A Force More Powerful, directed by Steve York Essays

The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non-violence to bring about change. This DBQ will look at two countries where a non-violent movement was successful.

In Mahatma Gandhi’s speech “On Nonviolent Resistance”, he spoke out against the South African government and urged his fellow people to join him in his peaceful protesting. Gandhi was a prominent figure in India’s fight for independence from South African rule. Gandhi was a firm believer in peace and though he was imprisoned many times, he encouraged his followers to remain nonviolent despite violent actions from those in power. The speech was given to Gandhi’s supporters to urge them to stay firm in their beliefs. Gandhi used comparisons and examples to show logic in his speech, he also used the beliefs of his fellows Indians to appeal to his followers' ethics and prove his credibility, he finally used paradoxes to add to the emotional element in his speech.

non-violent protests that caused the government to get into action as a result of failure of court

All through history governments and empires have been overthrown or defeated primarily by the violence of those who oppose them. This violence was usually successful however, there have been several situations, when violence failed, that protesters have had to turn to other methods. Non-violent protesting never seemed to be the right course of action until the ideology of Mohandas Gandhi spread and influenced successful protests across the world. Non-violent methods were successfully used, most notably, by Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela.

When we think of iconic civil rights activists we think of Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and Rosa parks as the list goes on and on. Each of these individuals strived for justice and equality in seemingly unjust societies. Now, each civil activist had their own way of handling their own prejudice-filled cultures. For even to this day we ask ourselves, “What is the right way to protest and exhibit change?”. Throughout history there have been countless demonstrations in protest or by simply standing for what an individual believes in. For The two activists that stand out from those forementioned for the means of this paper is whether Gandhi and his nonviolent approach to discrimination or Malcolm X who promoted the ideal of “By any means necessary” in his civil protests have ideals that can be used in societies

While when discussing the history of the world’s power forces, violence makes for stimulating discussion, other tactics were put to good use, one of these alternatives being non-violence. With the guidance of three worldwide heroes - Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela - with contagious optimism and high spirits, it became apparent just how much of a difference could be made carried out through non-violent terms. Mankind was introduced to another way to resolve major problems just as effectively, if not more, than violence could.

Scholars have long debated the most effective approach to analyzing comparative politics. In “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method”, Arend Lijphart, perceives a problem viz., the low ebb of “explicit methodological concern and the implicit methodological awareness among students of comparative politics”(681). To address this problem Lijphart sets forth a systematic approach to political analysis, advocating for the greater use of the comparative method as the tool for political inquiry. Lijphart delineates the strengths and weaknesses of the comparative, experimental, statistical, and case study methods. By analyzing each method in relative terms to each other Lijphart highlights when to use and how to maximize the use of each method while designating the comparative method as the most effective approach. However, it is impossible to actually determine which method is the best - just because a method is easier to perform than the others doesn’t mean it’s the most accurate. Nevertheless, the comparative method should not be ignored, as it is an important tool of political analysis.

The history of American, non violent, civil disobedience depicts how peaceful resistance can shape public opinion, voice dissent, and change unjust laws. In both Contemporary and past history do we see the role that protest has on our Democracy,and how dissenters, such as Susan B Anthony and Martin Luther King Jr, can become American heroes. The United States was founded on an act of civil disobedience, and even in Modern America, principled dissent has become the highest form of

The Civil Rights Movement, led by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., played a massive role in American history and it did so not through a revolution of savagery, but one of peace. The right to peaceably assemble for change has always been a staple in American society, defined as a right in the first amendment to the Constitution, ensuring that everyone could protest and call for peaceful action without being persecuted by the government. In 1978, Cesar Chavez wrote an article addressing the usefulness of “nonviolent resistance,” especially referring to Dr. King’s Civil Rights Movement. His usage of juxtaposition, logical fallacies, and unifying diction assist in Chavez’s attempt to drive the point that nonviolent resistance is the greatest way to

Cesar Chavez, published an article explaining ways nonviolent resistance has a greater effect than violent resistance. In this article Chavez aims to validate that nonviolent resistance more effective than using violent options. Throughout the article he uses different type of rhetorical choices. Two of the choices he decided to use was an ethical appeal and emotional appeal. He adopts a motivational tone in order to aid a conveying the message to his adult or young adult audience.

The Oxford Dictionary defines politics as the activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power. Comparative politics is the interdisciplinary study of how power is organized across time and space. It connects the operation of power across multiple time and spatial scales and identifies the similarities and differences of how power operates across space and time.

The idea of civil disobedience is one that has fascinated human beings and American culture specifically for generations. The idea of brave men and women going beyond the bounds of the law to fight whatever injustice stands in their path is one that has been frequently romanticized. However, today many are beginning to become disillusioned with the idea of civil disobedience, questioning whether or not today’s social activists are capable of any real change, as many issues such as widespread poverty or race relations seem to go unredressed. The distinction between the political protests in history that are idealized and those seen today which seem relatively ineffective is simply the ability to communicate. Movements that effectively communicate

Then I moved into looking at specific ways people resisted in that time, particularly in the Nazi regime, by reading Sharon B. Brysac’s 2000 New York Times article, “At last, recognition and praise for the resistance in Nazi Germany” and Lester Kurtz’s 2010 essay, published by the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, “The anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa (1912-1992).” In all that reading, I began to develop some curiosity about how and where nonviolent resistance is working in today’s world, so I read M.J. Stephan and E. Chenoweth’s 2008 article, published by the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, “Why civil resistance works,” and Steven Harper’s 2017 article, published by Moyers & Company, “The Trump resistance plan: Step 1 -- understanding the three D’s.” I read David Frum’s 2017 article, “How to build an autocracy,” published in The Atlantic, to understand similarities political scientists are noticing between some of the rising governments and historic autocracies. Finally, I wanted to explore ways some science fiction writers have imagined our futures, if we fail to resist authoritarian governments, so I watched the 2006 film Children of men, directed by A. Cuaron, and I read the 2000 novel Parable of the sower, by Octavia F. Butler. It was only in viewing and reading science fiction that I began to understand: the point of nonviolent resistance is not to win everything today (although of course that

Non- violent movements are a way for groups of people to achieve change and create an impact in the society. The labor, African American, and Vietnam anti-war peace movements were significantly successful in abolishing harsh working conditions, gaining civil rights for blacks, and withdrawing from the Vietnam War (Upchurch). Non-violent and violent movements have been used throughout history to evoke change in the society, obtain equality, civil rights, and peace. While violent protest result in the same changes, non-violent methods can ultimately go beyond local violent protest, spread nationally through movements, and protest without requiring violence. These events because of the non-violent

"Violent Protests are an Effective Tool to Achieve Social Change" written by Marco Palma. (2016, December 12). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from http://narratorjournal.com/content/2016/12/12/violent-protests-are-an-effective-tool-to-achieve-social-change-written-by-marco-palma