A Myth Of A Christian Nation Analysis

Peter Wehner’s article, “What Wouldn't Jesus Do?” highlights the peculiar political climate of the 2016 election, as some of the most despised candidates to have ever run for presidency campaign. Wehner writes this article in an attempt to persuade those who are Christian (specifically Evangelical) to not support the candidate Donald Trump and gives reason through both fact and opinion. While some of the arguments are valid, Wehner writes an overly one-sided piece. He provides few facts and bases all of his claims off his own thoughts and opinions, leading to an extremely biased article that lacks consideration and panders to a specific crowd.

In our book “American Jesus” by Stephen Prothero, the chairman of the religious department at Boston University, has published an engaging book that explains how the Son of God “Jesus Christ” became the nation’s most known and forming celebrity figure. While the United States of America was founded on religious freedom, Prothero explains to us that America has more active Christians than any other nation in history. And while this nation has been somewhat of a hedonistic society, Americans are more interested in the figure of Jesus than their Puritan forefathers, who were, as Prothero writes, "a God-fearing rather than Jesus-loving people." But that’s no surprise; Prothero warns us that Jesus may rule the country, but the people in the country

• According to Dr. Earley, the United States has shifted from a Christian nation to a _________________________ nation. (Be able to fill in the blank.)

The myth of the United States of America, having been founded as a Christian nation has long been circulated throughout our country’s history. Christian historians were the first to put forth this narrative and in today’s world, website writers and editors have taken up the cause. On the website, WhatChristiansWanttoKnow.com, Robert Driskell peddles the myth in an article entitled, “Was the United States of America Founded As A Christian Nation? A Look at the Facts.” Driskell quotes a number of Founding Fathers out of context and uses them as evidence for a Christian nation as well as uses the first amendment to claim that the Constitution did not intend for a strict separation between Church and State.

Steven Green argues that the origin myth of a Christian founding did not begin with the founding generation, but decades later and that today's Christian nationalists promote an erroneous reading of our past that distorts even that 19th century version of our beginnings. The fathers

Many people believe that that the motivation of the Christian church is to radically “change the world”. However, through his book To Change The World, James Davison Hunter explains how this common believe is a misconception. Rather, he shows readers that, from a sociological perspective, while Christians thrive in many areas of life by reaching others individually, they fundamentally components of creating cultural change.

One influential cult was based upon a mystical interpretation of Plato. Neo-Platonism was like a rational science that attempted to break down and describe every aspect of the divine essence and its relationship with the human soul. An Alexandrian Jew named Philo tried using Greek philosophy to interpret the Jewish scriptures. He wanted to unite the two traditions by suggesting that the Greek philosophers had been inspired by the same God who had revealed himself to the Jews.

Lohfink, Gerhard. Jesus and Community: The Social Dimension of Christian Faith. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984. Kindle.

The Explicit Gospel is a true eye opener with life changing implications, a modern day constitution of the Christian faith. This piece of literature adds a valuable Christian perspective with convicting truths that have been overlooked by Christians and many Christian institutions throughout our nation. The principles in this book will compel any American citizen to reevaluate their Christocentric worldview.

Christianity is a vast umbrella; a faith that shelters many souls. Believers of the Christian faith, if adhering to the scripture of the bible are governed to practice acts of empathy, compassion, kindness, selflessness, etc..Christians are supposed to reject judgment on one another, even though that is a trying task because mankind does it without effort. However, Christians believe that God created all in his image and we are all children of him. With that premise, it would be blasphemous to use such a faith to ones advantage. Political leaders tend to play on peoples emotions by using the power that Christianity holds against them by strong arming them to believe that if they do not follow them they are bad and in a sense rebelling against

Initially, America did not have a Christian foundation in the sense of creating a theocracy. However, it was shaped by Christian moral truths, and the forefathers created a hospitable environment that supported this religion. The relationship linking the state and religion grew strong as most of the people in the nation became Christians. This research paper outlines how Christianity came to be one of the major religions in the United States of America.

This passage made me think about what humans strive for, to be love. Love will be in politics and religion. I do not find that love connects to hostility due to fact that hostility is not a direct threat to a certain person/belief. I do no believe it places value on the enemies. If someone has an enemy, one usually ignore them/do something about the situation. The church does not want destruction. They only

Someone said once, “Jesus healed two blind men. With one He used mud, and with the other He didn’t use mud. Thank God it didn’t happen in our day because we’d have two denominations, the muddites and the anti-muddites.” The good news is that unity does not have to mean uni-formity, especially when uniformity is forced for the sake of unity. What ultimately defines a Christian is not what denomination one belongs to, but rather if they have a relationship with Jesus Christ. We can find unity in this. If we bicker over our doctrinal pet peeves, we most cer-tainly will be fragmented.

When reading these chapters I agreed with what Gailey and Culbertson had to say, they made very valid points throughout the chapters. After reading these chapters, it changed my mind about a couple of things that I had heard before. This paper met all expectations that I had before reading it, I expected it to be very knowledgeable and that was what I got from the chapters. Throughout this paper I learned the story of God transcends all cultural barriers, non-western Christians account for as much as 80%, missionaries don’t’ destroy culture, and language is beyond powerful. Years of Christianity has proved to have a positive effect on individuals and cultures.

The enduring problem is introduced as the relationship between “Christianity and civilization”. Neibuhr describes this as a problem because we know that our Almighty is all knowing and doesn’t commit sins. He is perfect in every way. Whereas as humans, we fall short and do commit sin and are not perfect by all means. It is argued that there are verses in the Bible that suggest we should be out of the ‘world’, and verses that say we should be in the world. It becomes hard to depict what is right and wrong, and what we should really go by when there are different biblical literatures available that does not represent a single example of a belief. Niebuhr gives examples of how Christians have attempted to deal with this “problem”