A Deep Rooted And Almost Automatic Action People

Skidmore, Kaufman and Crowell (2016) found that 76.1% of students use alcohol and 38.6% of students use any illicit drug (p. 737). According to Skidmore, Kaufman and Crowell (2016) there are specific populations of students who have an increased risk of substance abuse. These at risk populations include: white men, first year students, athletes, students in fraternities and sororities, sexual minorities, and students with depression and anxiety (p.

She claims that after the nineteen-nineties, we all multitask with no regards to query. We allocate the majority of our time going back and forth between different tasks, and even worse, multiple tasks at the same time. Tugend’s article shows the reader that although multitasking may appear to

First hand, I observe and participate in multitasking when I arrive at work every day. The job description of serving should basically state, multitask, keep a good attitude, multitask, smile, clean, multitask. I think you get the jest that serving is the definition of multitasking. On a daily basis I juggle between several tables with needy customers who expect nothing but a tremendous dining experience. Also, while juggling tables I manage to serve drinks, food, cash out my customers, and even engage in one on one talk. In this instance,

Difficulty meeting academic responsibilities is one of the most common consequences of drug use and abuse. The relationship between drug use/abuse and the academic performance of college students rises every year that causes a critical issue on Colleges and Universities campus. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Task Force on College Drug reports that about 25 percent of college students report academic problems caused by drug use, such as earning lower grades, doing poorly on exams or papers, missing class dramatically, and falling behind. However, the history of drug abuse has been rooted in the early stages of life. Drug use/abuse has been classified as a major problem of students as early as in the fourth grade. Consequently, it

Even though smart phones are supposed to make working easier, studies have shown that they actually hurt our performance. In 2015, a Journal of Experimental Psychology study had 166 people to test. The experiment was to have the participants work on a challenging task while their phones start beeping and buzzing. The results showed that the worker became messier and had their attention elsewhere, whether or not they checked their phone. Dr. Adrian Ward is a psychologist and marketing professor at the University of Texas at Austin, he has been working with the effects of smart phones on our thoughts and decision making. Dr. Ward believes that we have grown so attached to our phones that they reduce our intelligence with their presence. To test this theory, Dr. Ward and three colleagues began a clever experiment to test his idea. They decided to enlist 520 undergraduate students at UCSD and make them perform two standard tests of intellectual acuity. The first test evaluated “available cognitive capacity”, it’s a test to measure how fully a person’s mind can focus on a single task. The second test gauged “fluid intelligence”, a person’s ability to understand and answer an unfamiliar problem. The only difference was the location of the student’s smart phone. Some students had their phone on the desk, while others had it in their bag or pocket. Others were even asked to leave their phone in a different room. The results of this test showed that “As the phone’s proximity increased, brainpower decreased” (pg.3).

The author also insinuates that modern-day society supports busyness and most Americans have inserted themselves into this pattern, “if only by our own acquiescence” (Kreider 983). The author argues that busyness “is something we collectively force one another to do” (Kreider

The computer is a work tool, organizer, a communication tool, and after we has been sitting on the computer for eight hours, most will probably still be able to read messages or private e-mails at home, or book the next trip. Some researchers see this as a change in people's attention span, as the oversupply of shorter texts, videos and graphics are preferred and more complex content is pushed into the background. Without the computer, it is no longer possible, and thanks to the development of more and more recent technology, such as the highly acclaimed smart devices, people and computers remain connected all day

We are just watering down the definition of multitasking. In my life many times we believe that we’re multitasking, but are we really mastering it. No! When I’m home listening to music, watching T.V. , and doing homework. Sure I’m multitasking, but am I mastering it. No, cause I really can’t listen to the lyrics of the song. I’m not paying close attention to the T.V. I have no clue what's going on. I’m also, not doing a good job on my homework. All this is because i’m distracted and not focus. Which means i’m not mastering multitasking. If I just really sat and focused on doing one thing at a time it will be so much better. If was just listening to music , I would know the lyrics of the song. If I was to focus just on the T.V. I would actually know what is going on. If I was to just do my homework and nothing else. I would be focusing and do my best on the assignment. So, yes I may be , multitasking ,but i'm not mastering it by any means. Also, in the classroom we did an experiment. In this experiment we split up into two groups. Group A went outside without any distractions. Group B stayed in the classroom with loud wacky music playing. Both groups were required to finish an easy quiz in a matter of a few minutes. After the time was up both groups gathered back in the classroom. And went over their quiz results group at the group without the distractions got more questions right by a landslide over group B.

