In “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, Mr. Peters, a small town sheriff, looks into an interesting case: the murder of Mr. Wright. Joining him are his wife, Mrs. Peters, and Mrs. Hale, a once close friend to Minnie Foster, currently known as Mrs. Wright. Once Mr. Peters is in the house he struggles to find any clues that suggest who the killer is and his or her motives, but the two women do. They find significant evidence that leads them to assume that Mrs. Wright is the killer. Although Mrs. Wright claims to have been asleep during her husband's murder, the women conclude she strangled her husband, Mr. Wright, as evidenced by the broken birdcage, the slaughtered canary, and the errant quilt patch.
First Mrs. Peters discovers something interesting about a birdcage. She says “Look at the door...It's broken. One hinge has been pulled apart” (Glaspell).
…show more content…
Mrs. Peters notices that Mrs. Wright was piecing a quilt. Both see that the craftsmanship of the quilt is declining. One minute Most of the patches are neat and tidy and then “as if she didn’t know what she was about!” (Glaspell) they get untidy and the thread taut as if it might snap any minute. Again both ladies eyes met, which is an ongoing pattern in the story that symbolizes when they fully understand. The errant quilt patches lead the women to a clear killer because they have full evidence that shows that Minnie was distraught over the killing of her bird and finished with the abusive treatment from her husband that eventually drives her mad and we see that through the quilt. Minnie had decided when quilting how she was going to kill him by tying a knot around his neck. The two women know this verdict, yet continue to ignore it. Mrs. Hale actually starts to fix the odd patches. They give excuses for the bad quilting so that they can protect Minnie. Mrs. Hale keeps a calm demeanor and insists that Minnie was maybe just
In Susan Glaspell's “ A Jury Of Her Peers” Mrs. Wright’s husband is found strangled in their bed and Mrs. Wright is in the living room calm but in the same way concerned, claiming she “sleeps sound” and didn’t wake up or hear anyone in their house that night. Mrs. Hale a lifetime friend of Mrs. Wright compares her to the canary saying “She was like a bird herself. Real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and-fluttery.” Although Mrs. Wright does not initially appear capable of murder, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale concluded Mrs. Wright strangled her husband as evidence by the crazily sewn quilt patch, the unhinged bird cage, and the mutilated canary.
“Somehow, we just don’t see how it is with other folks till, something like this happens.” (page 15) So Mrs. Hale suggests she take in the quilt to help ease the mind of Mrs. Wright. As the ladies are searching for the rest of Mrs. Wright’s sewing items they locate a nice box in which they thought were her items. After noticing it was not the rest of her items and they may have just found the motive to the unexplained murder.
First, looking around the kitchen, the women notice that Minnie had left a lot of things “half done.” There was a table with “one half… wiped clean, the other half messy,” and a bucket of sugar half-filled. Minnie must have kept getting interrupted from her work. Maybe it was her husband or maybe it was her own thinking. The women know that to leave something unfinished it must have been something very importimportantnt. The second piece of evidence the women find is the log cabin quilt that Minnie had been working on. All of the quilt squares are sewn “nice and even”, except for one. The square looks as if Minnie “didn’t know what she was about.” It seems as if Minnie was nervous while sewing it. The women find it weird that Minnie was so careless on that square, when she was so meticulous in sewing the others. The final, and possibly most important, piece of evidence is the dead bird that the women found in Minnie’s sewing basket. Mr. Hale, we assume, “wrung its neck,” and it was something that Minnie really cared about. Mrs. Peters remembers a time when, “ there was a boy (who) took a hatchet,” to her kitten. She knows what it feels like to want to hurt someone who hurt something you care about. In the end, the women decide to hide the evidence from the men. Susan Glaspell’s use of logos is
Mrs.Wright claims she was laying sound asleep, even as her husband lying next to her was being strangled to death by a rope. As you may conclude this story she has made up does not sound plausible due to the evidence against her. Now to find her motive for killing Mr.Wright. There are major clues throughout the text that help to find Mrs.Wright’s motive as evidenced by the mangled bird cage and the slaughtered canary.
In the short story "A Jury of Her Peers" a woman named Minnie Wright is accused of the murder of her husband. Minnie Wright is a farmer's wife and is also isolated from the out side world. There is an investigation that takes place in the home of the murder. There are three men that are involved on the case and two women accompany, but are not there to really help solve the murder. These two women will
One critic, Leonard Mustazza, argues that Mrs. Hale recruits Mrs. Peters “as a fellow ‘juror’ in the case, moving the sheriff’s wife away from her sympathy for her husband’s position and towards identification with the accused woman” (494). Though this is true, Mrs. Peters also comes to her own understanding. What she sees in the kitchen led her to understand Minnie’s lonely plight as the wife of an abusive farmer. The first evidence Mrs. Peters reaches understanding on her own surfaces in the following passage: “The sheriff’s wife had looked from the stove to the sink to the pail of water which had been
The reasons behind Mr. Wright’s demise are obscure, till clues unveil a home environment in which may be considerably enough for such action. The audience is introduced to Mrs. Wright’s situation according to the recollection of her neighboring farmer Lewis Hale, his wife Mrs. Hale, the sheriff and his wife Mrs. Peters as Mrs. Wright has already been taken into custody in suspicion this murder. Mrs. Hale tell the county attorney that the home “never seemed like a cheerful place” as well as telling Mrs. Peters that “he was a hard man”. Implying that this may very well have been a broken home, this followed by another exchange the will point in the speculated domestic abuse. Mrs. Peters discovers a bird-cage that had been placed in a cupboard, only to find Mrs. Wright’s bird to which the cage had belonged.
