A Hypothesis Without Conducting Background Research

2. There are many conditions with symptoms similar to those described in the story. Research the symptoms. What bacteria or pathogens, other than E. coli, might be responsible for these illnesses? What are some examples of other ilnesses that can have similar symptoms?

6. Why would evidence of cholera in people living side by side, differing only in water supply, provide critical evidence?

James should then begin to make food choice changes and portion control, for example cutting out fatty foods and consuming large portions of food. It states in the case study that he does not pay attention to his diet and because he works long hours, he often skips meals and that he is not good at cooking. James will have to now pay a lot of attention to his diet because it is putting him at risk of serious health problems and the first thing he should do is look on the internet for food recipes. If James does not want to cook at all, he should order

Epistemological Foundationalism essentially claims that some empirical beliefs carry justification that does not require, or depend, on the justification of other empirical beliefs. In this essay, I intend to introduce the reading, “Can Empirical knowledge Have A foundation?” Written by Laurence Bonjour, to give a detailed summary of his arguments - as well as those who object to his - and ultimately to assert my belief that there is currently no example of an empirical belief that of which can be justified in an epistemic sense without avoiding reference to other empirical beliefs, which would then have to be justified themselves, not solving the regress problem.

“The developed world deprives children of a basic and inalienable right: unstructured outdoor play. Children today have substantially less access to nature, less free range, and less time for independent play than previous generations had.” This quote is from the research based paper titled, “Where the Wild Things Should Be: Healing Nature Deficit Disorder through the Schoolyard." This article touches many aspects of how children now a days need more exposure to nature like it was on the older days. Currently, there are many playgrounds around the United States and even more the world. This article is trying to bring awareness to the problem of if playgrounds do not have enough nature or is too safe then it is

One important detail from the investigation was that all the men had eaten oatmeal at the Eclipse Cafeteria on the same day and they all had the same illness shortly after eating. Since they all became ill after eating at the cafeteria, it was reasonable to consider the cafeteria as the source of the disease. Additionally, the fact that they all had the same illness supports the fact that a common factor (i.e., eating oatmeal at the Eclipse Cafeteria) caused the illness. Commonalities are important because they can help narrow down possible illnesses and they can help pinpoint the source, which in this case was poisoning from sodium

There were three hypotheses of the experiment. The first was, “we expect that demographic factors will predict the importance of taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control to individual persons”. This means that they (the scientist involved) believed that the personal characteristics (age, gender, income, and race) will affect the flavor of food, benefits

The topic of valuation of early-stage companies, patents, and technologies have been a topic of study since the late 1980’s. Since the work published by Amit et al (1990) a body of management science literature was published around the value relevance of non-financial information that quantifies the human capital of the founding team. Amit et al posit that

Throughout this course I have learned many things about research at an introductory level. Research is a critical part of all of our lives in many ways. God blesses each of us with a degree of common sense and we all learn from observing others even as babies, we learned behaviors and skills by observing our parents. Walking through experiences throughout life teach us a lot we need to know as well but sometimes we have to take a better approach when we need to learn about certain things. Many of us know that what works in some situations or with certain individuals doesn’t always work or is the safest option for another situation. Controlled and precisely organized study allows scientists to compare and examine contrasting methods and concepts, also helps them to discover various approaches and be able to learn from individual’s behaviors and experiences. I will act as the case study throughout this paper in order to observe what I have learned about.

There are a variety of topics that are interesting in life. This interest may then become a point of inquisition, where an individual may formulate a relationship between two variables, which may or may not influence each other. Next, a hypothesis is formed and tested. In this same manner, a school educator was interested in determining the potential relationship between grade point average (GPA) and IQ scores among ninth graders. The educator random sampled 30 ninth graders, ages 14 years old and administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). This writer will be expanding further on this topic and will formulate the null and alternative hypothesis, describe the four scales of measurement, describe whether if there is a correlation significant (positive, negative, or no correlation) enough between both variables, describe the strength of the relationship, describe what the results reveals about the hypothesis, and what conclusions can be drawn from the results.

In 8th grade there were 20 scientists who was trying to figure out the mysterious mixture of chemicals. At first there were nine chemicals total. Now they have narrowed it from nine to 2. All 8th graders think it has baking soda in it. Half of the class is in disagreement with the other 1/2 . Half of the class thought it was Baking soda, and Citric Acid. The other half thought it was Baking soda and Vitamin C. The data going to be presented with help you understand why half of the class thinks it baking soda and citric acid, and why they don’t think it’s baking soda and citric acid.

Secondly, food- testing is a procedure required for food safety. Food- borne illness can be a serious public health hazard. For this reason, some kitchen workers are required by law to have knowledge of food safety procedures. Food-testing procedures should follow clear methodologies that can be reproduced under similar circumstances. When testing the flavor of a food with a focus group, methodology might involve blind taste testing, and then asking test subjects to evaluate the food's flavor on a numerical scale (Gartenstein, 2010, para.7). As for food-borne pathogens, it might involve culturing and counting the number of microorganisms present in a

OF the three persons- Picket, Bennett, and Reinhardt- who was most likely to have been infected during the picnic outbreak? Who was most likely to have been infected before the picnic? Going by the facts for typhoid disease from Merck, stools are positive during the 3rd to 5th week, therefore Irene Picket and Kenneth Rinehart should have been infected before the picnic and Margaret Benet at the picnic. Her stools were positive after the 3rd to 5th week time period for the picnic.

The results of these tests aided in the determination of the restaurant most likely to have induced the poisoning.

The meaning of problem statement in an investigation varies according to different sources. Bryman (2007) states that a problem statement is a clear statement about the topic of interest, a condition that can be improved, an obstacle to be removed, or a problematic theoretical question that is present in scholarly literature. It may also be present in existing fields that has a need for more comprehensive understanding and research. A problem statement does not state the method of doing something, offer generalised proposition, or provide a value question. It serves several purposes, the first is introducing the reader to the importance of the topic being researched on. Secondly, it ensures that the topic is placed into a particular or narrowed context that defines the parameters of the research topic. Thirdly, it serves to provide a framework for the researcher to report the result and shows the probable requirements needed to conduct the study and provide explanation on how the findings