreign countries. Mother’s tongue is a child’s first language and it can be learned since birth. This mother’s language cannot be used often in foreign countries. As a result, significant numbers of languages are ceasing to pass from one generation to another. Cultural diversity and languages are essential assets of any nation, representing their identity across the world. According to UNESCO, people in several countries such as the USA, UK or Australia tried to adopt English as their common language at the expense of their mother tongue. It was widely agreed that native languages are extremely rich for any cultural and communal heritage because such languages represent not the only linkage of the speakers with their past but also expresses an identity (Baker). It is the language that contribute to the sum of human knowledge. By losing such languages, there is far more chance of losing the heritage and cultural knowledge of ancestors. Additionally, Multilingualism and Bi are believed to be assets for innovation and