A Model For Computer Systems Research

A single system research design (SSRD) allows for the practitioner to study an individual, family or program. Single system research design is convenient, brief and cost efficient for the practitioner(s); SSRD interventions can be tested and assist in identifying their effectiveness on the patient (Royse, et al., 2010). SSRD has a risk of bias, from both the practitioner and the patient and the information gathered is not for generalizability, because it is only observing an individual. SSRD has little external validity, but allows the practitioner to observe in individual’s response to the intervention and monitor a trend for subsequent studies (Royse, et al., 2010). The patient involved in this research study is a 40 year-old Latina female. Her primary care physician referred her to behavioral health, when she demonstrated physical symptoms of fatigue, sleeplessness and numbness in her arm, inability to concentrate and feelings of sadness. Once, all medical illnesses were ruled out, the physician, working at an integrative care clinic, referred the patient to the LCSW on staff. In her first session the patient stated that she has demonstrating these symptoms for a month or so. She states that she did not know what is happening to her but she knew she had to see her doctor.The patient described that she has been living in Arlington for about 16 years. She is originally from Mexico and is married with four children. She states that lately she has been having some issues with

The world as we know it has changed drastically in the past three decades, we are slowly but surely morphing into a worldwide community dependent upon computer technology. More specifically we rely on the Internet heavily for everything in our day to day lives. The benefits of expediency and the convenience afforded to those who utilize information systems their business dynamics is undeniable.

Hitherto, over millions of articles and paper about research have been published into journal annually. In order for a paper to get published or an article to be documented, researchers tend to present their research findings and results to journal. They further sends the paper out to be assessed based on competency, implication, and originality through autonomous qualified experts who are conducting research and publishing work on the same field. This results must be reviewed by peers in order to attain credibility. This paper identifies a number of sources that clarify the connection between credibility and peer review.

I hope this email finds you well! I am a student in your Computer Science 101 lecture (section 001). As the semester is coming to a close I have been thinking about my future in Computer Science (I am currently enrolled in CS201 next semester). Coming into Duke as an athlete, my advisors were hesitant to let me take Computer Science as they thought 1) I wasn’t smart enough and 2) did not have enough time; I had no experience with computer science, but convinced them to let me take it. As I have taken your course, I have grown to love computer science. The idea of being able to intertwine scientific/mathmaatcic principles with personal creativity is so appealing to me. Ideally, I would like to pursue a minor (or even major?) in computer science;

A system interdependent on groups of people or items working together to complete a specific goal is known as an open system (Cordan, 2013). Healthcare organizations are usually designed around systems that interact with outside environments, indicating that they are open systems (Cordan, 2013). The purpose of this paper is to use a systems theory model to examine a workflow problem within an open system unit, in one organization, and design a solution to the workflow issue.

Standards rely heavily on the network effect, which is the idea that the effectiveness of a standard is based on the number of people who use it. As a result, standards that are complicated to implement, especially ones dealing with technology, are heavily dependent on incentives in order to get a sufficient amount of people to use it. Looking at PICS and PCI DSS, two Internet standards, where one succeeded and the other failed, we can see what makes standards effective online.

Since the invention of the world wide web in 1989 by Tim Berners-Lee, the global spread of information has become increasingly easy, as more resources become available online. The internet can be a useful tool in research and a great way to accumulate valuable information and knowledge, and can be a medium used to spark intelligent and meaningful discussions, but only if used correctly. Poor navigation of the surplus of content available online can lead to a sinkhole of inaccurate and, frankly, bullshit sources. Attempts at academic communication via online sources can devolve into echo rooms or mindless, childish retorts.

This paper appears in the publication, Journal of Cases on Information Technology, Volume 11, Issue 2 edited by Mehdi Khosrow-Pour © 2009, IGI Global

The approval committee generally serves as the decision making body regarding investments in information systems projects. This committee generally has a broad organizational representation, and therefore can avoid allocating resources that will serve only narrow organizational interests. The approval committee commonly has project oversight responsibilities as well as monitoring project performance

In the computer and technology book “The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It”, the author Jonathan L. Zittrain (2008, April 20) wants to alarm us that the internet world which we think is totally open and ruled by the users all over the world is actually controlled by some particular big companies and institutions. The openness and creativity of the Internet is a double-edged sword. Under the cover of a bloomed and wonderful development, today’s environment of the Internet is in danger. He suggests that more efficient methods and stricter requirements should be carried out to standardize the industry of the Internet.

The creation of the internet has not only spread academic information worldwide, but has promoted it as a result. In many ways, centers of knowledge that we recognize such as universities and research organizations rely upon the backbone of internet to be able to gather and put out their findings to the public. In addition to this, the internet allows these groups to release their knowledge faster than ever before as Fonseca argues. With the click of a button, billions of people can gain access to documents, images, and videos instantly. In most cases, one is able to track down the origin and publishers of information, so claims can be verified to be from peer review or respected institutions. Not only is this knowledge readily available, but it is usually provided for free, so that anyone with wifi can view their

Scholarly communication, especially in the digital environment, has witnessed a significant growth in the scientific productivity in all academic disciplines. According to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2011), approximately three million manuscripts are submitted to journals every year. As of 3 September 2014, the multidisciplinary coverage of the Web of Science encompasses over 50,000 scholarly books, 12,000 journals and 160,000 conference proceeding (Thomson Reuter, 2015). In fact, scholarly communication is seen as a crucial part of research, and researchers are often judged by their academic productivity. Any academic promotion is not only taking into its consideration the number of publications, but also how prestigious the journals they were published in. Such a case is based on the practice and process of the peer review implemented and the communication system followed between the author and the editorial staff. The most important characteristic of any academic or scholarly article is that it has to pass an academic quality

A. To succeed in today’s environment, it is often necessary to change business models and strategies.

1. Should not try to access system areas for which they do not have authorization.

In the early years of computer and network research and development many systems were designed by a number of companies. Although each system had its rights and were sold across the world, it became apparent as network usage grew, that it was difficult, to enable all of these systems to communicate with each other.