A Person 's Environment Is The Same Opportunity At The End Of The Day

Children who come from a lower social economic background are more likely to be in poverty themselves. This can lead to lower expectations of the child from both parents and also the education system, leaving them little or no hope of getting out of poverty even though they may have the ability to do so.

As specific contexts, currently, some people are having abundant wealth and social capital, whereas the rest lack of social and financial resources they need. There are various ways to success and obtain psychological well-being, but growing up with more financial sources and living with parents who are highly educated always makes individual to become successful and easier to promote social and emotional competence when compared to individuals from

This is because their families don’t have the time or money to buy things for them or to take them to places to work on the tasks they need to work on. This ties into the book Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell. In this book, Gladwell looks at success in a very different way, including “the ten thousand hour rule.” He explains that the rule says you need ten thousand hours of practice at something to be an expert at that specific task, and that when you become and expert you’re more likely to be successful. This relates back to children in poverty because these children don’t get their ten thousand hours of practice at a certain task. They don’t get the ten thousand hours in because their families do not provide them the opportunity to get the ten thousand hours in. This also relates to Gladwell’s book Outliers because he talks about how people have to have opportunities to get in the practice you need to be successful. This can relate to Gladwell’s book in one more way: the structure of people’s families. He states that families in poverty are less likely to be involved with their child, in sports or in academics, because they do not get the chance to be. This is just one of the many ways 3poverty affects the success of

In the study Lareau conducted, it can be see that working class and poor families differ slightly in that being poor means less resources and a means of a greater struggle for the child. The similarities found explain why being lower class has it benefits in some areas then if you were middle or upper class. Now Lareau is not telling people to raise their children one way or that being rich is better because even the rich have many disadvantages their children encounter. Lareau emphasizes, “Overall, daily life for working-class and poor children is slower paced, less pressured, and less structured than for their middle- and

This article says, “Too many of America’s most disadvantaged children grow up without the skills needed to thrive in the twenty-first century. Whether in educational attainment between income groups or racial/ethnic groups or across geographic locations—inequality persists.” This creates long-term problems within that community. Meaning people who start out with disadvantages, usually don’t have the skills that the upper class more privileged kids do which help them eventually get jobs and maintain this middle to upper class community. The disadvantages people receive bad jobs and

The impact of poverty on families can affect a child's growth and development. “Poverty and the Effects on parents and Children,” Nagel states, “Families in poverty, when parents are working, are influenced by the kind of occupations in which the parents work. Kohn has found that lower-class parents look at their children's behavior with a focus on its immediate consequences and its external characteristics, whereas middle-class parents explore their children's motives and the attitudes expressed by their behavior.” Growing up with negative and disciplinary parents, it can impact a child's moral and emotional growth through life. Children grow up by the examples and actions of their progenitor, and if they have meager parents then they may grow up to be just like them. “Another study conducted by the U.S. Department of Education found that for every year a child spends in poverty, there is the chance that the child will fall behind grade level by age 18.” Pupils that live in poverty that don't get

Poverty leads to insufficient opportunities, especially in college education. For instance, according to U.S. Department of Education, students who do not enter college or drop out of their classes are “predominantly persons from low-income families.” In support of this argument, the article states that “only 21 percent of those with family income of less than $25,000 were highly qualified for admission at a four-year institution” compared to the 56 percent of students with family income above $75,000. Therefore, students with bad economic conditions struggle with attending university even after entering it. The problem is that the African Americans race gets the harshest disadvantage from their poor economic conditions. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services publishes that almost 40 percent of African Americans under 18 are below the national poverty line, which is three-times higher than their white counterparts. This explicitly proves that unequal economic conditions are the main reason for inequality in education; African Americans are the most disadvantaged. Furthermore, the correlation between poor economic conditions and a lack of education among African Americans creates a chain of inequality. The poor economic backgrounds of African Americans obstruct their children from attending colleges and subsequently, the lack of higher education makes

Since poverty can span multiple generations its important how socioeconomics keeps the disadvantaged from achieving success. Poverty and the distribution of wealth are class issues, admittedly complicated by race and gender, we are born into a particular social class, and most of us will die in the same one into which we are born. While some will rise above our class origins, many more equally conscientious willing and able will remain in poverty. Although there are some cases that maybe used to counter the effects of socioeconomics on success, overachieving through hard work may still be halted and misunderstood. When people ask me how I managed to move out of poverty, I always get a lump in my throat. It is not because I am embarrassed to tell of my journey or because I want to forget that part of my past. Instead, I fear that people will think that I just decide to pull myself up by my boat

Some people are born into stable families, so they have m ore opportunities than those that are born into poverty. No matter how people feel toward the choices that the parents made, we can't hold this against the child.

