A Leave For A College Essay

The electoral college has a major corruption through the fact that each vote is represented by a different percentage of a state’s population. Wyoming has one vote for every 187,875 citizens, while California has one vote for every 677, 345 citizens.(Document 2). This turns away any constant in the amount of voters

The electoral vote allotment is based on the population of each state, collected from the census. This method of division leads to severe imbalances between the decisions of small states and the decisions of the larger states. In 2010, Alaska, Delaware, DC, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming had a total amount of 44 electoral votes. Illinois, a single state, had 20. This means that one sole state had as many electoral votes as six states put together. While the electoral system is usually unfair to smaller states, in the case of ties, the larger states suffer the most. When the electoral vote is tied, each state can only cast one vote for the final decision, meaning that a “representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters,” according to Bradford Plumer, author of the article “The Indefensible Electoral College.” No matter what happens during the election, one group is always being cheated out of their rightful votes. The choice of our country’s leader should not be based on a system that is unfair to a specific group of voters simply due to their state

But the result of the Electoral College today is to give too much power to the small states. In fact, they have more power than the largest states in the union. For instance, California's population (the largest) is approximately 70 times that of Wyoming's (the smallest). But California only has about 18 times the Electoral College votes (55 to 3) (Raasch 1). According to writer Chuck Raasch, that means a vote in Wyoming has potentially four times the impact in the Electoral College (1). Also, in 1988, the combined voting age population (3,119,000) of the seven least populous states (Alaska, Delaware, D.C., North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming) had the same number of Electoral votes (21) as the 9,614,000 voters in Florida (Kimberling 1).

Not only can the popular vote be ignored in winner-take-all states but in small states like Wyoming and Vermont that only get 3 votes, whereas California gets 55. Which is exactly what framers from small states were worried about, their voices being drowned out by larger states. Candidates on the campaign trail would probably not waste money going to small states where their votes won’t really sway the election either way. This subconsciously shows that they don’t care about the people who live there or what they think. Also, certain states are very underrepresented such as California, Texas, New York and Florida. Underrepresentation happens when the share of population outweighs the share of electorate seats. At the same time, how can we definitely say that ten people can represent the votes 6 million people in

In the “Point: Abolishing the Electoral College,” Benjamin Bolinger, a licensed lawyer who can practice law in Colorado and Pennsylvania, argues that the Electoral College needs to be abolished for the American democracy. Bolinger examines that some states with a little population have large number of electoral college compare to those states with larger populations. He believes that the Electoral College damages the value of democratic government by leaving

This occurs because of the extreme difference of population between the two states, with Wyoming only having one-hundred and ninety-five citizens while California has roughly thirty-nine million. Through the electoral college a vote is worth more purely based off location, and due to the existence of swing states this distortion is even greater. A microcosm of this event can be seen in a majority of cities, with are primarily made of non-whites. And because the nation's population is growing, with city growth being much more rapid than suburban and rural growth, the urban vote will carry less weight in the Electoral college system than the smaller less populated

As stated earlier, the electoral votes each state has is equal to the amount of seats in the Senate, plus the number of the seats they have in the House of Representatives. While each state has two Senate seats, House seats are distributed by the population size of the state. Due to this, the average vote of a person in California is worth much more than the average vote of a person in Wisconsin. This dilemma causes people in smaller states to feel as if they do not have a strong hand in the election. Furthermore, the fact that presidential candidates are able to visualize this inequality causes them to neglect smaller states during election season.

Although that is true, today is a different time period than the Founding Father. The Electoral College solved problems that were relevant back then, such as communication difficulties and accounting for slaves. Those problems have been resolved today with other means, such as technology and abolishing slavery. Although giving smaller states a louder voice is favorable, it is becoming overly skewed. For example, a vote in Wyoming is almost “312 times as much mathematically” worth more than a vote in Ohio (Borenstein 2). A vote with this much power can easily takeover votes with not as much power, which can result in the election not delivering true democratic results. The Electoral College may seem like it is helpful by maintaining the principles of the Founding Fathers and accounting for smaller states, but it is actually more detrimental than

In terms of allocating electors to states, "each state is allocated a number of electors equal to the number of its US Senators (always 2) plus the number of its US Representatives (which may change each decade according to the size of each state's population as determined in the Census)" (Kimberling 1992:10). However, the Electoral College is controversial and widely regarded as outdated by many. Firstly, it seems to give unfair sway to states with large amounts of electors, based upon population. It is unfair that the vote of a resident of Wyoming should have less weight than that of a vote in New York, simply because New York is more densely-populated than Wyoming.

A fork in the road only appears as such when both paths are seen as viable options; yet, once one path becomes seen as the only one, the other devolves into a deviation. Where the aberration would require justification to travel down, the perceived correct course would require justification to not travel down. This is precisely how the false question of attending college was presented to me: it was a matter of when not if. Upon inheriting white looking skin, a middle class family, and a pat on the back for bringing home white sheets of papers with little red “A”s written in the top right corner, it was ascertained that I was to be a productive and successful engineer after paying for college with hard-won scholarship money. In short, there were several socio-economic factors that contributed to my eventual position in college.

Fall break 2012 the beginning of my 7th grade year, I had to pack my room and leave the school I had gone to for the past 3 years. I was terrified of leaving the house I had grown fond of and the school I had gotten used to. Little did I know I would appreciate this move more than ever. I soon learned that sometimes moving means better places and people, school wise I had better opportunities and the bullying had stopped. It was probably one of the best experiences I had experienced even if I didn’t realize that at the time.

I received the prompt challenging me to compare a piece of art in the exhibit to my transition into college. When trying to make a connection to my shift into college I was most drawn to the Andy Warhol, Warhol by the Book, collection in particular the piece based on Truman Capote. This piece depicts Capote in side by side pictures with the only contrast being his hat. I found this relatable to the transition into college because of this changing of hats. When making this change I have tried to kept the belief in staying true to oneself and not letting the environment shape you. College is a different world with different expectations making your hat change, however your hat should not change you.

This obviously causes critical overrepresentation of little states in the “College.” In the most extreme case, using 2010 Census figures and the new distribution of House seats based on that census, an individual resident in Wyoming has more than triple the weight in electoral votes as a person in California. To be honest it is closer to quadruple than triple. Now how can this possibly be a good

During spring break, EMMA is sent away to live with her grandmother, who lives in a rural countryside. Even though her parents tell her that they used to visit her grandmother when she is a kid, Emma can remember none of those memories.

“Every vote counts!”But a vote can easily be more valuable in one state than another state. “There are many Democrats in red states, and as many Republicans in blue states, and plenty of Independent voters who are not readily identified with either party. The focus on blue states and red states has removed the nuanced political affiliations that characterize the United States..”(Rich and Newton). The majority of the votes in the state get’s all of the state’s electoral votes. That makes many republican votes in blue states forgotten, and irrellevant. That’s not always the case, some are counted more than others. Votes shouldn’t be more valuable in one state than in another state. Consider this example:“Wyoming, the least populous state, has one representative for every 510,000