The subject of substance abuse among college students is extremely relevant because substance abuse is often related to other maladaptive behaviors. Research indicates that individuals who engage in substance abuse are more likely to participate in risky behaviors such as engaging

Throughout the “A generation of Slackers” by Ronald Alsop he explains and analyzes today’s current societal issues of being able to focus while the consent distraction of the smartphone. This article completely hit the technology issue on the head in all places that is necessary. The article also pinpoints major issues surrounding the how the smartphone can play a role in avoiding people and procrastination in life.

Pop-up ads are constantly on every link, along with flashy signs and music to keep us from concentrating on the task. This ultimately leads to multitasking. We assume that we can handle all the information thrown at us together, but in reality it is too much. An experiment done by Thomas Buser and Noemi Petter involved three groups. The first group consisted of participants who worked on two tasks consecutively for twelve minutes each. The second group had to alter between these two tasks every four minutes for the same amount of time. Subjects in group three were not notified of how many switches were going to occur and for how long. The three group’s total time spent on each task was equal to prevent any lurking variables. The results of this experiment showed work schedules can be an important factor in productivity. The results emphasized that participants who focused on one task at a time, had a higher productivity rate than the subjects that tried to multitask. Machines can run several applications at one time while keeping one hundred percent concentration on each, precisely because it is a machine, people simply cannot. Carr agress that the internet has almost taken control over people. He says, “The Internet, an immeasurably powerful computing system, is subsuming most of our other intellectual technologies. It’s becoming our map and

Our information likewise firmly recommended that multitasking was essentially intercorrelated with unnecessary cell phone and Facebook utilization. All things considered, multitasking on cell phones does not appear to damage scholarly results for this gathering of undergrads. This discovering appears differently in relation to a prior study that discovered a negative relationship between Facebook use and math grades among African American and Hispanic adolescents (E. B. Lee, 2014). One of the astounding discoveries of the study concerns identity qualities. None of the identity qualities including extroversion, appropriateness, neuroticism, and honesty was a noteworthy indicator of cell phone and Facebook habit in the present examination, relating with finishes of Ross et al. (2009). The brief scales utilized (Mini-IPIP) might not have caught full measurement of the characteristics of this specific specimen. Restrictions and Implications for Future Research Although this exploratory study analyzed a vital theme and added new data to the developing group of examination, it was completed with a few impediments. To begin with, the accommodation inspecting utilized as a part of the study does not permit speculation of the outcomes to all inclusive community. Future exploration ought to be reached out to African American understudies

Abuse of drugs is high in college, and more often than not leads to severe costs. The Figure to the left shows different important facts when it comes to college substance abuse in the form of

Constantly using phones while at work decreases productivity drastically. Checking a phone for one or two minutes at a time, several times a day can amount to hours of precious work time being lost, thus decreasing productivity. According to an online article, “1 in 5 employers think that employees are productive fewer than 5 hours a day” in that same article, the author also stated “… 55% of employers say texting/cellphones is the biggest source of distractions” (Farber). This comes to shows that there is a growing problem of lack of productivity in the work force due to the constant use of cell phones. In a different article, the text stated, “ 3 quarters of employers say that two or more hours a day are lost in productivity because of distractions such as texting, the internet, social media, and email…” (Mirabella). Phones have just become a

The article focuses on the distraction of mobile devices in the college classroom. Brenner explains that they are distracting to not only the person using them, but the people around them as well. Through her research, she found that the people sitting next to multitaskers on their laptops tended to score lower on tests than those without the distraction. On that note, she states that people “are not wired to multi task”. Through a study, she found that texting during lectures caused a decrease in student’s ability to take notes, pay attention, and perform well on tests. She also found that the use of laptops