People often have problems with being able to get out of poverty because they don’t know how to handle or control where their money goes. These problems root from the family; a person’s family is a big contributor to how a person decides to save money and whether or not they come from an impoverished environment. At a young age a person learns how to save money, be responsible, and spend just want is needed. Also, if a person is born into poverty that may dictate many things for the future because this way everything will be more difficult; this is more common in African American households all over the country. It could be very difficult to come out of poverty and become financially free, it's possible

I sense that the people with a good income have more time, are organized and have access to more resources and I assume the poor need to manage their time from helping parents in ways such as earning money, helping around the house and just cannot establish a set amount of time on working on school assignments. I strongly agree that habits is a large factor in achieving success. It is not all about how intelligent you are. Having good habits can help you be a lot more organized, you can create the right mindset, practicing makes perfect and if you can keep a good habit set in place, you can physically and even habits of good eating will help you mentally improve yourself into being a better person. Lastly, I like the four step method to success. Starting with do it for them, In the early ages, we are all so curious and learn a lot of things within 4 years of going to school that is a good time to teach little kids to grow into habits of waking up, going to the washroom our own, etc. Then we have with them where if we are stuck on a situation, we need our parents to

Alexis, I do agree with you that students in poverty are less likely to be successful then students in higher income. There is a chance for these students to succeed if they have the right teacher even if there parents are not involved in their children education. With the right help and guidance these students can have a chance to break the cycle but if they are put in the back and not getting the right help that they need they will continue following their parents foot

Society owes the children of the poor a fair start at life. "In the United States today, children under age 18 have the highest rate of poverty" (Kendall, 2015, p.243). These children start out behind. They may not have enough food to eat three meals a day, a bed to get a good night's sleep on, or the technology needed to do homework. If every child's basic needs are met, then that child can focus on school. There will still be kids who have more advantages because their family can afford more. That's not a problem. But it's unfair for a child to start out in a situation that sets them up to fail. Everyone should be given a chance to succeed and that means they need to start life with the basic necessities available to them. Their parent(s)

As mentioned earlier there are stereotypes that come with socioeconomic status, including that children from low socioeconomic status families tend to not perform as well in school as children from higher socioeconomic status families. This is not because the children from low socioeconomic status have a deficiency that causes them to underperform, but rather it is because there is an expectation that the children will not do as well and so the children walk into the classroom facing a losing battle (Schmitt-Wilson, 2013, p 228). The education that a child receives in the earliest years of their life sets up a framework for the education through the rest of their lifetime (Stull, 2013, p 54). That being said, if a child does not receive the best education in the earliest years of their schooling, it is not surprising when they do not do as well in school and do not seek higher education after high school. Another common stereotype is that children from low socioeconomic status will not go on to get high paying jobs, but even if this is true it is not

Furthermore, there is less opportunity to succeed and excel from one’s poor status in a poor country compared to living in a rich country. The “American Dream” is still a very sought after concept, in which a person from dissatisfactory situation travels to America in order to achieve a successful, fulfilling, and financially stable life. Shipler states, “Plenty of people have moved into jobs that put them above the threshold of poverty, only to discover that their student loans, their car payments, and the exorbitant interest charged on old credit card balances consume so much of their cash that they live better than before.”(Shipler 10) I disagree with this statement, because there are many convenient advantages that many poor people do not use, such as the great asset of networking. For example, many who are poor, there is a tendency to not be willing to put in the time and effort that would help one succeed. In addition, poor countries have perpetuating class social structures that make it difficult to excel