A Lie Is Not Moral Or Ethical Value

1004 Words5 Pages
It is never okay to lie to someone. Lying is disrespectful. I believe, the purpose to a lie is achieving a goal at the expense of another. It holds no moral or ethical value. Human beings are entitled to be respect by others. A philosopher known as Immanuel Kant who established two rules called as categorical imperative under the deontology theory (Kant, 2008). Deontology is the obligation or duty to act (Mosser, 2013). The rules in categorical imperative are one should act in a way that maxims resulting in action being a universal law and act with respect (an action of humanity resulting as people being equals in an end not as means to an end). Therefore, lying is wrong. It is misleading to people with false information…show more content…
People do not develop good ethics or morality based on the foundation to lies. The act of goodwill is good in itself (Kant, 2008). Again, a lie holds no moral or ethical value. Morality is identifying good or bad and right or wrong (Mosser, 2013). Therefore, the false information from a lie misleads and misguides moral reasons and logic in human behavior (Kant, 2008). I feel that Immanuel Kant would say that lying is considered moral incorrect because the act would not be accepted as a universal rule and the treatment to the act places others a means to an ends based on the duty or obligation of people with regard to the term goodwill. Immanuel Kant would argue that the purposes of acts are unconditional purpose of producing goodwill and the conditional purpose of being happy (Kant, 2008). Immanuel Kant would see that telling the truth is cultivating reasons that brings happiness from practical good will (Kant, 2008). However, a question rises to the thoughts of the “duty to make false promises.” My perspective in a false promises is poor morality and ethical values. A false promise is a lie. It falls out of the scope to Immanuel Kant rules and other ethical theories. Lies are a creator of instability and uncertainty in reason (Kant, 2008) . It should be rejected because it is harmful to other’s goodwill and the nature of own good will (Kant, 2008). However, there is no universal standard that requires the
Open Document