A Dog Park Benefits All Analysis

Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also

Dogs should have their own parks,because when dogs aren't getting the physical and mental excercise that they need, their behavior tend to get worse. ASPCA has a study that shows the rate of dogs biting humans went down drastically in places where they're dog parks. ASPCA also believes that if dogs had a park then their would be less incidents of dogs attacking humans,barking, and destroying things. Many dog owners have given their dogs up , because they started to act like''bad dogs'', this is because they don't have a dog park to excercise all their energy everyday. Dogs need a park just like humans.

Public dog parks have proven to improve the health of the animals, decrease dog-related attacks, and increase the population in the surrounding area of the dog park. While concerns over the comfort of the surrounding residents comes into question, many of those issues may be resolved with appropriate laws set into place. For these reasons, I believe builing a public dog park would be a positive addition to the

In the city of Muscatine, Iowa there is a debate going on. A debate on whether a dog park spanning over one acre of land should be built or not. It is very important for dogs to run and play for mutiple reasons. Resons such as to release all that extra energy they have aslo, excercise is shown to lower bad behavior in dogs, but this dog park is not a good idea.

Limiting a dog's physical activity can lead to many other problems such as dog-bite reports increasing, crowded dog shelters, and bad behaved dogs. Adding a dog park will only befenfit the growth of city in many aspects. Property values will increase and lawsuits should decrease, because dogs are proven to be more well behaved when active and social with one another.

I do believe it would be best for everyones sake if the dog park was built. Clearly, the passage stated in benefit to the dog park being built, "Bad behaior caused by dogs being lonely or poorly exercised is partly responsible for the 2 million pet dogs that end up at U.S. animal shelters every year." The prevention of putting an animal in a shelter could possibly avoid lawsuits from the animal attacking a person.

If you're going to own a pet, take into consideration the space needed and responsibilities at hand, especially a dog. Stated in the first "beneficial" dog park passage, it is said that dogs become aggressive and can cause more issues if they are kept indoors and don't get much exercise and fresh air. I do not disagree in the least bit, but creating a dog park in the middle of a place with lack of space with assumingly

I think that it is a great idea to build a dog park because just like that passage stated exercise is important to a dog's mental and physical health lack of exercise can also cause alot of health problems for dogs from the lack of being able to walk around for example dog obesity lack of fresh air and freedom also leads to dogs barking and destroying things in their owners home. another reason why a dog bark is a excellent idea because dogs need to socialize with other dogs and other humans beings because in some cases dogs will attack other humans and other animals from the lack of not knowing them. I think dog biting accidents would stop if dogs were giving the proper tools to release some energy and frustration. a dog park is also a

In my opinion I believe that their should be a dog park. Here are the reasons why. Dog parks will help the kids play in their regular parks, the dogs have right to have fun just like people can as well, dog parks can be helpful to train your dog. It will also prevent you from dog reports.

I believe having a dog park in the city is a wonderful idea, especially for people that live in apartments. There usually isn't anywhere for pet owners to take their dogs and let them get any exercise and roam free. Having a dog park would take care of all that. The dogs would be happy and so would their owners.The city would also benefit as well.

Public dog parks should be built in every city in the US. People with dog should know that a dog that is will exercise well be more friendly. In the passage its says that "dogs that dont get exercise can act out by barking and destroying things". this explains alot because you would want to walk in to your home with friends/family while your dog is destroying eveything. Now if the dog reguly exrcised the dog wouldnt do that at all.

Dog parks, in my opinion, should be a must. As said in the first article, some residences have restrictions on pets running loose. Where is the fun in that? Us as humans prefer to run loose and not be leashed up like a prisoner. So, why treat our pets any different?

A good dog is a tired dog. In the city of Muscatine, Iowa there are lots of dogs. Dogs that are in need of exercise, off leash training, and dog to dog interaction. A dog park would boost the property values in the community being a benefit to everyone. A off leash dog park would help the dogs mentaly as much as physicaly less proptery damage less in home barking disturbeing other residents in the apartment.

When more than half of all residents live in rental units it leaves dogs with no wear to release energy. In New York alone they saw a drop in dog bite reports by 36,000 a year. By building dog parks where dogs can run free you are making the city a more safe invorment.

I think the idea of a dog park being built is great. Owners can take their dogs to a safe place to run around an play. People are always looking for a dog park that is close by to go to. Plus property values will go up.