A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen

882 WordsJan 31, 20184 Pages
Through Nora and Helmer's exchange we discover that Krogstad, despite the fact that apparent as the miscreant in a doll's house, has an association with Nora and her past as they have both perpetrated the same wrongdoing in the public eye- to manufacture a mark. This shows the limited and good laws of pop culture, which restrain the characters in their movements, and makes a clash between what they see as ethically right restricted to overstepping the law. "I call him an ethical pariah". This is highlighted through Nora's misleading, as she gets cash and produces her father's signature out of adoration for her spouse and their lifestyle as she wishes to spare his life, despite the fact that it is illegal to do so. "The trip was to spare my spouses life-how would I be able to surrender it?" Her love for Helmer and good feeling of good and bad overrules her obligation to public opinion and laws. Helmer is connected with law and administers in the play, because of his position in the public arena as a previous legal counselor and financier, subsequently having experienced the problem between equity and bad form. However Helmer is likewise interfaced to the thought of law because of his status in their family public opinion. Where Helmer is the leader of the family and keeps up control over whatever remains of the family- permitting him to make and control laws which he forces on whatever is left of his family "no obtaining, no obligation". The incongruity of Nora's double

More about A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen

Open Document