The women empower themselves through silence, particularly in the kitchen communicating and reflecting upon things around them in the limited space they were given. The men dismiss the kitchen finding nothing that is relevant to the murder case. The men keep crisscrossing through the kitchen, ignoring and not realizing they could find the vital evidence through trivial details. Even though they were having difficulty in finding clues that lead to the murder. While the women were alone looking through Minnie’s kitchen they found the most valuable evidence the “missing piece to men’s puzzle” (Holstein 283). Mrs. Hale found the dead bird strangled in the sewing box telling “Mrs. Peters-look at it! Its neck! Look at its neck!” (782). Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters recognize the bird was strangled brutally “their eyes meet. A look of growing comprehension, of horror” (Glaspell 782). Both of them realized the bird was killed the same way as Mr. Wright with the rope around their neck. The strangled bird represents Minnie Foster how her freedom and joy was strangled to death. When the men came in the kitchen, the county attorney noticed the bird cage, wondering if the bird flew away, but Mrs. Hale lied and said “we think the- cat got it” ( Glaspell 782). The county attorney seek only visible evidence for murder he was wasn’t thinking critically what it may mean. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters covered the evidence keeping it between themselves for their own knowledge. They
The men were still looking for evidence, but women are replaying the scene of murder in there minds. They conclude that Mrs. Wright was sewing in kitchen, when Mr. Wright came into the kitchen and saw the bird. This explains why Mrs. Wright was sewing nervously. I assumed that Mr. Wright didn’t like birds, because they are very noisy referring to conversation with Mr. Hale about the joining party phone line. Mr. Wright must have seen the birdcage with the bird. He must have broken the birdcage and broke the bird’s neck. This was enough of a motive need for Mrs. Wright to kill her husband. The
“A Jury of Her Peers” is a short story written by Susan Glaspell in 1917 illustrates early feminist literature. The two female characters, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, is able to solve the mystery of who the murderer of John Wright while their male counterparts could not. This short story had been adapted from Glaspell’s one-act play Trifles written the previous year. The play consists of the same characters and plotline as the story. In both works, Glaspell depicts how the men, Sheriff Peters and Mr. Hale, disregard the most important area in the house, the kitchen, when it comes to their investigation. In the end, the women are the ones who find clues that lead to the conclusion of Minnie Wright, John Wright’s wife, is the one who murdered him. Both of Glaspell’s female characters illustrate the ability to step into a male dominated profession by taking on the role of detective. According to Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide, written by Lois Tyson, a reader-response critique “focuses on readers’ response to literary texts” and it’s a diverse area (169). Through a reader-response criticism from a feminist lens, we are able to analyze how “A Jury of Her Peers” and Trifles depict how a patriarchal society oppresses women in the early twentieth century, gender stereotypes confined both men and women and the emergence of the New Woman is illustrated.
In “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, Minnie Foster Wright is the main character, even though the reader never sees Mrs. Wright. The story begins as Mrs. Hale joins the county attorney, Mr. Henderson; the sheriff, Mr. Peters; Mrs. Peters; and her husband in a “big two-seated buggy” (188). The team men are headed the Wright house to investigate Mr. Wright’s murder. Mrs. Peters is going along to gather some belongings for Mrs. Wright, who is currently being held in jail, and Mrs. Hale has been asked to accompany Mrs. Peters. As the investigation is conducted throughout the story, the reader is given a sense of how women were treated during this time and insight into why the women ultimately keep evidence from the men.
The quilt is one major clue as to how Minnie killed her husband. The women were trying to figure out if she was going to sew or not the quilt. Well, Mr. Wright was strangled in a strange manner, just how the knot was messed up in red string. The men laughed it off butt Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters knew what had happened.
Even so, the domestic system the men have set up for their wives and their disregard for them after the rules and boundaries have been laid down prove to be the men's downfall. The evidence that Mrs. Wright killed her husband is woven into Mrs. Hale's and Mrs. Peters's conversations about Mrs. Wright's sawing and her pet bird. The knots in her quilt match those in the rope used to strangle Mr. Wright, and the bird, the last symbol of Mrs. Wright's vitality to be taken by her husband, is found dead. Unable to play the role of subservient wife anymore, Mrs. Wright is foreign to herself and therefore lives a lie. As Mrs. Hale proclaims, "It looks as if she didn't know what she was about!" (1177).
The climax of the play unfolds as the women find an empty birdcage with a broken hinge. As the two women speculate why it was empty, Mrs. Hale describes Mrs. Wright to Mrs. Peters as she knew her when they were single women. The suspect's maiden name was Minnie Foster. She was a beautiful songstress. A voice that was muted when she became Mrs. Wright.